Clinical Efficacy of Antianlotinib Combined with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Its Effect on Serum VEGF, CEA, and SCC-Ag

PURPOSE: This study is aimed at investigating the clinical safety and effectiveness of anlotinib combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: We selected 68 NSCLC patients treated at the Tumor Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University from October 2019 to January 2022. Patients receiving ICI monotherapy were included in the control group (n = 36), whereas patients receiving anlotinib combined with ICIs were enrolled in the study group (n = 32). The survival, adverse reactions (AEs), and short-term clinical effectiveness of the two groups were observed. The tumor markers (vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-AG)) and T lymphocyte subsets (CD3(+), CD4(+), CD8(+), and CD4(+)/CD8(+)) were determined before and after treatment. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the disease-control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR) in the study group were substantially higher than that of the control group (62.50 vs. 36.11, 81.25 vs. 55.56; P < 0.05). The serum levels of VEGF, CEA, and SCC-AG in the two groups were considerably lower after two cycles of treatment (P < 0.05), and the serum levels of VEGF, CEA, and SCC-AG in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Following therapy, CD8(+) in both groups decreased dramatically (P < 0.05), whereas CD3(+), CD4(+), and CD4(+)/CD8(+) were significantly increased, but there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of gastrointestinal, respiratory, cardiovascular, and immune-related adverse events did not significantly differ between the two groups (P > 0.05). The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the control and study groups for the first-line treatment patients was 7.2 and 9.8 months, respectively, whereas for the second-line treatment patients, it was 4.2 and 6.4 months, respectively. The mean PFS of study group was substantially longer than that of the control group regardless of the first- or second-line treatment. According to Cox analysis, the number of drug lines and TNM stage was independent risk variables impacting the prognosis of patients in this study. CONCLUSION: The combination of anlotinib with ICIs was more effective than either agent alone in the first- and second-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. This treatment regimen did not interfere with immunological recovery or increase side effects.