Cargando…

Interim FDG-PET/CT for therapy monitoring and prognostication in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

The aim of the study was to assess the predictive value of interim FDG-PET/CT (iPET) in patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) treated with Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy. A total of 245 consecutive patients with de novo HL between 12/2013 and 12/2017 were eval...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Ibraheem, Akram, Anwer, Farah, Juweid, Malik E., Shagera, Qaid Ahmed, Khalaf, Aysar N., Obeidat, Shahed, Mansour, Areen, Ma’koseh, Mohammad, Halahleh, Khalid, Jaradat, Imad, Almasri, Nidal, Mansour, Asem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36271128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22032-3
_version_ 1784813856703381504
author Al-Ibraheem, Akram
Anwer, Farah
Juweid, Malik E.
Shagera, Qaid Ahmed
Khalaf, Aysar N.
Obeidat, Shahed
Mansour, Areen
Ma’koseh, Mohammad
Halahleh, Khalid
Jaradat, Imad
Almasri, Nidal
Mansour, Asem
author_facet Al-Ibraheem, Akram
Anwer, Farah
Juweid, Malik E.
Shagera, Qaid Ahmed
Khalaf, Aysar N.
Obeidat, Shahed
Mansour, Areen
Ma’koseh, Mohammad
Halahleh, Khalid
Jaradat, Imad
Almasri, Nidal
Mansour, Asem
author_sort Al-Ibraheem, Akram
collection PubMed
description The aim of the study was to assess the predictive value of interim FDG-PET/CT (iPET) in patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) treated with Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy. A total of 245 consecutive patients with de novo HL between 12/2013 and 12/2017 were evaluated retrospectively. All patients were treated with upfront ABVD, performed PET/CT scans at baseline, after 2 cycles (interim PET, iPET2) or 4 cycles (iPET4) and at the end of therapy, and followed up for at least 6 months after therapy. The response status on iPET was defined according to the standard five-point Deauville scores (DS) as follows: complete metabolic response (CMR, DS 1–3) and non-complete metabolic response (nCMR) (DS 4 and 5). End-of-treatment (EoT) response was assessed by FDG-PET/CT and if needed biopsy confirmation of PET-positive findings. The association between iPET and EoT response was investigated using logistic regression analysis. Survival analysis was performed using the Cox regression hazard model and Kaplan–Meier methods. Sixty-nine patients underwent iPET-2 and 176 iPET-4. No association was found between the timing of iPET and iPET response status (P-value = 0.71). Two hundred and one patients (82%) had iPET-CMR and 44 (18%) iPET -nCMR. iPET was strongly associated with EoT response status: 194/201 (96 .5%) of iPET-CMR had a complete response at the EoT while only 21/44 (47.7%) of patients with iPET-nCMR presented a complete response at EoT (P-value < 0.0001). The median follow-up was 32 months (range 6–81). Patients with iPET-CMR presented a better outcome with 91% 3 y event-free-survival (EFS) and 95% 3 y overall survival (OS) than those with iPET-nCMR (41 and 86%, respectively, P-value < 0.0001). In multivariable analyses, iPET retained an independent prognostic factor of EFS and OS (P-value < 0.0001 and P-value = 0.002, respectively). iPET is highly predictive of outcome of HL patients treated with ABVD and allows to tailor therapy to the individual patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9587214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95872142022-10-23 Interim FDG-PET/CT for therapy monitoring and prognostication in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Al-Ibraheem, Akram Anwer, Farah Juweid, Malik E. Shagera, Qaid Ahmed Khalaf, Aysar N. Obeidat, Shahed Mansour, Areen Ma’koseh, Mohammad Halahleh, Khalid Jaradat, Imad Almasri, Nidal Mansour, Asem Sci Rep Article The aim of the study was to assess the predictive value of interim FDG-PET/CT (iPET) in patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) treated with Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy. A total of 245 consecutive patients with de novo HL between 12/2013 and 12/2017 were evaluated retrospectively. All patients were treated with upfront ABVD, performed PET/CT scans at baseline, after 2 cycles (interim PET, iPET2) or 4 cycles (iPET4) and at the end of therapy, and followed up for at least 6 months after therapy. The response status on iPET was defined according to the standard five-point Deauville scores (DS) as follows: complete metabolic response (CMR, DS 1–3) and non-complete metabolic response (nCMR) (DS 4 and 5). End-of-treatment (EoT) response was assessed by FDG-PET/CT and if needed biopsy confirmation of PET-positive findings. The association between iPET and EoT response was investigated using logistic regression analysis. Survival analysis was performed using the Cox regression hazard model and Kaplan–Meier methods. Sixty-nine patients underwent iPET-2 and 176 iPET-4. No association was found between the timing of iPET and iPET response status (P-value = 0.71). Two hundred and one patients (82%) had iPET-CMR and 44 (18%) iPET -nCMR. iPET was strongly associated with EoT response status: 194/201 (96 .5%) of iPET-CMR had a complete response at the EoT while only 21/44 (47.7%) of patients with iPET-nCMR presented a complete response at EoT (P-value < 0.0001). The median follow-up was 32 months (range 6–81). Patients with iPET-CMR presented a better outcome with 91% 3 y event-free-survival (EFS) and 95% 3 y overall survival (OS) than those with iPET-nCMR (41 and 86%, respectively, P-value < 0.0001). In multivariable analyses, iPET retained an independent prognostic factor of EFS and OS (P-value < 0.0001 and P-value = 0.002, respectively). iPET is highly predictive of outcome of HL patients treated with ABVD and allows to tailor therapy to the individual patient. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9587214/ /pubmed/36271128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22032-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Al-Ibraheem, Akram
Anwer, Farah
Juweid, Malik E.
Shagera, Qaid Ahmed
Khalaf, Aysar N.
Obeidat, Shahed
Mansour, Areen
Ma’koseh, Mohammad
Halahleh, Khalid
Jaradat, Imad
Almasri, Nidal
Mansour, Asem
Interim FDG-PET/CT for therapy monitoring and prognostication in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
title Interim FDG-PET/CT for therapy monitoring and prognostication in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
title_full Interim FDG-PET/CT for therapy monitoring and prognostication in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
title_fullStr Interim FDG-PET/CT for therapy monitoring and prognostication in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
title_full_unstemmed Interim FDG-PET/CT for therapy monitoring and prognostication in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
title_short Interim FDG-PET/CT for therapy monitoring and prognostication in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
title_sort interim fdg-pet/ct for therapy monitoring and prognostication in hodgkin’s lymphoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36271128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22032-3
work_keys_str_mv AT alibraheemakram interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma
AT anwerfarah interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma
AT juweidmalike interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma
AT shageraqaidahmed interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma
AT khalafaysarn interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma
AT obeidatshahed interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma
AT mansourareen interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma
AT makosehmohammad interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma
AT halahlehkhalid interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma
AT jaradatimad interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma
AT almasrinidal interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma
AT mansourasem interimfdgpetctfortherapymonitoringandprognosticationinhodgkinslymphoma