Cargando…

A systematic review of the effects of e-cigarette use on lung function

Given the increasing use of e-cigarettes and uncertainty surrounding their safety, we conducted a systematic review to determine the effects of e-cigarettes on measures of lung function. We systematically searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO databases via Ovid, the Cochrane CENTRAL database, and t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Honeycutt, Lucy, Huerne, Katherine, Miller, Alanna, Wennberg, Erica, Filion, Kristian B., Grad, Roland, Gershon, Andrea S., Ells, Carolyn, Gore, Genevieve, Benedetti, Andrea, Thombs, Brett, Eisenberg, Mark J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9588082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36273009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41533-022-00311-w
_version_ 1784814050031435776
author Honeycutt, Lucy
Huerne, Katherine
Miller, Alanna
Wennberg, Erica
Filion, Kristian B.
Grad, Roland
Gershon, Andrea S.
Ells, Carolyn
Gore, Genevieve
Benedetti, Andrea
Thombs, Brett
Eisenberg, Mark J.
author_facet Honeycutt, Lucy
Huerne, Katherine
Miller, Alanna
Wennberg, Erica
Filion, Kristian B.
Grad, Roland
Gershon, Andrea S.
Ells, Carolyn
Gore, Genevieve
Benedetti, Andrea
Thombs, Brett
Eisenberg, Mark J.
author_sort Honeycutt, Lucy
collection PubMed
description Given the increasing use of e-cigarettes and uncertainty surrounding their safety, we conducted a systematic review to determine the effects of e-cigarettes on measures of lung function. We systematically searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO databases via Ovid, the Cochrane CENTRAL database, and the Web of Science Core from 2004 until July 2021, identifying 8856 potentially eligible studies. A total of eight studies (seven studying immediate effects and one long-term effects, 273 total participants) were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies—of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and Cochrane risk of bias tools. These studies suggest that vaping increases airway resistance but does not appear to impact forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)), forced vital capacity (FVC), or FEV(1)/FVC ratio. However, given the limited size and follow-up duration of these studies, larger, long-term studies are required to further determine the effects of e-cigarettes on lung function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9588082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95880822022-10-24 A systematic review of the effects of e-cigarette use on lung function Honeycutt, Lucy Huerne, Katherine Miller, Alanna Wennberg, Erica Filion, Kristian B. Grad, Roland Gershon, Andrea S. Ells, Carolyn Gore, Genevieve Benedetti, Andrea Thombs, Brett Eisenberg, Mark J. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Article Given the increasing use of e-cigarettes and uncertainty surrounding their safety, we conducted a systematic review to determine the effects of e-cigarettes on measures of lung function. We systematically searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO databases via Ovid, the Cochrane CENTRAL database, and the Web of Science Core from 2004 until July 2021, identifying 8856 potentially eligible studies. A total of eight studies (seven studying immediate effects and one long-term effects, 273 total participants) were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies—of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and Cochrane risk of bias tools. These studies suggest that vaping increases airway resistance but does not appear to impact forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)), forced vital capacity (FVC), or FEV(1)/FVC ratio. However, given the limited size and follow-up duration of these studies, larger, long-term studies are required to further determine the effects of e-cigarettes on lung function. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9588082/ /pubmed/36273009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41533-022-00311-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Honeycutt, Lucy
Huerne, Katherine
Miller, Alanna
Wennberg, Erica
Filion, Kristian B.
Grad, Roland
Gershon, Andrea S.
Ells, Carolyn
Gore, Genevieve
Benedetti, Andrea
Thombs, Brett
Eisenberg, Mark J.
A systematic review of the effects of e-cigarette use on lung function
title A systematic review of the effects of e-cigarette use on lung function
title_full A systematic review of the effects of e-cigarette use on lung function
title_fullStr A systematic review of the effects of e-cigarette use on lung function
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of the effects of e-cigarette use on lung function
title_short A systematic review of the effects of e-cigarette use on lung function
title_sort systematic review of the effects of e-cigarette use on lung function
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9588082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36273009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41533-022-00311-w
work_keys_str_mv AT honeycuttlucy asystematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT huernekatherine asystematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT milleralanna asystematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT wennbergerica asystematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT filionkristianb asystematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT gradroland asystematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT gershonandreas asystematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT ellscarolyn asystematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT goregenevieve asystematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT benedettiandrea asystematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT thombsbrett asystematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT eisenbergmarkj asystematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT honeycuttlucy systematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT huernekatherine systematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT milleralanna systematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT wennbergerica systematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT filionkristianb systematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT gradroland systematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT gershonandreas systematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT ellscarolyn systematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT goregenevieve systematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT benedettiandrea systematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT thombsbrett systematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction
AT eisenbergmarkj systematicreviewoftheeffectsofecigaretteuseonlungfunction