Cargando…
Patient and public involvement in an international rheumatology translational research project: an evaluation
BACKGROUND: Rheuma Tolerance for Cure (RTCure) is a five-year international collaboration between academia, industry and patients/members of the public. It focuses on developing approaches to predict the onset of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and designing clinical trials to reduce the risk of disease d...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9588249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36273206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-022-00311-w |
_version_ | 1784814087735083008 |
---|---|
author | de Souza, Savia Johansson, Eva C. Karlfeldt, Susanne Raza, Karim Williams, Ruth |
author_facet | de Souza, Savia Johansson, Eva C. Karlfeldt, Susanne Raza, Karim Williams, Ruth |
author_sort | de Souza, Savia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rheuma Tolerance for Cure (RTCure) is a five-year international collaboration between academia, industry and patients/members of the public. It focuses on developing approaches to predict the onset of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and designing clinical trials to reduce the risk of disease development through immune-tolerising and other treatments. We conducted a mid-term evaluation of patient and public involvement (PPI) within the project. METHODS: Two surveys on PPI were co-designed by the PPI Coordinator, Patient/Public Research Partners (PRPs) and a researcher. Both anonymous, electronic surveys were distributed to 61 researchers and 9 PRPs. Quantitative survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics and free text responses underwent inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Researcher and Patient response rates were 33% and 78%, respectively. Quantitative Researcher Survey data highlighted that (i) responding researchers represented all seven Work Packages (WPs), (ii) 40% thought PRPs had made a large or extremely large contribution to their own WPs, (iii) 55% thought PPI has had a moderate or large impact on RTCure, (iv) 75% worked with PRPs in RTCure, and (v) 60% said PRPs had affected their research thinking. Quantitative PRP Survey data highlighted that (i) PRPs were most involved in four WPs, (ii) 43% thought they had made a minor contribution to their main WP, (iii) 57% thought PPI has had a small impact on RTCure, and (iv) 57% thought they received too little feedback on the outcome of their contribution to different tasks. Four main themes were identified in both surveys: ‘PRP contributions’, ‘Experiences of PPI’, ‘Impact of PPI on RTCure’, and ‘How PPI can be improved’. Two additional themes from the Researcher Survey were ‘Impact of PPI on researchers’ and ‘Influence on Future Projects’, and from the PRP Survey were ‘Impact of PPI on PRPs’ and ‘Engagement with PRPs’. CONCLUSION: PPI seemed to have a significant impact on RTCure, however, PRPs were less aware. A focus on improving communication between PRPs and researchers (facilitated by the PPI Coordinator), and providing PPI training for researchers is likely to improve involvement. Complex legal agreements for PRPs should be avoided and careful attention paid to appropriate PRP compensation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-022-00311-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9588249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95882492022-10-24 Patient and public involvement in an international rheumatology translational research project: an evaluation de Souza, Savia Johansson, Eva C. Karlfeldt, Susanne Raza, Karim Williams, Ruth BMC Rheumatol Research Article BACKGROUND: Rheuma Tolerance for Cure (RTCure) is a five-year international collaboration between academia, industry and patients/members of the public. It focuses on developing approaches to predict the onset of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and designing clinical trials to reduce the risk of disease development through immune-tolerising and other treatments. We conducted a mid-term evaluation of patient and public involvement (PPI) within the project. METHODS: Two surveys on PPI were co-designed by the PPI Coordinator, Patient/Public Research Partners (PRPs) and a researcher. Both anonymous, electronic surveys were distributed to 61 researchers and 9 PRPs. Quantitative survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics and free text responses underwent inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Researcher and Patient response rates were 33% and 78%, respectively. Quantitative Researcher Survey data highlighted that (i) responding researchers represented all seven Work Packages (WPs), (ii) 40% thought PRPs had made a large or extremely large contribution to their own WPs, (iii) 55% thought PPI has had a moderate or large impact on RTCure, (iv) 75% worked with PRPs in RTCure, and (v) 60% said PRPs had affected their research thinking. Quantitative PRP Survey data highlighted that (i) PRPs were most involved in four WPs, (ii) 43% thought they had made a minor contribution to their main WP, (iii) 57% thought PPI has had a small impact on RTCure, and (iv) 57% thought they received too little feedback on the outcome of their contribution to different tasks. Four main themes were identified in both surveys: ‘PRP contributions’, ‘Experiences of PPI’, ‘Impact of PPI on RTCure’, and ‘How PPI can be improved’. Two additional themes from the Researcher Survey were ‘Impact of PPI on researchers’ and ‘Influence on Future Projects’, and from the PRP Survey were ‘Impact of PPI on PRPs’ and ‘Engagement with PRPs’. CONCLUSION: PPI seemed to have a significant impact on RTCure, however, PRPs were less aware. A focus on improving communication between PRPs and researchers (facilitated by the PPI Coordinator), and providing PPI training for researchers is likely to improve involvement. Complex legal agreements for PRPs should be avoided and careful attention paid to appropriate PRP compensation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-022-00311-w. BioMed Central 2022-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9588249/ /pubmed/36273206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-022-00311-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article de Souza, Savia Johansson, Eva C. Karlfeldt, Susanne Raza, Karim Williams, Ruth Patient and public involvement in an international rheumatology translational research project: an evaluation |
title | Patient and public involvement in an international rheumatology translational research project: an evaluation |
title_full | Patient and public involvement in an international rheumatology translational research project: an evaluation |
title_fullStr | Patient and public involvement in an international rheumatology translational research project: an evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient and public involvement in an international rheumatology translational research project: an evaluation |
title_short | Patient and public involvement in an international rheumatology translational research project: an evaluation |
title_sort | patient and public involvement in an international rheumatology translational research project: an evaluation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9588249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36273206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-022-00311-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT desouzasavia patientandpublicinvolvementinaninternationalrheumatologytranslationalresearchprojectanevaluation AT johanssonevac patientandpublicinvolvementinaninternationalrheumatologytranslationalresearchprojectanevaluation AT karlfeldtsusanne patientandpublicinvolvementinaninternationalrheumatologytranslationalresearchprojectanevaluation AT razakarim patientandpublicinvolvementinaninternationalrheumatologytranslationalresearchprojectanevaluation AT williamsruth patientandpublicinvolvementinaninternationalrheumatologytranslationalresearchprojectanevaluation |