Cargando…

Analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine versus morphine for perioperative tumor ablation: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial

BACKGROUND: The study will compare the efficacy and safety of nalbuphine hydrochloride injection and morphine hydrochloride injection for perioperative analgesia in tumor ablation and the differences between the two groups regarding duration of surgery, average daily dose, patient satisfaction with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xue, Youhua, Huang, Zhengli, Cheng, Bingwei, Sun, Jie, Zhu, Haidong, Tang, Yuting, Wang, Xiaoyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36273202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06825-5
_version_ 1784813924104798208
author Xue, Youhua
Huang, Zhengli
Cheng, Bingwei
Sun, Jie
Zhu, Haidong
Tang, Yuting
Wang, Xiaoyan
author_facet Xue, Youhua
Huang, Zhengli
Cheng, Bingwei
Sun, Jie
Zhu, Haidong
Tang, Yuting
Wang, Xiaoyan
author_sort Xue, Youhua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The study will compare the efficacy and safety of nalbuphine hydrochloride injection and morphine hydrochloride injection for perioperative analgesia in tumor ablation and the differences between the two groups regarding duration of surgery, average daily dose, patient satisfaction with analgesia, quality of life, and other indicators. Furthermore, it will evaluate the clinical application of nalbuphine and morphine for perioperative analgesia in ablation surgery and provides important reference and guidance for clinical practice. METHODS: This is a randomized controlled study. Patients who were diagnosed by clinicians and required tumor ablation are enrolled and randomized to the experimental groups. In the test group, nalbuphine 80 mg + 0.9% normal saline (72 ml) is set in the patient-controlled analgesia pump, which is connected 15 min before ablation under electrocardiogram monitoring and surgery is performed immediately. The doses are as follows: initial,: 0.15 ml/kg,; background:, 0.5 ml/h,; compression:, 2 ml,; and lockout time:, 15 min. If the numeric rating scale is ≥ 4 points, the drug is administered by compression. The control group receives similar treatment under similar conditions as the test group except morphine (80 mg) is administered instead of nalbuphine (80 mg). The primary endpoints are the effective rate of analgesia and the incidence of adverse reactions (nausea and vomiting, dizziness, itching, constipation, hypoxemia, and urinary retention); the secondary endpoints are pain intensity, satisfaction with analgesia, duration of surgery, postoperative hospital stay, average daily dose, uninterrupted completion rate of surgery without complaints of pain, quality of life assessment, and vital signs. DISCUSSION: This study, to the best of our knowledge, is the first randomized controlled trial of nalbuphine patient-controlled analgesia in ablation surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: U.S. Clinical Trials Network Registration No.: NCT05073744. Registered on 11 October, 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06825-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9587534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95875342022-10-23 Analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine versus morphine for perioperative tumor ablation: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial Xue, Youhua Huang, Zhengli Cheng, Bingwei Sun, Jie Zhu, Haidong Tang, Yuting Wang, Xiaoyan Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The study will compare the efficacy and safety of nalbuphine hydrochloride injection and morphine hydrochloride injection for perioperative analgesia in tumor ablation and the differences between the two groups regarding duration of surgery, average daily dose, patient satisfaction with analgesia, quality of life, and other indicators. Furthermore, it will evaluate the clinical application of nalbuphine and morphine for perioperative analgesia in ablation surgery and provides important reference and guidance for clinical practice. METHODS: This is a randomized controlled study. Patients who were diagnosed by clinicians and required tumor ablation are enrolled and randomized to the experimental groups. In the test group, nalbuphine 80 mg + 0.9% normal saline (72 ml) is set in the patient-controlled analgesia pump, which is connected 15 min before ablation under electrocardiogram monitoring and surgery is performed immediately. The doses are as follows: initial,: 0.15 ml/kg,; background:, 0.5 ml/h,; compression:, 2 ml,; and lockout time:, 15 min. If the numeric rating scale is ≥ 4 points, the drug is administered by compression. The control group receives similar treatment under similar conditions as the test group except morphine (80 mg) is administered instead of nalbuphine (80 mg). The primary endpoints are the effective rate of analgesia and the incidence of adverse reactions (nausea and vomiting, dizziness, itching, constipation, hypoxemia, and urinary retention); the secondary endpoints are pain intensity, satisfaction with analgesia, duration of surgery, postoperative hospital stay, average daily dose, uninterrupted completion rate of surgery without complaints of pain, quality of life assessment, and vital signs. DISCUSSION: This study, to the best of our knowledge, is the first randomized controlled trial of nalbuphine patient-controlled analgesia in ablation surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: U.S. Clinical Trials Network Registration No.: NCT05073744. Registered on 11 October, 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06825-5. BioMed Central 2022-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9587534/ /pubmed/36273202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06825-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Xue, Youhua
Huang, Zhengli
Cheng, Bingwei
Sun, Jie
Zhu, Haidong
Tang, Yuting
Wang, Xiaoyan
Analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine versus morphine for perioperative tumor ablation: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial
title Analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine versus morphine for perioperative tumor ablation: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial
title_full Analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine versus morphine for perioperative tumor ablation: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial
title_fullStr Analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine versus morphine for perioperative tumor ablation: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial
title_full_unstemmed Analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine versus morphine for perioperative tumor ablation: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial
title_short Analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine versus morphine for perioperative tumor ablation: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial
title_sort analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine versus morphine for perioperative tumor ablation: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36273202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06825-5
work_keys_str_mv AT xueyouhua analgesicefficacyandsafetyofnalbuphineversusmorphineforperioperativetumorablationarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial
AT huangzhengli analgesicefficacyandsafetyofnalbuphineversusmorphineforperioperativetumorablationarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial
AT chengbingwei analgesicefficacyandsafetyofnalbuphineversusmorphineforperioperativetumorablationarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial
AT sunjie analgesicefficacyandsafetyofnalbuphineversusmorphineforperioperativetumorablationarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial
AT zhuhaidong analgesicefficacyandsafetyofnalbuphineversusmorphineforperioperativetumorablationarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial
AT tangyuting analgesicefficacyandsafetyofnalbuphineversusmorphineforperioperativetumorablationarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial
AT wangxiaoyan analgesicefficacyandsafetyofnalbuphineversusmorphineforperioperativetumorablationarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial