Cargando…
Fixed-loop vs. adjustable-loop cortical button devices for femoral fixation in ACL reconstruction – a systematic review and meta-analysis
PURPOSE: Button implants with either a fixed-loop device (FLD) or adjustable-loop device (ALD) are used frequently in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR). Since revision ACLR is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, it is important to investigate the difference in risk of revision b...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36269424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00544-1 |
_version_ | 1784813847853400064 |
---|---|
author | Elmholt, Simone Birkebæk Nielsen, Torsten Grønbech Lind, Martin |
author_facet | Elmholt, Simone Birkebæk Nielsen, Torsten Grønbech Lind, Martin |
author_sort | Elmholt, Simone Birkebæk |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Button implants with either a fixed-loop device (FLD) or adjustable-loop device (ALD) are used frequently in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR). Since revision ACLR is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, it is important to investigate the difference in risk of revision between FLDs and ALDs. Therefore, this paper aims to systematically assess the risk of revision ACLR between ALDs and FLDs as well as secondary outcomes such as knee stability and patient reported outcomes (PROMs). METHODS: The online databases Embase, Medline (PubMed), and SPORTDiscus were searched, comparing FLDs and ALDs for femoral fixation in patients undergoing primary ACLR with hamstring autografts. Risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomised studies. Due to heterogeneity a meta-analysis on revision rates were not possible. A random-effect meta-analysis was performed for the secondary outcomes and the quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Fifteen cohort studies with a total of 2686 patients were included. None of the studies found a clinical difference between ALDs and FLDs in either revision rates, knee stability or PROMS. However, the quality of evidence was graded “very low” due to study designs, risk of bias, and heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Studies of better quality are needed to investigate the risk of revision ACLR between ALDs and FLDs. There was no difference in knee stability and PROMs between the ALDs and FLDs; however, the interpretation of these results is challenging due to low quality of evidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9587170 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95871702022-10-23 Fixed-loop vs. adjustable-loop cortical button devices for femoral fixation in ACL reconstruction – a systematic review and meta-analysis Elmholt, Simone Birkebæk Nielsen, Torsten Grønbech Lind, Martin J Exp Orthop Review Paper PURPOSE: Button implants with either a fixed-loop device (FLD) or adjustable-loop device (ALD) are used frequently in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR). Since revision ACLR is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, it is important to investigate the difference in risk of revision between FLDs and ALDs. Therefore, this paper aims to systematically assess the risk of revision ACLR between ALDs and FLDs as well as secondary outcomes such as knee stability and patient reported outcomes (PROMs). METHODS: The online databases Embase, Medline (PubMed), and SPORTDiscus were searched, comparing FLDs and ALDs for femoral fixation in patients undergoing primary ACLR with hamstring autografts. Risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomised studies. Due to heterogeneity a meta-analysis on revision rates were not possible. A random-effect meta-analysis was performed for the secondary outcomes and the quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Fifteen cohort studies with a total of 2686 patients were included. None of the studies found a clinical difference between ALDs and FLDs in either revision rates, knee stability or PROMS. However, the quality of evidence was graded “very low” due to study designs, risk of bias, and heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Studies of better quality are needed to investigate the risk of revision ACLR between ALDs and FLDs. There was no difference in knee stability and PROMs between the ALDs and FLDs; however, the interpretation of these results is challenging due to low quality of evidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9587170/ /pubmed/36269424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00544-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Paper Elmholt, Simone Birkebæk Nielsen, Torsten Grønbech Lind, Martin Fixed-loop vs. adjustable-loop cortical button devices for femoral fixation in ACL reconstruction – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Fixed-loop vs. adjustable-loop cortical button devices for femoral fixation in ACL reconstruction – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Fixed-loop vs. adjustable-loop cortical button devices for femoral fixation in ACL reconstruction – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Fixed-loop vs. adjustable-loop cortical button devices for femoral fixation in ACL reconstruction – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Fixed-loop vs. adjustable-loop cortical button devices for femoral fixation in ACL reconstruction – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Fixed-loop vs. adjustable-loop cortical button devices for femoral fixation in ACL reconstruction – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | fixed-loop vs. adjustable-loop cortical button devices for femoral fixation in acl reconstruction – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36269424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00544-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elmholtsimonebirkebæk fixedloopvsadjustableloopcorticalbuttondevicesforfemoralfixationinaclreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT nielsentorstengrønbech fixedloopvsadjustableloopcorticalbuttondevicesforfemoralfixationinaclreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lindmartin fixedloopvsadjustableloopcorticalbuttondevicesforfemoralfixationinaclreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |