Cargando…

One year of digital teaching in psychiatry as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Knowledge gain and content evaluation of medical students for two summer semesters in 2020 and 2021

After the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, digital teaching had to be implemented by most universities at short notice and widely replaced classroom teaching. As a consequence, digital teaching further reduced direct social interaction for students. One year after the introduction of digi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Besse, Matthias, Signerski-Krieger, Jörg, Wiltfang, Jens, Bartels, Claudia, Belz, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9586409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36269719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276660
_version_ 1784813688705777664
author Besse, Matthias
Signerski-Krieger, Jörg
Wiltfang, Jens
Bartels, Claudia
Belz, Michael
author_facet Besse, Matthias
Signerski-Krieger, Jörg
Wiltfang, Jens
Bartels, Claudia
Belz, Michael
author_sort Besse, Matthias
collection PubMed
description After the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, digital teaching had to be implemented by most universities at short notice and widely replaced classroom teaching. As a consequence, digital teaching further reduced direct social interaction for students. One year after the introduction of digital teaching formats at our university medical center (department of psychiatry and psychotherapy), teaching evaluation of students from summer semesters 2020 and 2021 (SS20, SS21) were compared. The main objective of this study was to objectify whether students evaluate digital teaching less favorably after one year of its implementation. Ratings of 311 medical students on (1) knowledge gain, (2) teaching contents and (3) subjective advantages of digital teaching were analyzed for the two separate cohorts SS20 (n = 175) and SS21 (n = 136). Students also rated their pandemic-related stress level, and if learning progress had been reduced by the pandemic in general. Significant knowledge gain was achieved for all included domains in psychiatry (all p < .001), and did not differ between SS20/SS21. Teaching contents in SS21 were rated worse in six out of eight domains compared to SS20 (p < .001 to .05). Also, subjective advantages of digital teaching vanished in most domains comparing the cohorts of SS21 and SS20 (p < .001 to .05). No differences were found for pandemic-related stress level and subjective learning progress. Limitations include the post-hoc design, possible bias from individual exam grades, and sampling bias. The present study showed that knowledge gain can be considered to be stable one year after the pandemic-related implementation of digital teaching. However, sustainability of this teaching format should be monitored critically: The subject of psychiatry and psychotherapy thrives on direct communication, which can be compromised when using digital formats only. In this light, implementation of more interactive formats in digital teaching is discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9586409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95864092022-10-22 One year of digital teaching in psychiatry as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Knowledge gain and content evaluation of medical students for two summer semesters in 2020 and 2021 Besse, Matthias Signerski-Krieger, Jörg Wiltfang, Jens Bartels, Claudia Belz, Michael PLoS One Research Article After the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, digital teaching had to be implemented by most universities at short notice and widely replaced classroom teaching. As a consequence, digital teaching further reduced direct social interaction for students. One year after the introduction of digital teaching formats at our university medical center (department of psychiatry and psychotherapy), teaching evaluation of students from summer semesters 2020 and 2021 (SS20, SS21) were compared. The main objective of this study was to objectify whether students evaluate digital teaching less favorably after one year of its implementation. Ratings of 311 medical students on (1) knowledge gain, (2) teaching contents and (3) subjective advantages of digital teaching were analyzed for the two separate cohorts SS20 (n = 175) and SS21 (n = 136). Students also rated their pandemic-related stress level, and if learning progress had been reduced by the pandemic in general. Significant knowledge gain was achieved for all included domains in psychiatry (all p < .001), and did not differ between SS20/SS21. Teaching contents in SS21 were rated worse in six out of eight domains compared to SS20 (p < .001 to .05). Also, subjective advantages of digital teaching vanished in most domains comparing the cohorts of SS21 and SS20 (p < .001 to .05). No differences were found for pandemic-related stress level and subjective learning progress. Limitations include the post-hoc design, possible bias from individual exam grades, and sampling bias. The present study showed that knowledge gain can be considered to be stable one year after the pandemic-related implementation of digital teaching. However, sustainability of this teaching format should be monitored critically: The subject of psychiatry and psychotherapy thrives on direct communication, which can be compromised when using digital formats only. In this light, implementation of more interactive formats in digital teaching is discussed. Public Library of Science 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9586409/ /pubmed/36269719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276660 Text en © 2022 Besse et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Besse, Matthias
Signerski-Krieger, Jörg
Wiltfang, Jens
Bartels, Claudia
Belz, Michael
One year of digital teaching in psychiatry as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Knowledge gain and content evaluation of medical students for two summer semesters in 2020 and 2021
title One year of digital teaching in psychiatry as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Knowledge gain and content evaluation of medical students for two summer semesters in 2020 and 2021
title_full One year of digital teaching in psychiatry as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Knowledge gain and content evaluation of medical students for two summer semesters in 2020 and 2021
title_fullStr One year of digital teaching in psychiatry as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Knowledge gain and content evaluation of medical students for two summer semesters in 2020 and 2021
title_full_unstemmed One year of digital teaching in psychiatry as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Knowledge gain and content evaluation of medical students for two summer semesters in 2020 and 2021
title_short One year of digital teaching in psychiatry as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Knowledge gain and content evaluation of medical students for two summer semesters in 2020 and 2021
title_sort one year of digital teaching in psychiatry as a response to the covid-19 pandemic: knowledge gain and content evaluation of medical students for two summer semesters in 2020 and 2021
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9586409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36269719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276660
work_keys_str_mv AT bessematthias oneyearofdigitalteachinginpsychiatryasaresponsetothecovid19pandemicknowledgegainandcontentevaluationofmedicalstudentsfortwosummersemestersin2020and2021
AT signerskikriegerjorg oneyearofdigitalteachinginpsychiatryasaresponsetothecovid19pandemicknowledgegainandcontentevaluationofmedicalstudentsfortwosummersemestersin2020and2021
AT wiltfangjens oneyearofdigitalteachinginpsychiatryasaresponsetothecovid19pandemicknowledgegainandcontentevaluationofmedicalstudentsfortwosummersemestersin2020and2021
AT bartelsclaudia oneyearofdigitalteachinginpsychiatryasaresponsetothecovid19pandemicknowledgegainandcontentevaluationofmedicalstudentsfortwosummersemestersin2020and2021
AT belzmichael oneyearofdigitalteachinginpsychiatryasaresponsetothecovid19pandemicknowledgegainandcontentevaluationofmedicalstudentsfortwosummersemestersin2020and2021