Cargando…

UK Expert Consensus Statement for the Optimal Use and Clinical Utility of Leadless Pacing Systems on Behalf of the British Heart Rhythm Society

Pacemakers are a key technology in the treatment of bradyarrhythmias. Leadless pacemakers (LP) were introduced to address limitations of transvenous devices. However, guidelines and other restrictions have led to LPs becoming niche products. The aim of this consensus statement was to determine the s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberts, Paul R, ElRefai, Mohamed, Foley, Paul, Rao, Archana, Sharman, David, Somani, Riyaz, Sporton, Simon, Wright, Gary, Zaidi, Amir, Pepper, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Radcliffe Cardiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36304202
http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/aer.2022.17
_version_ 1784813538682863616
author Roberts, Paul R
ElRefai, Mohamed
Foley, Paul
Rao, Archana
Sharman, David
Somani, Riyaz
Sporton, Simon
Wright, Gary
Zaidi, Amir
Pepper, Chris
author_facet Roberts, Paul R
ElRefai, Mohamed
Foley, Paul
Rao, Archana
Sharman, David
Somani, Riyaz
Sporton, Simon
Wright, Gary
Zaidi, Amir
Pepper, Chris
author_sort Roberts, Paul R
collection PubMed
description Pacemakers are a key technology in the treatment of bradyarrhythmias. Leadless pacemakers (LP) were introduced to address limitations of transvenous devices. However, guidelines and other restrictions have led to LPs becoming niche products. The aim of this consensus statement was to determine the strength of opinion of UK implantation experts as to how LPs can be more optimally used. Using a modified Delphi approach, a panel of LP experts developed 36 statements that were used to form a survey that was distributed to LP implanters in the UK. Stopping criteria included a 3-month window for response, a minimum 25% response rate and at least 75% of statements achieving the threshold for consensus (agreed at 66%). In all, 31 of 36 statements reached consensus, and 23 of these achieved ≥90% agreement. Five statements did not achieve consensus. On the basis of these results, seven recommendations were proposed. The implementation of these recommendations may increase the use of LPs, with the aim of improving patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9585647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Radcliffe Cardiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95856472022-10-26 UK Expert Consensus Statement for the Optimal Use and Clinical Utility of Leadless Pacing Systems on Behalf of the British Heart Rhythm Society Roberts, Paul R ElRefai, Mohamed Foley, Paul Rao, Archana Sharman, David Somani, Riyaz Sporton, Simon Wright, Gary Zaidi, Amir Pepper, Chris Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev Implantable Devices Pacemakers are a key technology in the treatment of bradyarrhythmias. Leadless pacemakers (LP) were introduced to address limitations of transvenous devices. However, guidelines and other restrictions have led to LPs becoming niche products. The aim of this consensus statement was to determine the strength of opinion of UK implantation experts as to how LPs can be more optimally used. Using a modified Delphi approach, a panel of LP experts developed 36 statements that were used to form a survey that was distributed to LP implanters in the UK. Stopping criteria included a 3-month window for response, a minimum 25% response rate and at least 75% of statements achieving the threshold for consensus (agreed at 66%). In all, 31 of 36 statements reached consensus, and 23 of these achieved ≥90% agreement. Five statements did not achieve consensus. On the basis of these results, seven recommendations were proposed. The implementation of these recommendations may increase the use of LPs, with the aim of improving patient outcomes. Radcliffe Cardiology 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9585647/ /pubmed/36304202 http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/aer.2022.17 Text en Copyright © 2022, Radcliffe Cardiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is open access under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License which allows users to copy, redistribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work is cited correctly.
spellingShingle Implantable Devices
Roberts, Paul R
ElRefai, Mohamed
Foley, Paul
Rao, Archana
Sharman, David
Somani, Riyaz
Sporton, Simon
Wright, Gary
Zaidi, Amir
Pepper, Chris
UK Expert Consensus Statement for the Optimal Use and Clinical Utility of Leadless Pacing Systems on Behalf of the British Heart Rhythm Society
title UK Expert Consensus Statement for the Optimal Use and Clinical Utility of Leadless Pacing Systems on Behalf of the British Heart Rhythm Society
title_full UK Expert Consensus Statement for the Optimal Use and Clinical Utility of Leadless Pacing Systems on Behalf of the British Heart Rhythm Society
title_fullStr UK Expert Consensus Statement for the Optimal Use and Clinical Utility of Leadless Pacing Systems on Behalf of the British Heart Rhythm Society
title_full_unstemmed UK Expert Consensus Statement for the Optimal Use and Clinical Utility of Leadless Pacing Systems on Behalf of the British Heart Rhythm Society
title_short UK Expert Consensus Statement for the Optimal Use and Clinical Utility of Leadless Pacing Systems on Behalf of the British Heart Rhythm Society
title_sort uk expert consensus statement for the optimal use and clinical utility of leadless pacing systems on behalf of the british heart rhythm society
topic Implantable Devices
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36304202
http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/aer.2022.17
work_keys_str_mv AT robertspaulr ukexpertconsensusstatementfortheoptimaluseandclinicalutilityofleadlesspacingsystemsonbehalfofthebritishheartrhythmsociety
AT elrefaimohamed ukexpertconsensusstatementfortheoptimaluseandclinicalutilityofleadlesspacingsystemsonbehalfofthebritishheartrhythmsociety
AT foleypaul ukexpertconsensusstatementfortheoptimaluseandclinicalutilityofleadlesspacingsystemsonbehalfofthebritishheartrhythmsociety
AT raoarchana ukexpertconsensusstatementfortheoptimaluseandclinicalutilityofleadlesspacingsystemsonbehalfofthebritishheartrhythmsociety
AT sharmandavid ukexpertconsensusstatementfortheoptimaluseandclinicalutilityofleadlesspacingsystemsonbehalfofthebritishheartrhythmsociety
AT somaniriyaz ukexpertconsensusstatementfortheoptimaluseandclinicalutilityofleadlesspacingsystemsonbehalfofthebritishheartrhythmsociety
AT sportonsimon ukexpertconsensusstatementfortheoptimaluseandclinicalutilityofleadlesspacingsystemsonbehalfofthebritishheartrhythmsociety
AT wrightgary ukexpertconsensusstatementfortheoptimaluseandclinicalutilityofleadlesspacingsystemsonbehalfofthebritishheartrhythmsociety
AT zaidiamir ukexpertconsensusstatementfortheoptimaluseandclinicalutilityofleadlesspacingsystemsonbehalfofthebritishheartrhythmsociety
AT pepperchris ukexpertconsensusstatementfortheoptimaluseandclinicalutilityofleadlesspacingsystemsonbehalfofthebritishheartrhythmsociety