Cargando…

Comparisons of Using Cycloplegic Biometry Versus Non-cycloplegic Biometry in the Calculation of the Cycloplegic Refractive Lens Powers

INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the difference between the calculation of cycloplegic crystalline lens power (LP) using non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic biometry data in children, and associated factors were explored. METHODS: A total of 821 children were enrolled and only right eye was analyze...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zhirong, Xie, Rui, Luo, Ruiyu, Yao, Jiaqian, Jin, Ling, Zhou, Zhuandi, Chen, Kezhe, Zhuo, Xiaohua, Zhu, Yingting, Zhuo, Yehong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36114405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00569-w
_version_ 1784813849298337792
author Wang, Zhirong
Xie, Rui
Luo, Ruiyu
Yao, Jiaqian
Jin, Ling
Zhou, Zhuandi
Chen, Kezhe
Zhuo, Xiaohua
Zhu, Yingting
Zhuo, Yehong
author_facet Wang, Zhirong
Xie, Rui
Luo, Ruiyu
Yao, Jiaqian
Jin, Ling
Zhou, Zhuandi
Chen, Kezhe
Zhuo, Xiaohua
Zhu, Yingting
Zhuo, Yehong
author_sort Wang, Zhirong
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the difference between the calculation of cycloplegic crystalline lens power (LP) using non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic biometry data in children, and associated factors were explored. METHODS: A total of 821 children were enrolled and only right eye was analyzed. The corneal radii (CR), corneal power (CP), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and axial length (AL) before and after cycloplegia were obtained using IOLMaster 700. Anterior segment length (ASL) was defined as ACD plus LT. The cycloplegic LP was calculated with Bennett’s formula. In addition, LP calculated with cycloplegic data was defined as cLP, otherwise it was defined as nLP. The ΔLP (defined as the value as cLP minus nLP) was compared among age, gender, and refractive states groups. Associated factors of ΔLP and |ΔLP| were explored by Pearson’s correlation and multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: The mean age of the 821 subjects was 9.83 ± 2.97 years with a mean spherical equivalent refraction (SER) of − 1.06 ± 2.12 D. Overall, the ACD, LT, and ASL were significantly affected by cycloplegia agent (all p < 0.001; paired t test). Conversely, no statistically significant differences were documented in AL, CP, or AL/CR ratio before and after inducing cycloplegia (p = 0.917, p = 0.515, and p = 0.549, respectively). Significant difference was found between nLP and cLP (21.24 ± 1.58 D vs 21.43 ± 1.92 D, p = 0.001). The mean ΔLP was 0.11 ± 0.87 D (range from − 7.01 D to 7.08 D). Significant change in LP was found in low and medium groups, respectively (0.13 ± 0.81 D, p = 0.001; 0.11 ± 0.48 D, p = 0.043). In the multiple regression analysis, |ΔLP| was exclusively associated with ΔASL (β = 0.172, [95% CI 0.112–0.300], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that using cycloplegic biometry could lead to an overestimation in LP for low and moderate myopia eyes. This finding is likely to facilitate the refractive development research in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05247099. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-022-00569-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9587181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95871812022-11-29 Comparisons of Using Cycloplegic Biometry Versus Non-cycloplegic Biometry in the Calculation of the Cycloplegic Refractive Lens Powers Wang, Zhirong Xie, Rui Luo, Ruiyu Yao, Jiaqian Jin, Ling Zhou, Zhuandi Chen, Kezhe Zhuo, Xiaohua Zhu, Yingting Zhuo, Yehong Ophthalmol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the difference between the calculation of cycloplegic crystalline lens power (LP) using non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic biometry data in children, and associated factors were explored. METHODS: A total of 821 children were enrolled and only right eye was analyzed. The corneal radii (CR), corneal power (CP), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and axial length (AL) before and after cycloplegia were obtained using IOLMaster 700. Anterior segment length (ASL) was defined as ACD plus LT. The cycloplegic LP was calculated with Bennett’s formula. In addition, LP