Cargando…
Interim FDG-PET/CT for therapy monitoring and prognostication in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
The aim of the study was to assess the predictive value of interim FDG-PET/CT (iPET) in patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) treated with Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy. A total of 245 consecutive patients with de novo HL between 12/2013 and 12/2017 were eval...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36271128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22032-3 |
_version_ | 1784813856703381504 |
---|---|
author | Al-Ibraheem, Akram Anwer, Farah Juweid, Malik E. Shagera, Qaid Ahmed Khalaf, Aysar N. Obeidat, Shahed Mansour, Areen Ma’koseh, Mohammad Halahleh, Khalid Jaradat, Imad Almasri, Nidal Mansour, Asem |
author_facet | Al-Ibraheem, Akram Anwer, Farah Juweid, Malik E. Shagera, Qaid Ahmed Khalaf, Aysar N. Obeidat, Shahed Mansour, Areen Ma’koseh, Mohammad Halahleh, Khalid Jaradat, Imad Almasri, Nidal Mansour, Asem |
author_sort | Al-Ibraheem, Akram |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of the study was to assess the predictive value of interim FDG-PET/CT (iPET) in patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) treated with Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy. A total of 245 consecutive patients with de novo HL between 12/2013 and 12/2017 were evaluated retrospectively. All patients were treated with upfront ABVD, performed PET/CT scans at baseline, after 2 cycles (interim PET, iPET2) or 4 cycles (iPET4) and at the end of therapy, and followed up for at least 6 months after therapy. The response status on iPET was defined according to the standard five-point Deauville scores (DS) as follows: complete metabolic response (CMR, DS 1–3) and non-complete metabolic response (nCMR) (DS 4 and 5). End-of-treatment (EoT) response was assessed by FDG-PET/CT and if needed biopsy confirmation of PET-positive findings. The association between iPET and EoT response was investigated using logistic regression analysis. Survival analysis was performed using the Cox regression hazard model and Kaplan–Meier methods. Sixty-nine patients underwent iPET-2 and 176 iPET-4. No association was found between the timing of iPET and iPET response status (P-value = 0.71). Two hundred and one patients (82%) had iPET-CMR and 44 (18%) iPET -nCMR. iPET was strongly associated with EoT response status: 194/201 (96 .5%) of iPET-CMR had a complete response at the EoT while only 21/44 (47.7%) of patients with iPET-nCMR presented a complete response at EoT (P-value < 0.0001). The median follow-up was 32 months (range 6–81). Patients with iPET-CMR presented a better outcome with 91% 3 y event-free-survival (EFS) and 95% 3 y overall survival (OS) than those with iPET-nCMR (41 and 86%, respectively, P-value < 0.0001). In multivariable analyses, iPET retained an independent prognostic factor of EFS and OS (P-value < 0.0001 and P-value = 0.002, respectively). iPET is highly predictive of outcome of HL patients treated with ABVD and allows to tailor therapy to the individual patient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9587214 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95872142022-10-23 Interim FDG-PET/CT for therapy monitoring and prognostication in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Al-Ibraheem, Akram Anwer, Farah Juweid, Malik E. Shagera, Qaid Ahmed Khalaf, Aysar N. Obeidat, Shahed Mansour, Areen Ma’koseh, Mohammad Halahleh, Khalid Jaradat, Imad Almasri, Nidal Mansour, Asem Sci Rep Article The aim of the study was to assess the predictive value of interim FDG-PET/CT (iPET) in patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) treated with Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy. A total of 245 consecutive patients with de novo HL between 12/2013 and 12/2017 were evaluated retrospectively. All patients were treated with upfront ABVD, performed PET/CT scans at baseline, after 2 cycles (interim PET, iPET2) or 4 cycles (iPET4) and at the end of therapy, and followed up for at least 6 months after therapy. The response status on iPET was defined according to the standard five-point Deauville scores (DS) as follows: complete metabolic response (CMR, DS 1–3) and non-complete metabolic response (nCMR) (DS 4 and 5). End-of-treatment (EoT) response was assessed by FDG-PET/CT and if needed biopsy confirmation of PET-positive findings. The association between iPET and EoT response was investigated using logistic regression analysis. Survival analysis was performed using the Cox regression hazard model and Kaplan–Meier methods. Sixty-nine patients underwent iPET-2 and 176 iPET-4. No association was found between the timing of iPET and iPET response status (P-value = 0.71). Two hundred and one patients (82%) had iPET-CMR and 44 (18%) iPET -nCMR. iPET was strongly associated with EoT response status: 194/201 (96 .5%) of iPET-CMR had a complete response at the EoT while only 21/44 (47.7%) of patients with iPET-nCMR presented a complete response at EoT (P-value < 0.0001). The median follow-up was 32 months (range 6–81). Patients with iPET-CMR presented a better outcome with 91% 3 y event-free-survival (EFS) and 95% 3 y overall survival (OS) than those with iPET-nCMR (41 and 86%, respectively, P-value < 0.0001). In multivariable analyses, iPET retained an independent prognostic factor of EFS and OS (P-value < 0.0001 and P-value = 0.002, respectively). iPET is highly predictive of outcome of HL patients treated with ABVD and allows to tailor therapy to the individual patient. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9587214/ /pubmed/36271128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22032-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Al-Ibraheem, Akram Anwer, Farah Juweid, Malik E. Shagera, Qaid Ahmed Khalaf, Aysar N. Obeidat, Shahed Mansour, Areen Ma’koseh, Mohammad Halahleh, Khalid Jaradat, Imad Almasri, Nidal Mansour, Asem Interim FDG-PET/CT for therapy monitoring and prognostication in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma |
title | Interim FDG-PET/CT for therapy monitoring and prognostication in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma |
title_full | Interim FDG-PET/CT for therapy monitoring and prognostication in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma |
title_fullStr | Interim FDG-PET/CT for therapy monitoring and prognostication in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Interim FDG-PET/CT for therapy monitoring and prognostication in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma |
title_short | Interim FDG-PET/CT for therapy monitoring and prognostication in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma |
title_sort | interim fdg-pet/ct for therapy monitoring and prognostication in hodgkin’s lymphoma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36271128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22032-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alibraheemakram interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma AT anwerfarah interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma AT juweidmalike interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma AT shageraqaidahmed interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma AT khalafaysarn interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma AT obeidatshahed interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma AT mansourareen interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma AT makosehmohammad interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma AT halahlehkhalid interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma AT jaradatimad interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma AT almasrinidal interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma AT mansourasem interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma |