Cargando…
Distinguish the Value of the Benign Nevus and Melanomas Using Machine Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Melanomas, the most common human malignancy, are primarily diagnosed visually, beginning with an initial clinical screening and followed potentially by dermoscopic analysis, a biopsy, and histopathological examination. We aimed to systematically review the performance and quality of mach...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9586788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36274972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1734327 |
_version_ | 1784813759391334400 |
---|---|
author | Li, Suli Chu, Yihang Wang, Ying Wang, Yantong Hu, Shipeng Wu, Xiangye Qi, Xinwei |
author_facet | Li, Suli Chu, Yihang Wang, Ying Wang, Yantong Hu, Shipeng Wu, Xiangye Qi, Xinwei |
author_sort | Li, Suli |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Melanomas, the most common human malignancy, are primarily diagnosed visually, beginning with an initial clinical screening and followed potentially by dermoscopic analysis, a biopsy, and histopathological examination. We aimed to systematically review the performance and quality of machine learning-based methods in distinguishing melanoma and benign nevus in the relevant literature. METHOD: Four databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library) were searched to retrieve the relevant studies published until March 26, 2022. The Predictive model Deviation Risk Assessment tool (PROBAST) was used to assess the deviation risk of opposing law. RESULT: This systematic review included thirty researches with 114007 subjects and 71 machine learning models. The convolutional neural network was the main machine learning method. The pooled sensitivity was 85% (95% CI 82–87%), the specificity was 86% (82–88%), and the C-index was 0.87 (0.84–0.90). CONCLUSION: The findings of our study showed that ML algorithms had high sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing between melanoma and benign nevi. This suggests that state-of-the-art ML-based algorithms for distinguishing melanoma from benign nevi may be ready for clinical use. However, a large proportion of the earlier published studies had methodological flaws, such as lack of external validation and lack of clinician comparisons. The results of these studies should be interpreted with caution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9586788 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95867882022-10-22 Distinguish the Value of the Benign Nevus and Melanomas Using Machine Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review Li, Suli Chu, Yihang Wang, Ying Wang, Yantong Hu, Shipeng Wu, Xiangye Qi, Xinwei Mediators Inflamm Review Article BACKGROUND: Melanomas, the most common human malignancy, are primarily diagnosed visually, beginning with an initial clinical screening and followed potentially by dermoscopic analysis, a biopsy, and histopathological examination. We aimed to systematically review the performance and quality of machine learning-based methods in distinguishing melanoma and benign nevus in the relevant literature. METHOD: Four databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library) were searched to retrieve the relevant studies published until March 26, 2022. The Predictive model Deviation Risk Assessment tool (PROBAST) was used to assess the deviation risk of opposing law. RESULT: This systematic review included thirty researches with 114007 subjects and 71 machine learning models. The convolutional neural network was the main machine learning method. The pooled sensitivity was 85% (95% CI 82–87%), the specificity was 86% (82–88%), and the C-index was 0.87 (0.84–0.90). CONCLUSION: The findings of our study showed that ML algorithms had high sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing between melanoma and benign nevi. This suggests that state-of-the-art ML-based algorithms for distinguishing melanoma from benign nevi may be ready for clinical use. However, a large proportion of the earlier published studies had methodological flaws, such as lack of external validation and lack of clinician comparisons. The results of these studies should be interpreted with caution. Hindawi 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9586788/ /pubmed/36274972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1734327 Text en Copyright © 2022 Suli Li et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Li, Suli Chu, Yihang Wang, Ying Wang, Yantong Hu, Shipeng Wu, Xiangye Qi, Xinwei Distinguish the Value of the Benign Nevus and Melanomas Using Machine Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title | Distinguish the Value of the Benign Nevus and Melanomas Using Machine Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title_full | Distinguish the Value of the Benign Nevus and Melanomas Using Machine Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Distinguish the Value of the Benign Nevus and Melanomas Using Machine Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Distinguish the Value of the Benign Nevus and Melanomas Using Machine Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title_short | Distinguish the Value of the Benign Nevus and Melanomas Using Machine Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title_sort | distinguish the value of the benign nevus and melanomas using machine learning: a meta-analysis and systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9586788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36274972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1734327 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lisuli distinguishthevalueofthebenignnevusandmelanomasusingmachinelearningametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT chuyihang distinguishthevalueofthebenignnevusandmelanomasusingmachinelearningametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT wangying distinguishthevalueofthebenignnevusandmelanomasusingmachinelearningametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT wangyantong distinguishthevalueofthebenignnevusandmelanomasusingmachinelearningametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT hushipeng distinguishthevalueofthebenignnevusandmelanomasusingmachinelearningametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT wuxiangye distinguishthevalueofthebenignnevusandmelanomasusingmachinelearningametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT qixinwei distinguishthevalueofthebenignnevusandmelanomasusingmachinelearningametaanalysisandsystematicreview |