calculated with cycloplegic data was defined as cLP, otherwise it was defined as nLP. The ΔLP (defined as the value as cLP minus nLP) was compared among age, gender, and refractive states groups. Associated factors of ΔLP and |ΔLP| were explored by Pearson’s correlation and multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: The mean age of the 821 subjects was 9.83 ± 2.97 years with a mean spherical equivalent refraction (SER) of − 1.06 ± 2.12 D. Overall, the ACD, LT, and ASL were significantly affected by cycloplegia agent (all p < 0.001; paired t test). Conversely, no statistically significant differences were documented in AL, CP, or AL/CR ratio before and after inducing cycloplegia (p = 0.917, p = 0.515, and p = 0.549, respectively). Significant difference was found between nLP and cLP (21.24 ± 1.58 D vs 21.43 ± 1.92 D, p = 0.001). The mean ΔLP was 0.11 ± 0.87 D (range from − 7.01 D to 7.08 D). Significant change in LP was found in low and medium groups, respectively (0.13 ± 0.81 D, p = 0.001; 0.11 ± 0.48 D, p = 0.043). In the multiple regression analysis, |ΔLP| was exclusively associated with ΔASL (β = 0.172, [95% CI 0.112–0.300], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that using cycloplegic biometry could lead to an overestimation in LP for low and moderate myopia eyes. This finding is likely to facilitate the refractive development research in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05247099. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-022-00569-w. Springer Healthcare 2022-09-16 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9587181/ /pubmed/36114405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00569-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Wang, Zhirong
Xie, Rui
Luo, Ruiyu
Yao, Jiaqian
Jin, Ling
Zhou, Zhuandi
Chen, Kezhe
Zhuo, Xiaohua
Zhu, Yingting
Zhuo, Yehong
Comparisons of Using Cycloplegic Biometry Versus Non-cycloplegic Biometry in the Calculation of the Cycloplegic Refractive Lens Powers
title Comparisons of Using Cycloplegic Biometry Versus Non-cycloplegic Biometry in the Calculation of the Cycloplegic Refractive Lens Powers
title_full Comparisons of Using Cycloplegic Biometry Versus Non-cycloplegic Biometry in the Calculation of the Cycloplegic Refractive Lens Powers
title_fullStr Comparisons of Using Cycloplegic Biometry Versus Non-cycloplegic Biometry in the Calculation of the Cycloplegic Refractive Lens Powers
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons of Using Cycloplegic Biometry Versus Non-cycloplegic Biometry in the Calculation of the Cycloplegic Refractive Lens Powers
title_short Comparisons of Using Cycloplegic Biometry Versus Non-cycloplegic Biometry in the Calculation of the Cycloplegic Refractive Lens Powers
title_sort comparisons of using cycloplegic biometry versus non-cycloplegic biometry in the calculation of the cycloplegic refractive lens powers
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36114405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00569-w
work_keys_str_mv AT wangzhirong comparisonsofusingcycloplegicbiometryversusnoncycloplegicbiometryinthecalculationofthecycloplegicrefractivelenspowers
AT xierui comparisonsofusingcycloplegicbiometryversusnoncycloplegicbiometryinthecalculationofthecycloplegicrefractivelenspowers
AT luoruiyu comparisonsofusingcycloplegicbiometryversusnoncycloplegicbiometryinthecalculationofthecycloplegicrefractivelenspowers
AT yaojiaqian comparisonsofusingcycloplegicbiometryversusnoncycloplegicbiometryinthecalculationofthecycloplegicrefractivelenspowers
AT jinling comparisonsofusingcycloplegicbiometryversusnoncycloplegicbiometryinthecalculationofthecycloplegicrefractivelenspowers
AT zhouzhuandi comparisonsofusingcycloplegicbiometryversusnoncycloplegicbiometryinthecalculationofthecycloplegicrefractivelenspowers
AT chenkezhe comparisonsofusingcycloplegicbiometryversusnoncycloplegicbiometryinthecalculationofthecycloplegicrefractivelenspowers
AT zhuoxiaohua comparisonsofusingcycloplegicbiometryversusnoncycloplegicbiometryinthecalculationofthecycloplegicrefractivelenspowers
AT zhuyingting comparisonsofusingcycloplegicbiometryversusnoncycloplegicbiometryinthecalculationofthecycloplegicrefractivelenspowers
AT zhuoyehong comparisonsofusingcycloplegicbiometryversusnoncycloplegicbiometryinthecalculationofthecycloplegicrefractivelenspowers