Cargando…

Measurement of the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system using two distinct approaches

PURPOSE: To develop a methodology that can be used to measure the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system. METHODS: The gating system was composed of an automatic gating interface (Response) and an in‐house respiratory motion monitoring system featuring an optically tracked surface marker. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stock, Michael G., Chu, Connel, Fontenot, Jonas D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9588262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36082988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13768
_version_ 1784814091144003584
author Stock, Michael G.
Chu, Connel
Fontenot, Jonas D.
author_facet Stock, Michael G.
Chu, Connel
Fontenot, Jonas D.
author_sort Stock, Michael G.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To develop a methodology that can be used to measure the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system. METHODS: The gating system was composed of an automatic gating interface (Response) and an in‐house respiratory motion monitoring system featuring an optically tracked surface marker. Two approaches were used to measure gating latencies. A modular approach involved measuring separately the latency of the gating system's complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor tracking camera, tracking software, and a gating latency of the LINAC. Additionally, an end‐to‐end approach was used to measure the total latency of the gating system. End‐to‐end latencies were measured using the displacement of a radiographic target moving at known velocities during the gating process. RESULTS: Summing together the latencies of each of the modular components investigated yielded a total beam‐on latency of 1.55 s and a total beam‐off latency of 0.49 s. End‐to‐end beam‐on and beam‐off latency was found to be 1.49 and 0.34 s, respectively. In each case, no statistically significant differences were found between the end‐to‐end latency of the gating system and the summation of the individually measured components. CONCLUSION: Two distinct approaches to quantify gating latencies were presented. Measuring the end‐to‐end latency of the gating system provided an independent means of validating the modular approach. It is expected that the beam‐on latencies reported in this work could be reduced by altering the control system configuration of the LINAC. The modular approach can be used to decouple the individual latencies of the gating system, but future improvements in the temporal resolution of the service graphing feature are needed to reduce the uncertainty of LINAC‐related gating latencies measured using this approach. Both approaches are generalizable and can be used together when designing a quality assurance program for a respiratory gating system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9588262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95882622022-10-25 Measurement of the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system using two distinct approaches Stock, Michael G. Chu, Connel Fontenot, Jonas D. J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes PURPOSE: To develop a methodology that can be used to measure the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system. METHODS: The gating system was composed of an automatic gating interface (Response) and an in‐house respiratory motion monitoring system featuring an optically tracked surface marker. Two approaches were used to measure gating latencies. A modular approach involved measuring separately the latency of the gating system's complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor tracking camera, tracking software, and a gating latency of the LINAC. Additionally, an end‐to‐end approach was used to measure the total latency of the gating system. End‐to‐end latencies were measured using the displacement of a radiographic target moving at known velocities during the gating process. RESULTS: Summing together the latencies of each of the modular components investigated yielded a total beam‐on latency of 1.55 s and a total beam‐off latency of 0.49 s. End‐to‐end beam‐on and beam‐off latency was found to be 1.49 and 0.34 s, respectively. In each case, no statistically significant differences were found between the end‐to‐end latency of the gating system and the summation of the individually measured components. CONCLUSION: Two distinct approaches to quantify gating latencies were presented. Measuring the end‐to‐end latency of the gating system provided an independent means of validating the modular approach. It is expected that the beam‐on latencies reported in this work could be reduced by altering the control system configuration of the LINAC. The modular approach can be used to decouple the individual latencies of the gating system, but future improvements in the temporal resolution of the service graphing feature are needed to reduce the uncertainty of LINAC‐related gating latencies measured using this approach. Both approaches are generalizable and can be used together when designing a quality assurance program for a respiratory gating system. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9588262/ /pubmed/36082988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13768 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Stock, Michael G.
Chu, Connel
Fontenot, Jonas D.
Measurement of the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system using two distinct approaches
title Measurement of the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system using two distinct approaches
title_full Measurement of the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system using two distinct approaches
title_fullStr Measurement of the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system using two distinct approaches
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system using two distinct approaches
title_short Measurement of the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system using two distinct approaches
title_sort measurement of the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system using two distinct approaches
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9588262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36082988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13768
work_keys_str_mv AT stockmichaelg measurementofthetemporallatencyofarespiratorygatingsystemusingtwodistinctapproaches
AT chuconnel measurementofthetemporallatencyofarespiratorygatingsystemusingtwodistinctapproaches
AT fontenotjonasd measurementofthetemporallatencyofarespiratorygatingsystemusingtwodistinctapproaches