Cargando…

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study on the Efficacy of Different Modes of Topical Application of Nasal Anesthetics in the Diagnostic Nasal Endoscopy Procedure

Introduction In the current otorhinolaryngology practice, technology has always been an essential part. Therefore, diagnostic nasal endoscopy (DNE) has become a vital examination in today’s practice. In order to visualize the nasal cavity in a systematic manner without any discomfort to both patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Velayutham, Prabu, Davis, Prem, Ravichandran, Surya, John, Joemol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36299946
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29436
_version_ 1784813897351430144
author Velayutham, Prabu
Davis, Prem
Ravichandran, Surya
John, Joemol
author_facet Velayutham, Prabu
Davis, Prem
Ravichandran, Surya
John, Joemol
author_sort Velayutham, Prabu
collection PubMed
description Introduction In the current otorhinolaryngology practice, technology has always been an essential part. Therefore, diagnostic nasal endoscopy (DNE) has become a vital examination in today’s practice. In order to visualize the nasal cavity in a systematic manner without any discomfort to both patient and doctor, the nose should be well anesthetized and decongested. Objective The study is to compare and evaluate the efficacy of 4% lignocaine-oxymetazoline cotton pledget packing versus topical sprays in the preparation of nasal cavities for DNE. Methodology The prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted among 246 patients and was divided into two groups. In the first group, the nose was packed with cotton pledgets containing 4% lignocaine-oxymetazoline and another group with 4% lignocaine-oxymetazoline spray. Following DNE, patients and surgeons were questioned on a pre-formed questionnaire to evaluate their experience during the procedure. Results It was observed that the time taken for the pre-endoscopic preparation of the packing group was more than the spray group. A total of 91.9% of the spray group had pain during the pre-endoscopic preparation and more burning and tingling sensation than in the nasal pack (75.6%). A total of 69.9% of the patients among the spray group participants compared to 32.5% of the packing group patients experienced more throat discomfort. In addition, 12% of the packing group had mucosal bleeding during the preparation. A total of 32.5% of the spray group experienced severe pain when compared to 12.2% of the packing group during the endoscopic procedure. Most of the participants from both groups had difficulty visualizing the superior turbinate and sphenoethmoidal recess during the procedure. There was a significant difference seen between both the groups with respect to pain during the pre-endoscopic procedure (p=0.0005), burning/tingling sensation (p<0.0001), throat pain (<0.0001), mucosal bleed (p=0.0003), pain during the procedure (p=0.0001), and discomfort after the procedure (p<0.0001). Conclusion Both methods of nasal preparation have merits and demerits in terms of discomfort, pain, and visualization of structures. Still, the packing of the nasal cavity with cotton pledgets is better when compared to spraying with 4% lignocaine-oxymetazoline. However, 4% lignocaine-oxymetazoline spray can be used during an emergency situation and with sensitive patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9587382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95873822022-10-25 A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study on the Efficacy of Different Modes of Topical Application of Nasal Anesthetics in the Diagnostic Nasal Endoscopy Procedure Velayutham, Prabu Davis, Prem Ravichandran, Surya John, Joemol Cureus Family/General Practice Introduction In the current otorhinolaryngology practice, technology has always been an essential part. Therefore, diagnostic nasal endoscopy (DNE) has become a vital examination in today’s practice. In order to visualize the nasal cavity in a systematic manner without any discomfort to both patient and doctor, the nose should be well anesthetized and decongested. Objective The study is to compare and evaluate the efficacy of 4% lignocaine-oxymetazoline cotton pledget packing versus topical sprays in the preparation of nasal cavities for DNE. Methodology The prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted among 246 patients and was divided into two groups. In the first group, the nose was packed with cotton pledgets containing 4% lignocaine-oxymetazoline and another group with 4% lignocaine-oxymetazoline spray. Following DNE, patients and surgeons were questioned on a pre-formed questionnaire to evaluate their experience during the procedure. Results It was observed that the time taken for the pre-endoscopic preparation of the packing group was more than the spray group. A total of 91.9% of the spray group had pain during the pre-endoscopic preparation and more burning and tingling sensation than in the nasal pack (75.6%). A total of 69.9% of the patients among the spray group participants compared to 32.5% of the packing group patients experienced more throat discomfort. In addition, 12% of the packing group had mucosal bleeding during the preparation. A total of 32.5% of the spray group experienced severe pain when compared to 12.2% of the packing group during the endoscopic procedure. Most of the participants from both groups had difficulty visualizing the superior turbinate and sphenoethmoidal recess during the procedure. There was a significant difference seen between both the groups with respect to pain during the pre-endoscopic procedure (p=0.0005), burning/tingling sensation (p<0.0001), throat pain (<0.0001), mucosal bleed (p=0.0003), pain during the procedure (p=0.0001), and discomfort after the procedure (p<0.0001). Conclusion Both methods of nasal preparation have merits and demerits in terms of discomfort, pain, and visualization of structures. Still, the packing of the nasal cavity with cotton pledgets is better when compared to spraying with 4% lignocaine-oxymetazoline. However, 4% lignocaine-oxymetazoline spray can be used during an emergency situation and with sensitive patients. Cureus 2022-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9587382/ /pubmed/36299946 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29436 Text en Copyright © 2022, Velayutham et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Family/General Practice
Velayutham, Prabu
Davis, Prem
Ravichandran, Surya
John, Joemol
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study on the Efficacy of Different Modes of Topical Application of Nasal Anesthetics in the Diagnostic Nasal Endoscopy Procedure
title A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study on the Efficacy of Different Modes of Topical Application of Nasal Anesthetics in the Diagnostic Nasal Endoscopy Procedure
title_full A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study on the Efficacy of Different Modes of Topical Application of Nasal Anesthetics in the Diagnostic Nasal Endoscopy Procedure
title_fullStr A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study on the Efficacy of Different Modes of Topical Application of Nasal Anesthetics in the Diagnostic Nasal Endoscopy Procedure
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study on the Efficacy of Different Modes of Topical Application of Nasal Anesthetics in the Diagnostic Nasal Endoscopy Procedure
title_short A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study on the Efficacy of Different Modes of Topical Application of Nasal Anesthetics in the Diagnostic Nasal Endoscopy Procedure
title_sort prospective, randomized, double-blind study on the efficacy of different modes of topical application of nasal anesthetics in the diagnostic nasal endoscopy procedure
topic Family/General Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36299946
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29436
work_keys_str_mv AT velayuthamprabu aprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudyontheefficacyofdifferentmodesoftopicalapplicationofnasalanestheticsinthediagnosticnasalendoscopyprocedure
AT davisprem aprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudyontheefficacyofdifferentmodesoftopicalapplicationofnasalanestheticsinthediagnosticnasalendoscopyprocedure
AT ravichandransurya aprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudyontheefficacyofdifferentmodesoftopicalapplicationofnasalanestheticsinthediagnosticnasalendoscopyprocedure
AT johnjoemol aprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudyontheefficacyofdifferentmodesoftopicalapplicationofnasalanestheticsinthediagnosticnasalendoscopyprocedure
AT velayuthamprabu prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudyontheefficacyofdifferentmodesoftopicalapplicationofnasalanestheticsinthediagnosticnasalendoscopyprocedure
AT davisprem prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudyontheefficacyofdifferentmodesoftopicalapplicationofnasalanestheticsinthediagnosticnasalendoscopyprocedure
AT ravichandransurya prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudyontheefficacyofdifferentmodesoftopicalapplicationofnasalanestheticsinthediagnosticnasalendoscopyprocedure
AT johnjoemol prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudyontheefficacyofdifferentmodesoftopicalapplicationofnasalanestheticsinthediagnosticnasalendoscopyprocedure