Cargando…

Three Monthly Injections Versus One Initial Injection of Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: 12-Month Results of a Prospective Randomized Study

INTRODUCTION: To compare three monthly injections versus one initial injection of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) followed by pro re nata (PRN) dosing to treat macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: Seventy-four patients were randomized (1:1) to the 3 + PRN or 1 + P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Wenyi, Guo, Jingli, Xu, Gezhi, Liu, Wei, Chang, Qing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36223056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00588-7
_version_ 1784813844858667008
author Tang, Wenyi
Guo, Jingli
Xu, Gezhi
Liu, Wei
Chang, Qing
author_facet Tang, Wenyi
Guo, Jingli
Xu, Gezhi
Liu, Wei
Chang, Qing
author_sort Tang, Wenyi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To compare three monthly injections versus one initial injection of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) followed by pro re nata (PRN) dosing to treat macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: Seventy-four patients were randomized (1:1) to the 3 + PRN or 1 + PRN groups. Patients underwent monthly evaluations and additional IVR injections were administered if the retreatment criteria were met. The functional and anatomical outcomes were recorded. The factors associated with the improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (93.2%) completed the study. At 12 months, the mean gain in BCVA was 12.9 letters in the 3 + PRN group and 14.3 letters in the 1 + PRN group, which was not significant (P = 0.59). The mean reduction in central macular thickness was 297.8 μm in the 3 + PRN group and 300.2 μm in the 1 + PRN group (P = 0.96). The macular vascular density changes of the superficial and deep capillary plexuses were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.99 and 0.70, respectively). The mean number of IVR injections was 5.0 in the 3 + PRN group and 4.2 in the 1 + PRN group (P = 0.17). The incidence of retinal neovascularization was similar in both groups (P = 0.67). The baseline BCVA, but not the treatment regimen, was significantly associated with the change in BCVA (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Significant gains in BCVA and maintenance of macular perfusion were achieved in BRVO eyes treated with the 3 + PRN or 1 + PRN regimens. Baseline BCVA was a prognostic factor for the visual improvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: A prospective randomized controlled trial to compare the 1 + PRN and 3 + PRN regimen in the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (ChiCTR2000038086). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-022-00588-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9587151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95871512022-11-29 Three Monthly Injections Versus One Initial Injection of Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: 12-Month Results of a Prospective Randomized Study Tang, Wenyi Guo, Jingli Xu, Gezhi Liu, Wei Chang, Qing Ophthalmol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: To compare three monthly injections versus one initial injection of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) followed by pro re nata (PRN) dosing to treat macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: Seventy-four patients were randomized (1:1) to the 3 + PRN or 1 + PRN groups. Patients underwent monthly evaluations and additional IVR injections were administered if the retreatment criteria were met. The functional and anatomical outcomes were recorded. The factors associated with the improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (93.2%) completed the study. At 12 months, the mean gain in BCVA was 12.9 letters in the 3 + PRN group and 14.3 letters in the 1 + PRN group, which was not significant (P = 0.59). The mean reduction in central macular thickness was 297.8 μm in the 3 + PRN group and 300.2 μm in the 1 + PRN group (P = 0.96). The macular vascular density changes of the superficial and deep capillary plexuses were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.99 and 0.70, respectively). The mean number of IVR injections was 5.0 in the 3 + PRN group and 4.2 in the 1 + PRN group (P = 0.17). The incidence of retinal neovascularization was similar in both groups (P = 0.67). The baseline BCVA, but not the treatment regimen, was significantly associated with the change in BCVA (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Significant gains in BCVA and maintenance of macular perfusion were achieved in BRVO eyes treated with the 3 + PRN or 1 + PRN regimens. Baseline BCVA was a prognostic factor for the visual improvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: A prospective randomized controlled trial to compare the 1 + PRN and 3 + PRN regimen in the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (ChiCTR2000038086). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-022-00588-7. Springer Healthcare 2022-10-12 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9587151/ /pubmed/36223056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00588-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Tang, Wenyi
Guo, Jingli
Xu, Gezhi
Liu, Wei
Chang, Qing
Three Monthly Injections Versus One Initial Injection of Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: 12-Month Results of a Prospective Randomized Study
title Three Monthly Injections Versus One Initial Injection of Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: 12-Month Results of a Prospective Randomized Study
title_full Three Monthly Injections Versus One Initial Injection of Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: 12-Month Results of a Prospective Randomized Study
title_fullStr Three Monthly Injections Versus One Initial Injection of Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: 12-Month Results of a Prospective Randomized Study
title_full_unstemmed Three Monthly Injections Versus One Initial Injection of Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: 12-Month Results of a Prospective Randomized Study
title_short Three Monthly Injections Versus One Initial Injection of Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: 12-Month Results of a Prospective Randomized Study
title_sort three monthly injections versus one initial injection of ranibizumab for the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: 12-month results of a prospective randomized study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36223056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00588-7
work_keys_str_mv AT tangwenyi threemonthlyinjectionsversusoneinitialinjectionofranibizumabforthetreatmentofmacularedemasecondarytobranchretinalveinocclusion12monthresultsofaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT guojingli threemonthlyinjectionsversusoneinitialinjectionofranibizumabforthetreatmentofmacularedemasecondarytobranchretinalveinocclusion12monthresultsofaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT xugezhi threemonthlyinjectionsversusoneinitialinjectionofranibizumabforthetreatmentofmacularedemasecondarytobranchretinalveinocclusion12monthresultsofaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT liuwei threemonthlyinjectionsversusoneinitialinjectionofranibizumabforthetreatmentofmacularedemasecondarytobranchretinalveinocclusion12monthresultsofaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT changqing threemonthlyinjectionsversusoneinitialinjectionofranibizumabforthetreatmentofmacularedemasecondarytobranchretinalveinocclusion12monthresultsofaprospectiverandomizedstudy