Cargando…

Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate that radiologists, with the help of artificial intelligence (AI), are able to better classify screening mammograms into the correct breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) category, and as a secondary objective, to explore the impact of AI on cancer detection an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dang, Lan-Anh, Chazard, Emmanuel, Poncelet, Edouard, Serb, Teodora, Rusu, Aniela, Pauwels, Xavier, Parsy, Clémence, Poclet, Thibault, Cauliez, Hugo, Engelaere, Constance, Ramette, Guillaume, Brienne, Charlotte, Dujardin, Sofiane, Laurent, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Nature Singapore 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35763243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12282-022-01375-9
_version_ 1784814012053061632
author Dang, Lan-Anh
Chazard, Emmanuel
Poncelet, Edouard
Serb, Teodora
Rusu, Aniela
Pauwels, Xavier
Parsy, Clémence
Poclet, Thibault
Cauliez, Hugo
Engelaere, Constance
Ramette, Guillaume
Brienne, Charlotte
Dujardin, Sofiane
Laurent, Nicolas
author_facet Dang, Lan-Anh
Chazard, Emmanuel
Poncelet, Edouard
Serb, Teodora
Rusu, Aniela
Pauwels, Xavier
Parsy, Clémence
Poclet, Thibault
Cauliez, Hugo
Engelaere, Constance
Ramette, Guillaume
Brienne, Charlotte
Dujardin, Sofiane
Laurent, Nicolas
author_sort Dang, Lan-Anh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate that radiologists, with the help of artificial intelligence (AI), are able to better classify screening mammograms into the correct breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) category, and as a secondary objective, to explore the impact of AI on cancer detection and mammogram interpretation time. METHODS: A multi-reader, multi-case study with cross-over design, was performed, including 314 mammograms. Twelve radiologists interpreted the examinations in two sessions delayed by a 4 weeks wash-out period with and without AI support. For each breast of each mammogram, they had to mark the most suspicious lesion (if any) and assign it with a forced BI-RADS category and a level of suspicion or “continuous BI-RADS 100”. Cohen’s kappa correlation coefficient evaluating the inter-observer agreement for BI-RADS category per breast, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), were used as metrics and analyzed. RESULTS: On average, the quadratic kappa coefficient increased significantly when using AI for all readers [κ = 0.549, 95% CI (0.528–0.571) without AI and κ = 0.626, 95% CI (0.607–0.6455) with AI]. AUC was significantly improved when using AI (0.74 vs 0.77, p = 0.004). Reading time was not significantly affected for all readers (106 s without AI and vs 102 s with AI; p = 0.754). CONCLUSIONS: When using AI, radiologists were able to better assign mammograms with the correct BI-RADS category without slowing down the interpretation time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9587927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Nature Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95879272022-10-24 Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography Dang, Lan-Anh Chazard, Emmanuel Poncelet, Edouard Serb, Teodora Rusu, Aniela Pauwels, Xavier Parsy, Clémence Poclet, Thibault Cauliez, Hugo Engelaere, Constance Ramette, Guillaume Brienne, Charlotte Dujardin, Sofiane Laurent, Nicolas Breast Cancer Original Article OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate that radiologists, with the help of artificial intelligence (AI), are able to better classify screening mammograms into the correct breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) category, and as a secondary objective, to explore the impact of AI on cancer detection and mammogram interpretation time. METHODS: A multi-reader, multi-case study with cross-over design, was performed, including 314 mammograms. Twelve radiologists interpreted the examinations in two sessions delayed by a 4 weeks wash-out period with and without AI support. For each breast of each mammogram, they had to mark the most suspicious lesion (if any) and assign it with a forced BI-RADS category and a level of suspicion or “continuous BI-RADS 100”. Cohen’s kappa correlation coefficient evaluating the inter-observer agreement for BI-RADS category per breast, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), were used as metrics and analyzed. RESULTS: On average, the quadratic kappa coefficient increased significantly when using AI for all readers [κ = 0.549, 95% CI (0.528–0.571) without AI and κ = 0.626, 95% CI (0.607–0.6455) with AI]. AUC was significantly improved when using AI (0.74 vs 0.77, p = 0.004). Reading time was not significantly affected for all readers (106 s without AI and vs 102 s with AI; p = 0.754). CONCLUSIONS: When using AI, radiologists were able to better assign mammograms with the correct BI-RADS category without slowing down the interpretation time. Springer Nature Singapore 2022-06-28 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9587927/ /pubmed/35763243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12282-022-01375-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Dang, Lan-Anh
Chazard, Emmanuel
Poncelet, Edouard
Serb, Teodora
Rusu, Aniela
Pauwels, Xavier
Parsy, Clémence
Poclet, Thibault
Cauliez, Hugo
Engelaere, Constance
Ramette, Guillaume
Brienne, Charlotte
Dujardin, Sofiane
Laurent, Nicolas
Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography
title Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography
title_full Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography
title_fullStr Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography
title_full_unstemmed Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography
title_short Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography
title_sort impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35763243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12282-022-01375-9
work_keys_str_mv AT danglananh impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography
AT chazardemmanuel impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography
AT ponceletedouard impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography
AT serbteodora impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography
AT rusuaniela impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography
AT pauwelsxavier impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography
AT parsyclemence impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography
AT pocletthibault impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography
AT cauliezhugo impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography
AT engelaereconstance impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography
AT rametteguillaume impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography
AT briennecharlotte impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography
AT dujardinsofiane impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography
AT laurentnicolas impactofartificialintelligenceinbreastcancerscreeningwithmammography