Cargando…
A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial Evaluating Dehydrated Human Amniotic Membrane in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers
This randomized controlled trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of weekly and biweekly applications of dehydrated human amnion and chorion allograft (dHACA) plus standard of care compared to standard of care alone on chronic venous leg ulcers. METHODS: This open-label randomized controlled t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9586828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36067479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000009650 |
_version_ | 1784813769398943744 |
---|---|
author | Serena, Thomas E. Orgill, Dennis P. Armstrong, David G. Galiano, Robert D. Glat, Paul M. Carter, Marissa J. Kaufman, Jarrod P. Li, William W. Zelen, Charles M. |
author_facet | Serena, Thomas E. Orgill, Dennis P. Armstrong, David G. Galiano, Robert D. Glat, Paul M. Carter, Marissa J. Kaufman, Jarrod P. Li, William W. Zelen, Charles M. |
author_sort | Serena, Thomas E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This randomized controlled trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of weekly and biweekly applications of dehydrated human amnion and chorion allograft (dHACA) plus standard of care compared to standard of care alone on chronic venous leg ulcers. METHODS: This open-label randomized controlled trial included patients with chronic venous leg ulcers at eight wound care centers across the United States. The primary endpoint was the proportion of healed ulcers at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of ulcers achieving 40 percent closure at 4 weeks and the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Among 101 patients screened for eligibility, 60 were eligible and enrolled. At 12 weeks, significantly more venous leg ulcers healed in the two dHACA-treated groups (75 percent) than in the standard-of-care group (30 percent) (p = 0.001) even after adjustment for wound area (p = 0.002), with an odds ratio of 8.7 (95 percent CI, 2.2 to 33.6). There were no significant differences in the proportion of wounds with percentage area reduction greater than or equal to 40 percent at 4 weeks among all groups. The adverse event rate was 63.5 percent. Among the 38 adverse events, none were graft or procedure related, and all were resolved with appropriate treatment. CONCLUSIONS: dHACA and standard of care, either applied weekly or biweekly, significantly healed more venous leg ulcers than standard of care alone, suggesting that the use of aseptically processed dHACA is advantageous and a safe and effective treatment option in the healing of chronic venous leg ulcers. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, I. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9586828 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95868282022-10-27 A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial Evaluating Dehydrated Human Amniotic Membrane in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers Serena, Thomas E. Orgill, Dennis P. Armstrong, David G. Galiano, Robert D. Glat, Paul M. Carter, Marissa J. Kaufman, Jarrod P. Li, William W. Zelen, Charles M. Plast Reconstr Surg Reconstructive: Lower Extremity: Original Articles This randomized controlled trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of weekly and biweekly applications of dehydrated human amnion and chorion allograft (dHACA) plus standard of care compared to standard of care alone on chronic venous leg ulcers. METHODS: This open-label randomized controlled trial included patients with chronic venous leg ulcers at eight wound care centers across the United States. The primary endpoint was the proportion of healed ulcers at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of ulcers achieving 40 percent closure at 4 weeks and the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Among 101 patients screened for eligibility, 60 were eligible and enrolled. At 12 weeks, significantly more venous leg ulcers healed in the two dHACA-treated groups (75 percent) than in the standard-of-care group (30 percent) (p = 0.001) even after adjustment for wound area (p = 0.002), with an odds ratio of 8.7 (95 percent CI, 2.2 to 33.6). There were no significant differences in the proportion of wounds with percentage area reduction greater than or equal to 40 percent at 4 weeks among all groups. The adverse event rate was 63.5 percent. Among the 38 adverse events, none were graft or procedure related, and all were resolved with appropriate treatment. CONCLUSIONS: dHACA and standard of care, either applied weekly or biweekly, significantly healed more venous leg ulcers than standard of care alone, suggesting that the use of aseptically processed dHACA is advantageous and a safe and effective treatment option in the healing of chronic venous leg ulcers. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, I. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-09-02 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9586828/ /pubmed/36067479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000009650 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Reconstructive: Lower Extremity: Original Articles Serena, Thomas E. Orgill, Dennis P. Armstrong, David G. Galiano, Robert D. Glat, Paul M. Carter, Marissa J. Kaufman, Jarrod P. Li, William W. Zelen, Charles M. A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial Evaluating Dehydrated Human Amniotic Membrane in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers |
title | A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial Evaluating Dehydrated Human Amniotic Membrane in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers |
title_full | A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial Evaluating Dehydrated Human Amniotic Membrane in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers |
title_fullStr | A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial Evaluating Dehydrated Human Amniotic Membrane in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers |
title_full_unstemmed | A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial Evaluating Dehydrated Human Amniotic Membrane in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers |
title_short | A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial Evaluating Dehydrated Human Amniotic Membrane in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers |
title_sort | multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical trial evaluating dehydrated human amniotic membrane in the treatment of venous leg ulcers |
topic | Reconstructive: Lower Extremity: Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9586828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36067479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000009650 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT serenathomase amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingdehydratedhumanamnioticmembraneinthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers AT orgilldennisp amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingdehydratedhumanamnioticmembraneinthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers AT armstrongdavidg amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingdehydratedhumanamnioticmembraneinthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers AT galianorobertd amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingdehydratedhumanamnioticmembraneinthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers AT glatpaulm amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingdehydratedhumanamnioticmembraneinthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers AT cartermarissaj amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingdehydratedhumanamnioticmembraneinthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers AT kaufmanjarrodp amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingdehydratedhumanamnioticmembraneinthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers AT liwilliamw amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingdehydratedhumanamnioticmembraneinthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers AT zelencharlesm amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingdehydratedhumanamnioticmembraneinthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers AT serenathomase multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingdehydratedhumanamnioticmembraneinthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers AT orgilldennisp multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingdehydratedhumanamnioticmembraneinthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers AT armstrongdavidg multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingdehydratedhumanamnioticmembraneinthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers AT galianorobertd multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingdehydratedhumanamnioticmembraneinthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers AT glatpaulm multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingdehydratedhumanamnioticmembraneinthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers AT cartermarissaj multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingdehydratedhumanamnioticmembraneinthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers AT kaufmanjarrodp multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingdehydratedhumanamnioticmembraneinthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers AT liwilliamw multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingdehydratedhumanamnioticmembraneinthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers AT zelencharlesm multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingdehydratedhumanamnioticmembraneinthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers |