Cargando…
UK Expert Consensus Statement for the Optimal Use and Clinical Utility of Leadless Pacing Systems on Behalf of the British Heart Rhythm Society
Pacemakers are a key technology in the treatment of bradyarrhythmias. Leadless pacemakers (LP) were introduced to address limitations of transvenous devices. However, guidelines and other restrictions have led to LPs becoming niche products. The aim of this consensus statement was to determine the s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Radcliffe Cardiology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36304202 http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/aer.2022.17 |
_version_ | 1784813538682863616 |
---|---|
author | Roberts, Paul R ElRefai, Mohamed Foley, Paul Rao, Archana Sharman, David Somani, Riyaz Sporton, Simon Wright, Gary Zaidi, Amir Pepper, Chris |
author_facet | Roberts, Paul R ElRefai, Mohamed Foley, Paul Rao, Archana Sharman, David Somani, Riyaz Sporton, Simon Wright, Gary Zaidi, Amir Pepper, Chris |
author_sort | Roberts, Paul R |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pacemakers are a key technology in the treatment of bradyarrhythmias. Leadless pacemakers (LP) were introduced to address limitations of transvenous devices. However, guidelines and other restrictions have led to LPs becoming niche products. The aim of this consensus statement was to determine the strength of opinion of UK implantation experts as to how LPs can be more optimally used. Using a modified Delphi approach, a panel of LP experts developed 36 statements that were used to form a survey that was distributed to LP implanters in the UK. Stopping criteria included a 3-month window for response, a minimum 25% response rate and at least 75% of statements achieving the threshold for consensus (agreed at 66%). In all, 31 of 36 statements reached consensus, and 23 of these achieved ≥90% agreement. Five statements did not achieve consensus. On the basis of these results, seven recommendations were proposed. The implementation of these recommendations may increase the use of LPs, with the aim of improving patient outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9585647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Radcliffe Cardiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95856472022-10-26 UK Expert Consensus Statement for the Optimal Use and Clinical Utility of Leadless Pacing Systems on Behalf of the British Heart Rhythm Society Roberts, Paul R ElRefai, Mohamed Foley, Paul Rao, Archana Sharman, David Somani, Riyaz Sporton, Simon Wright, Gary Zaidi, Amir Pepper, Chris Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev Implantable Devices Pacemakers are a key technology in the treatment of bradyarrhythmias. Leadless pacemakers (LP) were introduced to address limitations of transvenous devices. However, guidelines and other restrictions have led to LPs becoming niche products. The aim of this consensus statement was to determine the strength of opinion of UK implantation experts as to how LPs can be more optimally used. Using a modified Delphi approach, a panel of LP experts developed 36 statements that were used to form a survey that was distributed to LP implanters in the UK. Stopping criteria included a 3-month window for response, a minimum 25% response rate and at least 75% of statements achieving the threshold for consensus (agreed at 66%). In all, 31 of 36 statements reached consensus, and 23 of these achieved ≥90% agreement. Five statements did not achieve consensus. On the basis of these results, seven recommendations were proposed. The implementation of these recommendations may increase the use of LPs, with the aim of improving patient outcomes. Radcliffe Cardiology 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9585647/ /pubmed/36304202 http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/aer.2022.17 Text en Copyright © 2022, Radcliffe Cardiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is open access under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License which allows users to copy, redistribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work is cited correctly. |
spellingShingle | Implantable Devices Roberts, Paul R ElRefai, Mohamed Foley, Paul Rao, Archana Sharman, David Somani, Riyaz Sporton, Simon Wright, Gary Zaidi, Amir Pepper, Chris UK Expert Consensus Statement for the Optimal Use and Clinical Utility of Leadless Pacing Systems on Behalf of the British Heart Rhythm Society |
title | UK Expert Consensus Statement for the Optimal Use and Clinical Utility of Leadless Pacing Systems on Behalf of the British Heart Rhythm Society |
title_full | UK Expert Consensus Statement for the Optimal Use and Clinical Utility of Leadless Pacing Systems on Behalf of the British Heart Rhythm Society |
title_fullStr | UK Expert Consensus Statement for the Optimal Use and Clinical Utility of Leadless Pacing Systems on Behalf of the British Heart Rhythm Society |
title_full_unstemmed | UK Expert Consensus Statement for the Optimal Use and Clinical Utility of Leadless Pacing Systems on Behalf of the British Heart Rhythm Society |
title_short | UK Expert Consensus Statement for the Optimal Use and Clinical Utility of Leadless Pacing Systems on Behalf of the British Heart Rhythm Society |
title_sort | uk expert consensus statement for the optimal use and clinical utility of leadless pacing systems on behalf of the british heart rhythm society |
topic | Implantable Devices |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36304202 http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/aer.2022.17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robertspaulr ukexpertconsensusstatementfortheoptimaluseandclinicalutilityofleadlesspacingsystemsonbehalfofthebritishheartrhythmsociety AT elrefaimohamed ukexpertconsensusstatementfortheoptimaluseandclinicalutilityofleadlesspacingsystemsonbehalfofthebritishheartrhythmsociety AT foleypaul ukexpertconsensusstatementfortheoptimaluseandclinicalutilityofleadlesspacingsystemsonbehalfofthebritishheartrhythmsociety AT raoarchana ukexpertconsensusstatementfortheoptimaluseandclinicalutilityofleadlesspacingsystemsonbehalfofthebritishheartrhythmsociety AT sharmandavid ukexpertconsensusstatementfortheoptimaluseandclinicalutilityofleadlesspacingsystemsonbehalfofthebritishheartrhythmsociety AT somaniriyaz ukexpertconsensusstatementfortheoptimaluseandclinicalutilityofleadlesspacingsystemsonbehalfofthebritishheartrhythmsociety AT sportonsimon ukexpertconsensusstatementfortheoptimaluseandclinicalutilityofleadlesspacingsystemsonbehalfofthebritishheartrhythmsociety AT wrightgary ukexpertconsensusstatementfortheoptimaluseandclinicalutilityofleadlesspacingsystemsonbehalfofthebritishheartrhythmsociety AT zaidiamir ukexpertconsensusstatementfortheoptimaluseandclinicalutilityofleadlesspacingsystemsonbehalfofthebritishheartrhythmsociety AT pepperchris ukexpertconsensusstatementfortheoptimaluseandclinicalutilityofleadlesspacingsystemsonbehalfofthebritishheartrhythmsociety |