Cargando…

Long‐term annual and spatial variation of polygyny in the white‐throated dipper (Cinclus cinclus)

Mating strategies are key components in the fitness of organisms, and notably in birds the occurrence of monogamy versus polygyny has attracted wide interest. We address this by a very comprehensive dataset (2899 breeding events spanning the years 1978–2019) of the white‐throated dipper Cinclus cinc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walseng, Bjørn, Durant, Joël M., Hessen, Dag O., Jerstad, Kurt, Nilsson, Anna L. K., Røstad, Ole W., Slagsvold, Tore
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36284517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9416
_version_ 1784813906297880576
author Walseng, Bjørn
Durant, Joël M.
Hessen, Dag O.
Jerstad, Kurt
Nilsson, Anna L. K.
Røstad, Ole W.
Slagsvold, Tore
author_facet Walseng, Bjørn
Durant, Joël M.
Hessen, Dag O.
Jerstad, Kurt
Nilsson, Anna L. K.
Røstad, Ole W.
Slagsvold, Tore
author_sort Walseng, Bjørn
collection PubMed
description Mating strategies are key components in the fitness of organisms, and notably in birds the occurrence of monogamy versus polygyny has attracted wide interest. We address this by a very comprehensive dataset (2899 breeding events spanning the years 1978–2019) of the white‐throated dipper Cinclus cinclus. Though the mating system of this species has been regarded as generally monogamous, we find that 7% of all breeding events were performed by polygynous males (approximately 15% of all pairs). The fraction of polygyny has been stable over the entire study period irrespective of population size. The assumption that polygyny is most common at low population density was not supported. Surprisingly, there was no difference between polygynous and monogamous males with regard to the quality of the territories they inhabited, ranked according to their overall frequency of use. The most common age group, first‐year breeders, dominated among monogamous males, while among polygynous males second‐year breeders were most common, followed by third and first‐year breeders. The primary females were in general older than females mated to monogamous males, also when controlled for their general frequency in the population. The majority of the two females mated to a polygynous male, bred in the vicinity of each other. The probability for a male to be involved in polygyny more than once, was significantly higher than by chance, suggesting phenotypic quality differences among males.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9587462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95874622022-10-24 Long‐term annual and spatial variation of polygyny in the white‐throated dipper (Cinclus cinclus) Walseng, Bjørn Durant, Joël M. Hessen, Dag O. Jerstad, Kurt Nilsson, Anna L. K. Røstad, Ole W. Slagsvold, Tore Ecol Evol Research Articles Mating strategies are key components in the fitness of organisms, and notably in birds the occurrence of monogamy versus polygyny has attracted wide interest. We address this by a very comprehensive dataset (2899 breeding events spanning the years 1978–2019) of the white‐throated dipper Cinclus cinclus. Though the mating system of this species has been regarded as generally monogamous, we find that 7% of all breeding events were performed by polygynous males (approximately 15% of all pairs). The fraction of polygyny has been stable over the entire study period irrespective of population size. The assumption that polygyny is most common at low population density was not supported. Surprisingly, there was no difference between polygynous and monogamous males with regard to the quality of the territories they inhabited, ranked according to their overall frequency of use. The most common age group, first‐year breeders, dominated among monogamous males, while among polygynous males second‐year breeders were most common, followed by third and first‐year breeders. The primary females were in general older than females mated to monogamous males, also when controlled for their general frequency in the population. The majority of the two females mated to a polygynous male, bred in the vicinity of each other. The probability for a male to be involved in polygyny more than once, was significantly higher than by chance, suggesting phenotypic quality differences among males. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9587462/ /pubmed/36284517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9416 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Walseng, Bjørn
Durant, Joël M.
Hessen, Dag O.
Jerstad, Kurt
Nilsson, Anna L. K.
Røstad, Ole W.
Slagsvold, Tore
Long‐term annual and spatial variation of polygyny in the white‐throated dipper (Cinclus cinclus)
title Long‐term annual and spatial variation of polygyny in the white‐throated dipper (Cinclus cinclus)
title_full Long‐term annual and spatial variation of polygyny in the white‐throated dipper (Cinclus cinclus)
title_fullStr Long‐term annual and spatial variation of polygyny in the white‐throated dipper (Cinclus cinclus)
title_full_unstemmed Long‐term annual and spatial variation of polygyny in the white‐throated dipper (Cinclus cinclus)
title_short Long‐term annual and spatial variation of polygyny in the white‐throated dipper (Cinclus cinclus)
title_sort long‐term annual and spatial variation of polygyny in the white‐throated dipper (cinclus cinclus)
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36284517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9416
work_keys_str_mv AT walsengbjørn longtermannualandspatialvariationofpolygynyinthewhitethroateddippercincluscinclus
AT durantjoelm longtermannualandspatialvariationofpolygynyinthewhitethroateddippercincluscinclus
AT hessendago longtermannualandspatialvariationofpolygynyinthewhitethroateddippercincluscinclus
AT jerstadkurt longtermannualandspatialvariationofpolygynyinthewhitethroateddippercincluscinclus
AT nilssonannalk longtermannualandspatialvariationofpolygynyinthewhitethroateddippercincluscinclus
AT røstadolew longtermannualandspatialvariationofpolygynyinthewhitethroateddippercincluscinclus
AT slagsvoldtore longtermannualandspatialvariationofpolygynyinthewhitethroateddippercincluscinclus