Cargando…
Comparisons of Using Cycloplegic Biometry Versus Non-cycloplegic Biometry in the Calculation of the Cycloplegic Refractive Lens Powers
INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the difference between the calculation of cycloplegic crystalline lens power (LP) using non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic biometry data in children, and associated factors were explored. METHODS: A total of 821 children were enrolled and only right eye was analyze...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36114405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00569-w |
_version_ | 1784813849298337792 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Zhirong Xie, Rui Luo, Ruiyu Yao, Jiaqian Jin, Ling Zhou, Zhuandi Chen, Kezhe Zhuo, Xiaohua Zhu, Yingting Zhuo, Yehong |
author_facet | Wang, Zhirong Xie, Rui Luo, Ruiyu Yao, Jiaqian Jin, Ling Zhou, Zhuandi Chen, Kezhe Zhuo, Xiaohua Zhu, Yingting Zhuo, Yehong |
author_sort | Wang, Zhirong |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the difference between the calculation of cycloplegic crystalline lens power (LP) using non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic biometry data in children, and associated factors were explored. METHODS: A total of 821 children were enrolled and only right eye was analyzed. The corneal radii (CR), corneal power (CP), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and axial length (AL) before and after cycloplegia were obtained using IOLMaster 700. Anterior segment length (ASL) was defined as ACD plus LT. The cycloplegic LP was calculated with Bennett’s formula. In addition, LP calculated with cycloplegic data was defined as cLP, otherwise it was defined as nLP. The ΔLP (defined as the value as cLP minus nLP) was compared among age, gender, and refractive states groups. Associated factors of ΔLP and |ΔLP| were explored by Pearson’s correlation and multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: The mean age of the 821 subjects was 9.83 ± 2.97 years with a mean spherical equivalent refraction (SER) of − 1.06 ± 2.12 D. Overall, the ACD, LT, and ASL were significantly affected by cycloplegia agent (all p < 0.001; paired t test). Conversely, no statistically significant differences were documented in AL, CP, or AL/CR ratio before and after inducing cycloplegia (p = 0.917, p = 0.515, and p = 0.549, respectively). Significant difference was found between nLP and cLP (21.24 ± 1.58 D vs 21.43 ± 1.92 D, p = 0.001). The mean ΔLP was 0.11 ± 0.87 D (range from − 7.01 D to 7.08 D). Significant change in LP was found in low and medium groups, respectively (0.13 ± 0.81 D, p = 0.001; 0.11 ± 0.48 D, p = 0.043). In the multiple regression analysis, |ΔLP| was exclusively associated with ΔASL (β = 0.172, [95% CI 0.112–0.300], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that using cycloplegic biometry could lead to an overestimation in LP for low and moderate myopia eyes. This finding is likely to facilitate the refractive development research in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05247099. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-022-00569-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9587181 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95871812022-11-29 Comparisons of Using Cycloplegic Biometry Versus Non-cycloplegic Biometry in the Calculation of the Cycloplegic Refractive Lens Powers Wang, Zhirong Xie, Rui Luo, Ruiyu Yao, Jiaqian Jin, Ling Zhou, Zhuandi Chen, Kezhe Zhuo, Xiaohua Zhu, Yingting Zhuo, Yehong Ophthalmol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the difference between the calculation of cycloplegic crystalline lens power (LP) using non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic biometry data in children, and associated factors were explored. METHODS: A total of 821 children were enrolled and only right eye was analyzed. The corneal radii (CR), corneal power (CP), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and axial length (AL) before and after cycloplegia were obtained using IOLMaster 700. Anterior segment length (ASL) was defined as ACD plus LT. The cycloplegic LP was calculated with Bennett’s formula. In addition, LP calculated with cycloplegic data was defined as cLP, otherwise it was defined as nLP. The ΔLP (defined as the value as cLP minus nLP) was compared among age, gender, and refractive states groups. Associated factors of ΔLP and |ΔLP| were explored by Pearson’s correlation and multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: The mean age of the 821 subjects was 9.83 ± 2.97 years with a mean spherical equivalent refraction (SER) of − 1.06 ± 2.12 D. Overall, the ACD, LT, and ASL were significantly affected by cycloplegia agent (all p < 0.001; paired t test). Conversely, no statistically significant differences were documented in AL, CP, or AL/CR ratio before and after inducing cycloplegia (p = 0.917, p = 0.515, and p = 0.549, respectively). Significant difference was found between nLP and cLP (21.24 ± 1.58 D vs 21.43 ± 1.92 D, p = 0.001). The mean ΔLP was 0.11 ± 0.87 D (range from − 7.01 D to 7.08 D). Significant change in LP was found in low and medium groups, respectively (0.13 ± 0.81 D, p = 0.001; 0.11 ± 0.48 D, p = 0.043). In the multiple regression analysis, |ΔLP| was exclusively associated with ΔASL (β = 0.172, [95% CI 0.112–0.300], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that using cycloplegic biometry could lead to an overestimation in LP for low and moderate myopia eyes. This finding is likely to facilitate the refractive development research in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05247099. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-022-00569-w. Springer Healthcare 2022-09-16 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9587181/ /pubmed/36114405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00569-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Wang, Zhirong Xie, Rui Luo, Ruiyu Yao, Jiaqian Jin, Ling Zhou, Zhuandi Chen, Kezhe Zhuo, Xiaohua Zhu, Yingting Zhuo, Yehong Comparisons of Using Cycloplegic Biometry Versus Non-cycloplegic Biometry in the Calculation of the Cycloplegic Refractive Lens Powers |
title | Comparisons of Using Cycloplegic Biometry Versus Non-cycloplegic Biometry in the Calculation of the Cycloplegic Refractive Lens Powers |
title_full | Comparisons of Using Cycloplegic Biometry Versus Non-cycloplegic Biometry in the Calculation of the Cycloplegic Refractive Lens Powers |
title_fullStr | Comparisons of Using Cycloplegic Biometry Versus Non-cycloplegic Biometry in the Calculation of the Cycloplegic Refractive Lens Powers |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparisons of Using Cycloplegic Biometry Versus Non-cycloplegic Biometry in the Calculation of the Cycloplegic Refractive Lens Powers |
title_short | Comparisons of Using Cycloplegic Biometry Versus Non-cycloplegic Biometry in the Calculation of the Cycloplegic Refractive Lens Powers |
title_sort | comparisons of using cycloplegic biometry versus non-cycloplegic biometry in the calculation of the cycloplegic refractive lens powers |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36114405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00569-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangzhirong comparisonsofusingcycloplegicbiometryversusnoncycloplegicbiometryinthecalculationofthecycloplegicrefractivelenspowers AT xierui comparisonsofusingcycloplegicbiometryversusnoncycloplegicbiometryinthecalculationofthecycloplegicrefractivelenspowers AT luoruiyu comparisonsofusingcycloplegicbiometryversusnoncycloplegicbiometryinthecalculationofthecycloplegicrefractivelenspowers AT yaojiaqian comparisonsofusingcycloplegicbiometryversusnoncycloplegicbiometryinthecalculationofthecycloplegicrefractivelenspowers AT jinling comparisonsofusingcycloplegicbiometryversusnoncycloplegicbiometryinthecalculationofthecycloplegicrefractivelenspowers AT zhouzhuandi comparisonsofusingcycloplegicbiometryversusnoncycloplegicbiometryinthecalculationofthecycloplegicrefractivelenspowers AT chenkezhe comparisonsofusingcycloplegicbiometryversusnoncycloplegicbiometryinthecalculationofthecycloplegicrefractivelenspowers AT zhuoxiaohua comparisonsofusingcycloplegicbiometryversusnoncycloplegicbiometryinthecalculationofthecycloplegicrefractivelenspowers AT zhuyingting comparisonsofusingcycloplegicbiometryversusnoncycloplegicbiometryinthecalculationofthecycloplegicrefractivelenspowers AT zhuoyehong comparisonsofusingcycloplegicbiometryversusnoncycloplegicbiometryinthecalculationofthecycloplegicrefractivelenspowers |