Cargando…

Risk factors for peripheral venous catheter failure: A prospective cohort study of 5345 patients

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the independent risk factors associated with peripheral venous catheter (PVC) failure and develop a model that can predict PVC failure. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter cohort study was carried out in nine tertiary hospitals in Suzhou, Chin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Ya-mei, Fan, Xiao-wen, Liu, Ming-hong, Wang, Jie, Yang, Yi-qun, Su, Yu-fang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33985394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11297298211015035
_version_ 1784813514859216896
author Chen, Ya-mei
Fan, Xiao-wen
Liu, Ming-hong
Wang, Jie
Yang, Yi-qun
Su, Yu-fang
author_facet Chen, Ya-mei
Fan, Xiao-wen
Liu, Ming-hong
Wang, Jie
Yang, Yi-qun
Su, Yu-fang
author_sort Chen, Ya-mei
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the independent risk factors associated with peripheral venous catheter (PVC) failure and develop a model that can predict PVC failure. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter cohort study was carried out in nine tertiary hospitals in Suzhou, China between December 2017 and February 2018. Adult patients undergoing first-time insertion of a PVC were observed from catheter insertion to removal. Logistic regression was used to identify the independent risk factors predicting PVC failure. RESULTS: This study included 5345 patients. The PVC failure rate was 54.05% (n = 2889/5345), and the most common causes of PVC failure were phlebitis (16.3%) and infiltration/extravasation (13.8%). On multivariate analysis, age (45–59 years: OR, 1.295; 95% CI, 1.074–1.561; 60–74 years: OR, 1.375; 95% CI, 1.143–1.654; ⩾75 years: OR, 1.676; 95% CI, 1.355–2.073); department (surgery OR, 1.229; 95% CI, 1.062–1.423; emergency internal/surgical ward OR, 1.451; 95% CI, 1.082–1.945); history of venous puncture in the last week (OR, 1.298, 95% CI 1.130–1.491); insertion site, number of puncture attempts, irritant fluid infusion, daily infusion time, daily infusion volume, and type of sealing liquid were independent predictors of PVC failure. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that a logistic regression model constructed using these variables had moderate accuracy for the prediction of PVC failure (area under the curve, 0.781). The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test demonstrated that the model was correctly specified (χ(2) = 2.514, p = 0.961). CONCLUSION: This study should raise awareness among healthcare providers of the risk factors for PVC failure. We recommend that healthcare providers use vascular access device selection tools to select a clinically appropriate device and for the timely detection of complications, and have a list of drugs classified as irritants or vesicants so they can monitor patients receiving fluid infusions containing these drugs more frequently.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9585540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95855402022-10-22 Risk factors for peripheral venous catheter failure: A prospective cohort study of 5345 patients Chen, Ya-mei Fan, Xiao-wen Liu, Ming-hong Wang, Jie Yang, Yi-qun Su, Yu-fang J Vasc Access Original Research Articles PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the independent risk factors associated with peripheral venous catheter (PVC) failure and develop a model that can predict PVC failure. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter cohort study was carried out in nine tertiary hospitals in Suzhou, China between December 2017 and February 2018. Adult patients undergoing first-time insertion of a PVC were observed from catheter insertion to removal. Logistic regression was used to identify the independent risk factors predicting PVC failure. RESULTS: This study included 5345 patients. The PVC failure rate was 54.05% (n = 2889/5345), and the most common causes of PVC failure were phlebitis (16.3%) and infiltration/extravasation (13.8%). On multivariate analysis, age (45–59 years: OR, 1.295; 95% CI, 1.074–1.561; 60–74 years: OR, 1.375; 95% CI, 1.143–1.654; ⩾75 years: OR, 1.676; 95% CI, 1.355–2.073); department (surgery OR, 1.229; 95% CI, 1.062–1.423; emergency internal/surgical ward OR, 1.451; 95% CI, 1.082–1.945); history of venous puncture in the last week (OR, 1.298, 95% CI 1.130–1.491); insertion site, number of puncture attempts, irritant fluid infusion, daily infusion time, daily infusion volume, and type of sealing liquid were independent predictors of PVC failure. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that a logistic regression model constructed using these variables had moderate accuracy for the prediction of PVC failure (area under the curve, 0.781). The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test demonstrated that the model was correctly specified (χ(2) = 2.514, p = 0.961). CONCLUSION: This study should raise awareness among healthcare providers of the risk factors for PVC failure. We recommend that healthcare providers use vascular access device selection tools to select a clinically appropriate device and for the timely detection of complications, and have a list of drugs classified as irritants or vesicants so they can monitor patients receiving fluid infusions containing these drugs more frequently. SAGE Publications 2021-05-13 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9585540/ /pubmed/33985394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11297298211015035 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Chen, Ya-mei
Fan, Xiao-wen
Liu, Ming-hong
Wang, Jie
Yang, Yi-qun
Su, Yu-fang
Risk factors for peripheral venous catheter failure: A prospective cohort study of 5345 patients
title Risk factors for peripheral venous catheter failure: A prospective cohort study of 5345 patients
title_full Risk factors for peripheral venous catheter failure: A prospective cohort study of 5345 patients
title_fullStr Risk factors for peripheral venous catheter failure: A prospective cohort study of 5345 patients
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for peripheral venous catheter failure: A prospective cohort study of 5345 patients
title_short Risk factors for peripheral venous catheter failure: A prospective cohort study of 5345 patients
title_sort risk factors for peripheral venous catheter failure: a prospective cohort study of 5345 patients
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33985394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11297298211015035
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyamei riskfactorsforperipheralvenouscatheterfailureaprospectivecohortstudyof5345patients
AT fanxiaowen riskfactorsforperipheralvenouscatheterfailureaprospectivecohortstudyof5345patients
AT liuminghong riskfactorsforperipheralvenouscatheterfailureaprospectivecohortstudyof5345patients
AT wangjie riskfactorsforperipheralvenouscatheterfailureaprospectivecohortstudyof5345patients
AT yangyiqun riskfactorsforperipheralvenouscatheterfailureaprospectivecohortstudyof5345patients
AT suyufang riskfactorsforperipheralvenouscatheterfailureaprospectivecohortstudyof5345patients