Cargando…

Distinguish the Value of the Benign Nevus and Melanomas Using Machine Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Melanomas, the most common human malignancy, are primarily diagnosed visually, beginning with an initial clinical screening and followed potentially by dermoscopic analysis, a biopsy, and histopathological examination. We aimed to systematically review the performance and quality of mach...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Suli, Chu, Yihang, Wang, Ying, Wang, Yantong, Hu, Shipeng, Wu, Xiangye, Qi, Xinwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9586788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36274972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1734327
_version_ 1784813759391334400
author Li, Suli
Chu, Yihang
Wang, Ying
Wang, Yantong
Hu, Shipeng
Wu, Xiangye
Qi, Xinwei
author_facet Li, Suli
Chu, Yihang
Wang, Ying
Wang, Yantong
Hu, Shipeng
Wu, Xiangye
Qi, Xinwei
author_sort Li, Suli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Melanomas, the most common human malignancy, are primarily diagnosed visually, beginning with an initial clinical screening and followed potentially by dermoscopic analysis, a biopsy, and histopathological examination. We aimed to systematically review the performance and quality of machine learning-based methods in distinguishing melanoma and benign nevus in the relevant literature. METHOD: Four databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library) were searched to retrieve the relevant studies published until March 26, 2022. The Predictive model Deviation Risk Assessment tool (PROBAST) was used to assess the deviation risk of opposing law. RESULT: This systematic review included thirty researches with 114007 subjects and 71 machine learning models. The convolutional neural network was the main machine learning method. The pooled sensitivity was 85% (95% CI 82–87%), the specificity was 86% (82–88%), and the C-index was 0.87 (0.84–0.90). CONCLUSION: The findings of our study showed that ML algorithms had high sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing between melanoma and benign nevi. This suggests that state-of-the-art ML-based algorithms for distinguishing melanoma from benign nevi may be ready for clinical use. However, a large proportion of the earlier published studies had methodological flaws, such as lack of external validation and lack of clinician comparisons. The results of these studies should be interpreted with caution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9586788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95867882022-10-22 Distinguish the Value of the Benign Nevus and Melanomas Using Machine Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review Li, Suli Chu, Yihang Wang, Ying Wang, Yantong Hu, Shipeng Wu, Xiangye Qi, Xinwei Mediators Inflamm Review Article BACKGROUND: Melanomas, the most common human malignancy, are primarily diagnosed visually, beginning with an initial clinical screening and followed potentially by dermoscopic analysis, a biopsy, and histopathological examination. We aimed to systematically review the performance and quality of machine learning-based methods in distinguishing melanoma and benign nevus in the relevant literature. METHOD: Four databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library) were searched to retrieve the relevant studies published until March 26, 2022. The Predictive model Deviation Risk Assessment tool (PROBAST) was used to assess the deviation risk of opposing law. RESULT: This systematic review included thirty researches with 114007 subjects and 71 machine learning models. The convolutional neural network was the main machine learning method. The pooled sensitivity was 85% (95% CI 82–87%), the specificity was 86% (82–88%), and the C-index was 0.87 (0.84–0.90). CONCLUSION: The findings of our study showed that ML algorithms had high sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing between melanoma and benign nevi. This suggests that state-of-the-art ML-based algorithms for distinguishing melanoma from benign nevi may be ready for clinical use. However, a large proportion of the earlier published studies had methodological flaws, such as lack of external validation and lack of clinician comparisons. The results of these studies should be interpreted with caution. Hindawi 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9586788/ /pubmed/36274972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1734327 Text en Copyright © 2022 Suli Li et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Li, Suli
Chu, Yihang
Wang, Ying
Wang, Yantong
Hu, Shipeng
Wu, Xiangye
Qi, Xinwei
Distinguish the Value of the Benign Nevus and Melanomas Using Machine Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
title Distinguish the Value of the Benign Nevus and Melanomas Using Machine Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
title_full Distinguish the Value of the Benign Nevus and Melanomas Using Machine Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
title_fullStr Distinguish the Value of the Benign Nevus and Melanomas Using Machine Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Distinguish the Value of the Benign Nevus and Melanomas Using Machine Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
title_short Distinguish the Value of the Benign Nevus and Melanomas Using Machine Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
title_sort distinguish the value of the benign nevus and melanomas using machine learning: a meta-analysis and systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9586788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36274972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1734327
work_keys_str_mv AT lisuli distinguishthevalueofthebenignnevusandmelanomasusingmachinelearningametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT chuyihang distinguishthevalueofthebenignnevusandmelanomasusingmachinelearningametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT wangying distinguishthevalueofthebenignnevusandmelanomasusingmachinelearningametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT wangyantong distinguishthevalueofthebenignnevusandmelanomasusingmachinelearningametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT hushipeng distinguishthevalueofthebenignnevusandmelanomasusingmachinelearningametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT wuxiangye distinguishthevalueofthebenignnevusandmelanomasusingmachinelearningametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT qixinwei distinguishthevalueofthebenignnevusandmelanomasusingmachinelearningametaanalysisandsystematicreview