Cargando…
Pan-Driver-Negatives versus Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutants for C-Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma with Ground-Glass Opacity
Purpose: We aimed to verify the prognosis of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation of clinical (c)-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with the ground-glass opacity (GGO) component. Methods: We evaluated 226 cases of surgically resected c-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with GGO component. Endpoint...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35644565 http://dx.doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.22-00058 |
_version_ | 1784813470949048320 |
---|---|
author | Li, Ming Xi, Junjie Zhang, Huan Jin, Xing Zhang, Jianrong Feng, Mingxiang Zhan, Cheng Wang, Qun |
author_facet | Li, Ming Xi, Junjie Zhang, Huan Jin, Xing Zhang, Jianrong Feng, Mingxiang Zhan, Cheng Wang, Qun |
author_sort | Li, Ming |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: We aimed to verify the prognosis of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation of clinical (c)-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with the ground-glass opacity (GGO) component. Methods: We evaluated 226 cases of surgically resected c-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with GGO component. Endpoints were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to estimate the survival differences. Prognostic factors were assessed using the univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Among the 226 cases, 177 cases harbored the EGFR-mutant adenocarcinoma with the GGO component. The mean duration of follow-up time was 54.4 ± 1.2 months. The 5-year OS and RFS did not differ significantly between the EGFR-mutant and wild-type groups (5-year OS 100% vs. 94.3%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.276, P = 0.168; 5-year RFS 94.7% vs. 95.7%, HR 0.873, P = 0.864). Multivariable Cox hazard model revealed that radiologically solid component size (P = 0.010) and pathological node-positive (P = 0.036) were significant predictors of an inferior RFS. Conclusion: EGFR-mutant was not a prognostic factor of OS and RFS for c-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with the GGO component. Radiologically solid component size and pathological lymph node status were independent prognostic factors of worse RFS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9585333 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95853332022-11-03 Pan-Driver-Negatives versus Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutants for C-Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma with Ground-Glass Opacity Li, Ming Xi, Junjie Zhang, Huan Jin, Xing Zhang, Jianrong Feng, Mingxiang Zhan, Cheng Wang, Qun Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Original Article Purpose: We aimed to verify the prognosis of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation of clinical (c)-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with the ground-glass opacity (GGO) component. Methods: We evaluated 226 cases of surgically resected c-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with GGO component. Endpoints were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to estimate the survival differences. Prognostic factors were assessed using the univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Among the 226 cases, 177 cases harbored the EGFR-mutant adenocarcinoma with the GGO component. The mean duration of follow-up time was 54.4 ± 1.2 months. The 5-year OS and RFS did not differ significantly between the EGFR-mutant and wild-type groups (5-year OS 100% vs. 94.3%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.276, P = 0.168; 5-year RFS 94.7% vs. 95.7%, HR 0.873, P = 0.864). Multivariable Cox hazard model revealed that radiologically solid component size (P = 0.010) and pathological node-positive (P = 0.036) were significant predictors of an inferior RFS. Conclusion: EGFR-mutant was not a prognostic factor of OS and RFS for c-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with the GGO component. Radiologically solid component size and pathological lymph node status were independent prognostic factors of worse RFS. The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2022-05-28 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9585333/ /pubmed/35644565 http://dx.doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.22-00058 Text en ©2022 Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Li, Ming Xi, Junjie Zhang, Huan Jin, Xing Zhang, Jianrong Feng, Mingxiang Zhan, Cheng Wang, Qun Pan-Driver-Negatives versus Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutants for C-Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma with Ground-Glass Opacity |
title | Pan-Driver-Negatives versus Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutants for C-Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma with Ground-Glass Opacity |
title_full | Pan-Driver-Negatives versus Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutants for C-Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma with Ground-Glass Opacity |
title_fullStr | Pan-Driver-Negatives versus Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutants for C-Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma with Ground-Glass Opacity |
title_full_unstemmed | Pan-Driver-Negatives versus Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutants for C-Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma with Ground-Glass Opacity |
title_short | Pan-Driver-Negatives versus Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutants for C-Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma with Ground-Glass Opacity |
title_sort | pan-driver-negatives versus epidermal growth factor receptor mutants for c-stage ia lung adenocarcinoma with ground-glass opacity |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35644565 http://dx.doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.22-00058 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liming pandrivernegativesversusepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantsforcstageialungadenocarcinomawithgroundglassopacity AT xijunjie pandrivernegativesversusepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantsforcstageialungadenocarcinomawithgroundglassopacity AT zhanghuan pandrivernegativesversusepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantsforcstageialungadenocarcinomawithgroundglassopacity AT jinxing pandrivernegativesversusepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantsforcstageialungadenocarcinomawithgroundglassopacity AT zhangjianrong pandrivernegativesversusepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantsforcstageialungadenocarcinomawithgroundglassopacity AT fengmingxiang pandrivernegativesversusepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantsforcstageialungadenocarcinomawithgroundglassopacity AT zhancheng pandrivernegativesversusepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantsforcstageialungadenocarcinomawithgroundglassopacity AT wangqun pandrivernegativesversusepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantsforcstageialungadenocarcinomawithgroundglassopacity |