Cargando…
Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography
OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate that radiologists, with the help of artificial intelligence (AI), are able to better classify screening mammograms into the correct breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) category, and as a secondary objective, to explore the impact of AI on cancer detection an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Nature Singapore
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35763243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12282-022-01375-9 |
_version_ | 1784814012053061632 |
---|---|
author | Dang, Lan-Anh Chazard, Emmanuel Poncelet, Edouard Serb, Teodora Rusu, Aniela Pauwels, Xavier Parsy, Clémence Poclet, Thibault Cauliez, Hugo Engelaere, Constance Ramette, Guillaume Brienne, Charlotte Dujardin, Sofiane Laurent, Nicolas |
author_facet | Dang, Lan-Anh Chazard, Emmanuel Poncelet, Edouard Serb, Teodora Rusu, Aniela Pauwels, Xavier Parsy, Clémence Poclet, Thibault Cauliez, Hugo Engelaere, Constance Ramette, Guillaume Brienne, Charlotte Dujardin, Sofiane Laurent, Nicolas |
author_sort | Dang, Lan-Anh |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate that radiologists, with the help of artificial intelligence (AI), are able to better classify screening mammograms into the correct breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) category, and as a secondary objective, to explore the impact of AI on cancer detection and mammogram interpretation time. METHODS: A multi-reader, multi-case study with cross-over design, was performed, including 314 mammograms. Twelve radiologists interpreted the examinations in two sessions delayed by a 4 weeks wash-out period with and without AI support. For each breast of each mammogram, they had to mark the most suspicious lesion (if any) and assign it with a forced BI-RADS category and a level of suspicion or “continuous BI-RADS 100”. Cohen’s kappa correlation coefficient evaluating the inter-observer agreement for BI-RADS category per breast, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), were used as metrics and analyzed. RESULTS: On average, the quadratic kappa coefficient increased significantly when using AI for all readers [κ = 0.549, 95% CI (0.528–0.571) without AI and κ = 0.626, 95% CI (0.607–0.6455) with AI]. AUC was significantly improved when using AI (0.74 vs 0.77, p = 0.004). Reading time was not significantly affected for all readers (106 s without AI and vs 102 s with AI; p = 0.754). CONCLUSIONS: When using AI, radiologists were able to better assign mammograms with the correct BI-RADS category without slowing down the interpretation time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9587927 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Nature Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95879272022-10-24 Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography Dang, Lan-Anh Chazard, Emmanuel Poncelet, Edouard Serb, Teodora Rusu, Aniela Pauwels, Xavier Parsy, Clémence Poclet, Thibault Cauliez, Hugo Engelaere, Constance Ramette, Guillaume Brienne, Charlotte Dujardin, Sofiane Laurent, Nicolas Breast Cancer Original Article OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate that radiologists, with the help of artificial intelligence (AI), are able to better classify screening mammograms into the correct breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) category, and as a secondary objective, to explore the impact of AI on cancer detection and mammogram interpretation time. METHODS: A multi-reader, multi-case study with cross-over design, was performed, including 314 mammograms. Twelve radiologists interpreted the examinations in two sessions delayed by a 4 weeks wash-out period with and without AI support. For each breast of each mammogram, they had to mark the most suspicious lesion (if any) and assign it with a forced BI-RADS category and a level of suspicion or “continuous BI-RADS 100”. Cohen’s kappa correlation coefficient evaluating the inter-observer agreement for BI-RADS category per breast, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), were used as metrics and analyzed. RESULTS: On average, the quadratic kappa coefficient increased significantly when using AI for all readers [κ = 0.549, 95% CI (0.528–0.571) without AI and κ = 0.626, 95% CI (0.607–0.6455) with AI]. AUC was significantly improved when using AI (0.74 vs 0.77, p = 0.004). Reading time was not significantly affected for all readers (106 s without AI and vs 102 s with AI; p = 0.754). CONCLUSIONS: When using AI, radiologists were able to better assign mammograms with the correct BI-RADS category without slowing down the interpretation time. Springer Nature Singapore 2022-06-28 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9587927/ /pubmed/35763243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12282-022-01375-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dang, Lan-Anh Chazard, Emmanuel Poncelet, Edouard Serb, Teodora Rusu, Aniela Pauwels, Xavier Parsy, Clémence Poclet, Thibault Cauliez, Hugo Engelaere, Constance Ramette, Guillaume Brienne, Charlotte Dujardin, Sofiane Laurent, Nicolas Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography |
title | Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography |
title_full | Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography |
title_fullStr | Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography |
title_short | Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography |
title_sort | impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35763243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12282-022-01375-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT danglananh impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography AT chazardemmanuel impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography AT ponceletedouard impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography AT serbteodora impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography AT rusuaniela impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography AT pauwelsxavier impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography AT parsyclemence impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography AT pocletthibault impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography AT cauliezhugo impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography AT engelaereconstance impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography AT rametteguillaume impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography AT briennecharlotte impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography AT dujardinsofiane impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography AT laurentnicolas impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography |