Cargando…
Within-participant statistics for cognitive science
Experimental studies in cognitive science typically focus on the population average effect. An alternative is to test each individual participant and then quantify the proportion of the population that would show the effect: the prevalence, or participant replication probability. We argue that this...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9586881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35710894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.05.008 |
_version_ | 1784813781842395136 |
---|---|
author | Ince, Robin A.A. Kay, Jim W. Schyns, Philippe G. |
author_facet | Ince, Robin A.A. Kay, Jim W. Schyns, Philippe G. |
author_sort | Ince, Robin A.A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Experimental studies in cognitive science typically focus on the population average effect. An alternative is to test each individual participant and then quantify the proportion of the population that would show the effect: the prevalence, or participant replication probability. We argue that this approach has conceptual and practical advantages. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9586881 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95868812022-10-24 Within-participant statistics for cognitive science Ince, Robin A.A. Kay, Jim W. Schyns, Philippe G. Trends Cogn Sci Forum Experimental studies in cognitive science typically focus on the population average effect. An alternative is to test each individual participant and then quantify the proportion of the population that would show the effect: the prevalence, or participant replication probability. We argue that this approach has conceptual and practical advantages. Elsevier Science 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9586881/ /pubmed/35710894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.05.008 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Forum Ince, Robin A.A. Kay, Jim W. Schyns, Philippe G. Within-participant statistics for cognitive science |
title | Within-participant statistics for cognitive science |
title_full | Within-participant statistics for cognitive science |
title_fullStr | Within-participant statistics for cognitive science |
title_full_unstemmed | Within-participant statistics for cognitive science |
title_short | Within-participant statistics for cognitive science |
title_sort | within-participant statistics for cognitive science |
topic | Forum |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9586881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35710894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.05.008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT incerobinaa withinparticipantstatisticsforcognitivescience AT kayjimw withinparticipantstatisticsforcognitivescience AT schynsphilippeg withinparticipantstatisticsforcognitivescience |