Cargando…

On the nature of the plant ER exit sites

In plants, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi bodies are not only in close proximity, but are also physically linked. This unique organization raises questions about the nature of the transport vectors carrying cargo between the two organelles. Same as in metazoan and yeast cells, it was sugge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGinness, Alastair J., Schoberer, Jennifer, Pain, Charlotte, Brandizzi, Federica, Kriechbaumer, Verena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36275575
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1010569
_version_ 1784813553259118592
author McGinness, Alastair J.
Schoberer, Jennifer
Pain, Charlotte
Brandizzi, Federica
Kriechbaumer, Verena
author_facet McGinness, Alastair J.
Schoberer, Jennifer
Pain, Charlotte
Brandizzi, Federica
Kriechbaumer, Verena
author_sort McGinness, Alastair J.
collection PubMed
description In plants, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi bodies are not only in close proximity, but are also physically linked. This unique organization raises questions about the nature of the transport vectors carrying cargo between the two organelles. Same as in metazoan and yeast cells, it was suggested that cargo is transported from the ER to Golgi cisternae via COPII-coated vesicles produced at ribosome-free ER exit sites (ERES). Recent developments in mammalian cell research suggest, though, that COPII helps to select secretory cargo, but does not coat the carriers leaving the ER. Furthermore, it was shown that mammalian ERES expand into a tubular network containing secretory cargo, but no COPII components. Because of the close association of the ER and Golgi bodies in plant cells, it was previously proposed that ERES and the Golgi comprise a secretory unit that travels over or with a motile ER membrane. In this study, we aimed to explore the nature of ERES in plant cells and took advantage of high-resolution confocal microscopy and imaged ERES labelled with canonical markers (Sar1a, Sec16, Sec24). We found that ERES are dynamically connected to Golgi bodies and most likely represent pre-cis-Golgi cisternae. Furthermore, we showed fine tubular connections from the ER to Golgi compartments (ERGo tubules) as well as fine protrusions from ERES/Golgi cisternae connecting with the ER. We suggest that these tubules observed between the ER and Golgi as well as between the ER and ERES are involved in stabilizing the physical connection between ER and ERES/Golgi cisternae, but may also be involved in cargo transport from the ER to Golgi bodies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9585722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95857222022-10-22 On the nature of the plant ER exit sites McGinness, Alastair J. Schoberer, Jennifer Pain, Charlotte Brandizzi, Federica Kriechbaumer, Verena Front Plant Sci Plant Science In plants, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi bodies are not only in close proximity, but are also physically linked. This unique organization raises questions about the nature of the transport vectors carrying cargo between the two organelles. Same as in metazoan and yeast cells, it was suggested that cargo is transported from the ER to Golgi cisternae via COPII-coated vesicles produced at ribosome-free ER exit sites (ERES). Recent developments in mammalian cell research suggest, though, that COPII helps to select secretory cargo, but does not coat the carriers leaving the ER. Furthermore, it was shown that mammalian ERES expand into a tubular network containing secretory cargo, but no COPII components. Because of the close association of the ER and Golgi bodies in plant cells, it was previously proposed that ERES and the Golgi comprise a secretory unit that travels over or with a motile ER membrane. In this study, we aimed to explore the nature of ERES in plant cells and took advantage of high-resolution confocal microscopy and imaged ERES labelled with canonical markers (Sar1a, Sec16, Sec24). We found that ERES are dynamically connected to Golgi bodies and most likely represent pre-cis-Golgi cisternae. Furthermore, we showed fine tubular connections from the ER to Golgi compartments (ERGo tubules) as well as fine protrusions from ERES/Golgi cisternae connecting with the ER. We suggest that these tubules observed between the ER and Golgi as well as between the ER and ERES are involved in stabilizing the physical connection between ER and ERES/Golgi cisternae, but may also be involved in cargo transport from the ER to Golgi bodies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9585722/ /pubmed/36275575 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1010569 Text en Copyright © 2022 McGinness, Schoberer, Pain, Brandizzi and Kriechbaumer https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
McGinness, Alastair J.
Schoberer, Jennifer
Pain, Charlotte
Brandizzi, Federica
Kriechbaumer, Verena
On the nature of the plant ER exit sites
title On the nature of the plant ER exit sites
title_full On the nature of the plant ER exit sites
title_fullStr On the nature of the plant ER exit sites
title_full_unstemmed On the nature of the plant ER exit sites
title_short On the nature of the plant ER exit sites
title_sort on the nature of the plant er exit sites
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36275575
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1010569
work_keys_str_mv AT mcginnessalastairj onthenatureoftheplanterexitsites
AT schobererjennifer onthenatureoftheplanterexitsites
AT paincharlotte onthenatureoftheplanterexitsites
AT brandizzifederica onthenatureoftheplanterexitsites
AT kriechbaumerverena onthenatureoftheplanterexitsites