Cargando…
Measurement of the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system using two distinct approaches
PURPOSE: To develop a methodology that can be used to measure the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system. METHODS: The gating system was composed of an automatic gating interface (Response) and an in‐house respiratory motion monitoring system featuring an optically tracked surface marker. T...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9588262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36082988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13768 |
_version_ | 1784814091144003584 |
---|---|
author | Stock, Michael G. Chu, Connel Fontenot, Jonas D. |
author_facet | Stock, Michael G. Chu, Connel Fontenot, Jonas D. |
author_sort | Stock, Michael G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To develop a methodology that can be used to measure the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system. METHODS: The gating system was composed of an automatic gating interface (Response) and an in‐house respiratory motion monitoring system featuring an optically tracked surface marker. Two approaches were used to measure gating latencies. A modular approach involved measuring separately the latency of the gating system's complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor tracking camera, tracking software, and a gating latency of the LINAC. Additionally, an end‐to‐end approach was used to measure the total latency of the gating system. End‐to‐end latencies were measured using the displacement of a radiographic target moving at known velocities during the gating process. RESULTS: Summing together the latencies of each of the modular components investigated yielded a total beam‐on latency of 1.55 s and a total beam‐off latency of 0.49 s. End‐to‐end beam‐on and beam‐off latency was found to be 1.49 and 0.34 s, respectively. In each case, no statistically significant differences were found between the end‐to‐end latency of the gating system and the summation of the individually measured components. CONCLUSION: Two distinct approaches to quantify gating latencies were presented. Measuring the end‐to‐end latency of the gating system provided an independent means of validating the modular approach. It is expected that the beam‐on latencies reported in this work could be reduced by altering the control system configuration of the LINAC. The modular approach can be used to decouple the individual latencies of the gating system, but future improvements in the temporal resolution of the service graphing feature are needed to reduce the uncertainty of LINAC‐related gating latencies measured using this approach. Both approaches are generalizable and can be used together when designing a quality assurance program for a respiratory gating system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9588262 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95882622022-10-25 Measurement of the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system using two distinct approaches Stock, Michael G. Chu, Connel Fontenot, Jonas D. J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes PURPOSE: To develop a methodology that can be used to measure the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system. METHODS: The gating system was composed of an automatic gating interface (Response) and an in‐house respiratory motion monitoring system featuring an optically tracked surface marker. Two approaches were used to measure gating latencies. A modular approach involved measuring separately the latency of the gating system's complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor tracking camera, tracking software, and a gating latency of the LINAC. Additionally, an end‐to‐end approach was used to measure the total latency of the gating system. End‐to‐end latencies were measured using the displacement of a radiographic target moving at known velocities during the gating process. RESULTS: Summing together the latencies of each of the modular components investigated yielded a total beam‐on latency of 1.55 s and a total beam‐off latency of 0.49 s. End‐to‐end beam‐on and beam‐off latency was found to be 1.49 and 0.34 s, respectively. In each case, no statistically significant differences were found between the end‐to‐end latency of the gating system and the summation of the individually measured components. CONCLUSION: Two distinct approaches to quantify gating latencies were presented. Measuring the end‐to‐end latency of the gating system provided an independent means of validating the modular approach. It is expected that the beam‐on latencies reported in this work could be reduced by altering the control system configuration of the LINAC. The modular approach can be used to decouple the individual latencies of the gating system, but future improvements in the temporal resolution of the service graphing feature are needed to reduce the uncertainty of LINAC‐related gating latencies measured using this approach. Both approaches are generalizable and can be used together when designing a quality assurance program for a respiratory gating system. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9588262/ /pubmed/36082988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13768 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Notes Stock, Michael G. Chu, Connel Fontenot, Jonas D. Measurement of the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system using two distinct approaches |
title | Measurement of the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system using two distinct approaches |
title_full | Measurement of the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system using two distinct approaches |
title_fullStr | Measurement of the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system using two distinct approaches |
title_full_unstemmed | Measurement of the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system using two distinct approaches |
title_short | Measurement of the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system using two distinct approaches |
title_sort | measurement of the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system using two distinct approaches |
topic | Technical Notes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9588262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36082988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13768 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stockmichaelg measurementofthetemporallatencyofarespiratorygatingsystemusingtwodistinctapproaches AT chuconnel measurementofthetemporallatencyofarespiratorygatingsystemusingtwodistinctapproaches AT fontenotjonasd measurementofthetemporallatencyofarespiratorygatingsystemusingtwodistinctapproaches |