Cargando…
Analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine versus morphine for perioperative tumor ablation: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial
BACKGROUND: The study will compare the efficacy and safety of nalbuphine hydrochloride injection and morphine hydrochloride injection for perioperative analgesia in tumor ablation and the differences between the two groups regarding duration of surgery, average daily dose, patient satisfaction with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36273202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06825-5 |
_version_ | 1784813924104798208 |
---|---|
author | Xue, Youhua Huang, Zhengli Cheng, Bingwei Sun, Jie Zhu, Haidong Tang, Yuting Wang, Xiaoyan |
author_facet | Xue, Youhua Huang, Zhengli Cheng, Bingwei Sun, Jie Zhu, Haidong Tang, Yuting Wang, Xiaoyan |
author_sort | Xue, Youhua |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The study will compare the efficacy and safety of nalbuphine hydrochloride injection and morphine hydrochloride injection for perioperative analgesia in tumor ablation and the differences between the two groups regarding duration of surgery, average daily dose, patient satisfaction with analgesia, quality of life, and other indicators. Furthermore, it will evaluate the clinical application of nalbuphine and morphine for perioperative analgesia in ablation surgery and provides important reference and guidance for clinical practice. METHODS: This is a randomized controlled study. Patients who were diagnosed by clinicians and required tumor ablation are enrolled and randomized to the experimental groups. In the test group, nalbuphine 80 mg + 0.9% normal saline (72 ml) is set in the patient-controlled analgesia pump, which is connected 15 min before ablation under electrocardiogram monitoring and surgery is performed immediately. The doses are as follows: initial,: 0.15 ml/kg,; background:, 0.5 ml/h,; compression:, 2 ml,; and lockout time:, 15 min. If the numeric rating scale is ≥ 4 points, the drug is administered by compression. The control group receives similar treatment under similar conditions as the test group except morphine (80 mg) is administered instead of nalbuphine (80 mg). The primary endpoints are the effective rate of analgesia and the incidence of adverse reactions (nausea and vomiting, dizziness, itching, constipation, hypoxemia, and urinary retention); the secondary endpoints are pain intensity, satisfaction with analgesia, duration of surgery, postoperative hospital stay, average daily dose, uninterrupted completion rate of surgery without complaints of pain, quality of life assessment, and vital signs. DISCUSSION: This study, to the best of our knowledge, is the first randomized controlled trial of nalbuphine patient-controlled analgesia in ablation surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: U.S. Clinical Trials Network Registration No.: NCT05073744. Registered on 11 October, 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06825-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9587534 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95875342022-10-23 Analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine versus morphine for perioperative tumor ablation: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial Xue, Youhua Huang, Zhengli Cheng, Bingwei Sun, Jie Zhu, Haidong Tang, Yuting Wang, Xiaoyan Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The study will compare the efficacy and safety of nalbuphine hydrochloride injection and morphine hydrochloride injection for perioperative analgesia in tumor ablation and the differences between the two groups regarding duration of surgery, average daily dose, patient satisfaction with analgesia, quality of life, and other indicators. Furthermore, it will evaluate the clinical application of nalbuphine and morphine for perioperative analgesia in ablation surgery and provides important reference and guidance for clinical practice. METHODS: This is a randomized controlled study. Patients who were diagnosed by clinicians and required tumor ablation are enrolled and randomized to the experimental groups. In the test group, nalbuphine 80 mg + 0.9% normal saline (72 ml) is set in the patient-controlled analgesia pump, which is connected 15 min before ablation under electrocardiogram monitoring and surgery is performed immediately. The doses are as follows: initial,: 0.15 ml/kg,; background:, 0.5 ml/h,; compression:, 2 ml,; and lockout time:, 15 min. If the numeric rating scale is ≥ 4 points, the drug is administered by compression. The control group receives similar treatment under similar conditions as the test group except morphine (80 mg) is administered instead of nalbuphine (80 mg). The primary endpoints are the effective rate of analgesia and the incidence of adverse reactions (nausea and vomiting, dizziness, itching, constipation, hypoxemia, and urinary retention); the secondary endpoints are pain intensity, satisfaction with analgesia, duration of surgery, postoperative hospital stay, average daily dose, uninterrupted completion rate of surgery without complaints of pain, quality of life assessment, and vital signs. DISCUSSION: This study, to the best of our knowledge, is the first randomized controlled trial of nalbuphine patient-controlled analgesia in ablation surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: U.S. Clinical Trials Network Registration No.: NCT05073744. Registered on 11 October, 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06825-5. BioMed Central 2022-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9587534/ /pubmed/36273202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06825-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Xue, Youhua Huang, Zhengli Cheng, Bingwei Sun, Jie Zhu, Haidong Tang, Yuting Wang, Xiaoyan Analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine versus morphine for perioperative tumor ablation: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial |
title | Analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine versus morphine for perioperative tumor ablation: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial |
title_full | Analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine versus morphine for perioperative tumor ablation: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial |
title_fullStr | Analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine versus morphine for perioperative tumor ablation: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine versus morphine for perioperative tumor ablation: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial |
title_short | Analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine versus morphine for perioperative tumor ablation: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial |
title_sort | analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine versus morphine for perioperative tumor ablation: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36273202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06825-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xueyouhua analgesicefficacyandsafetyofnalbuphineversusmorphineforperioperativetumorablationarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial AT huangzhengli analgesicefficacyandsafetyofnalbuphineversusmorphineforperioperativetumorablationarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial AT chengbingwei analgesicefficacyandsafetyofnalbuphineversusmorphineforperioperativetumorablationarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial AT sunjie analgesicefficacyandsafetyofnalbuphineversusmorphineforperioperativetumorablationarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial AT zhuhaidong analgesicefficacyandsafetyofnalbuphineversusmorphineforperioperativetumorablationarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial AT tangyuting analgesicefficacyandsafetyofnalbuphineversusmorphineforperioperativetumorablationarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial AT wangxiaoyan analgesicefficacyandsafetyofnalbuphineversusmorphineforperioperativetumorablationarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial |