Cargando…

Efficacy of CAR-T immunotherapy in MET overexpressing tumors not eligible for anti-MET targeted therapy

BACKGROUND: Aberrant activation of the MET receptor in cancer is sustained by genetic alterations or, more frequently, by transcriptional upregulations. A fraction of MET-amplified or mutated tumors are sensible to MET targeting agents, but their responsiveness is typically short-lasting, as seconda...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiriaco, Cristina, Donini, Chiara, Cortese, Marco, Ughetto, Stefano, Modica, Chiara, Martinelli, Ilaria, Proment, Alessia, Vitali, Letizia, Fontani, Lara, Casucci, Monica, Comoglio, Paolo Maria, Giordano, Silvia, Sangiolo, Dario, Leuci, Valeria, Vigna, Elisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36271379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13046-022-02479-y
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Aberrant activation of the MET receptor in cancer is sustained by genetic alterations or, more frequently, by transcriptional upregulations. A fraction of MET-amplified or mutated tumors are sensible to MET targeting agents, but their responsiveness is typically short-lasting, as secondary resistance eventually occurs. Since in the absence of genetic alterations MET is usually not a tumor driver, MET overexpressing tumors are not/poorly responsive to MET targeted therapies. Consequently, the vast majority of tumors exhibiting MET activation still represent an unmet medical need. METHODS: Here we propose an immunotherapy strategy based on T lymphocytes expressing a Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) targeting MET overexpressing tumors of different histotypes. We engineered two different MET-CAR constructs and tested MET-CAR-T cell cytotoxic activity against different MET overexpressing models, including tumor cell lines, primary cancer cells, organoids, and xenografts in immune-deficient mice. RESULTS: We proved that MET-CAR-T exerted a specific cytotoxic activity against MET expressing cells. Cell killing was proportional to the level of MET expressed on the cell surface. While CAR-T cytotoxicity was minimal versus cells carrying MET at physiological levels, essentially sparing normal cells, the activity versus MET overexpressing tumors was robust, significantly controlling tumor cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Notably, MET-CAR-T cells were also able to brake acquired resistance to MET targeting agents in MET amplified cancer cells carrying secondary mutations in downstream signal transducers. CONCLUSIONS: We set and validated at the pre-clinical level a MET-CAR immunotherapy strategy potentially beneficial for cancers not eligible for MET targeted therapy with inhibitory molecules, including those exhibiting primary or secondary resistance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13046-022-02479-y.