Cargando…

Development of a vendor neutral MRI distortion quality assurance workflow

With the utilization of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in radiotherapy increasing, routine quality assurance (QA) of these systems is necessary. The assessment of geometric distortion in images used for radiotherapy treatment planning needs to be quantified and monitored over time. This work presen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker, Amy, Chlap, Phillip, Causer, Trent, Mahmood, Faisal, Buckley, Jarryd, Holloway, Lois
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9588272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35880651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13735
_version_ 1784814093609205760
author Walker, Amy
Chlap, Phillip
Causer, Trent
Mahmood, Faisal
Buckley, Jarryd
Holloway, Lois
author_facet Walker, Amy
Chlap, Phillip
Causer, Trent
Mahmood, Faisal
Buckley, Jarryd
Holloway, Lois
author_sort Walker, Amy
collection PubMed
description With the utilization of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in radiotherapy increasing, routine quality assurance (QA) of these systems is necessary. The assessment of geometric distortion in images used for radiotherapy treatment planning needs to be quantified and monitored over time. This work presents an adaptable methodology for performing routine QA for systematic MRI geometric distortion. A software tool and compatible protocol (designed to work with any CT and MR compatible phantom on any scanner) were developed to quantify geometric distortion via deformable image registration. The MR image is deformed to the CT, generating a deformation field, which is sampled, quantifying geometric distortion as a function of distance from scanner isocenter. Configurability of the QA tool was tested, and results compared to those provided from commercial solutions. Registration accuracy was investigated by repeating the deformable registration step on the initial deformed MR image to define regions with residual distortions. The geometric distortion of four clinical systems was quantified using the customisable QA method presented. Maximum measured distortions varied from 2.2 to 19.4 mm (image parameter and sampling volume dependent). The workflow was successfully customized for different phantom configurations and volunteer imaging studies. Comparison to a vendor supplied solution showed good agreement in regions where the two procedures were sampling the same imaging volume. On a large field of view phantom across various scanners, the QA tool accurately quantified geometric distortions within 17–22 cm from scanner isocenter. Beyond these regions, the geometric integrity of images in clinical applications should be considered with a higher degree of uncertainty due to increased gradient nonlinearity and B(0) inhomogeneity. This tool has been successfully integrated into routine QA of the MRI scanner utilized for radiotherapy within our department. It enables any low susceptibility MR‐CT compatible phantom to quantify the geometric distortion on any MRI scanner with a configurable, user friendly interface for ease of use and consistency in data collection and analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9588272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95882722022-10-25 Development of a vendor neutral MRI distortion quality assurance workflow Walker, Amy Chlap, Phillip Causer, Trent Mahmood, Faisal Buckley, Jarryd Holloway, Lois J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging With the utilization of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in radiotherapy increasing, routine quality assurance (QA) of these systems is necessary. The assessment of geometric distortion in images used for radiotherapy treatment planning needs to be quantified and monitored over time. This work presents an adaptable methodology for performing routine QA for systematic MRI geometric distortion. A software tool and compatible protocol (designed to work with any CT and MR compatible phantom on any scanner) were developed to quantify geometric distortion via deformable image registration. The MR image is deformed to the CT, generating a deformation field, which is sampled, quantifying geometric distortion as a function of distance from scanner isocenter. Configurability of the QA tool was tested, and results compared to those provided from commercial solutions. Registration accuracy was investigated by repeating the deformable registration step on the initial deformed MR image to define regions with residual distortions. The geometric distortion of four clinical systems was quantified using the customisable QA method presented. Maximum measured distortions varied from 2.2 to 19.4 mm (image parameter and sampling volume dependent). The workflow was successfully customized for different phantom configurations and volunteer imaging studies. Comparison to a vendor supplied solution showed good agreement in regions where the two procedures were sampling the same imaging volume. On a large field of view phantom across various scanners, the QA tool accurately quantified geometric distortions within 17–22 cm from scanner isocenter. Beyond these regions, the geometric integrity of images in clinical applications should be considered with a higher degree of uncertainty due to increased gradient nonlinearity and B(0) inhomogeneity. This tool has been successfully integrated into routine QA of the MRI scanner utilized for radiotherapy within our department. It enables any low susceptibility MR‐CT compatible phantom to quantify the geometric distortion on any MRI scanner with a configurable, user friendly interface for ease of use and consistency in data collection and analysis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9588272/ /pubmed/35880651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13735 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Walker, Amy
Chlap, Phillip
Causer, Trent
Mahmood, Faisal
Buckley, Jarryd
Holloway, Lois
Development of a vendor neutral MRI distortion quality assurance workflow
title Development of a vendor neutral MRI distortion quality assurance workflow
title_full Development of a vendor neutral MRI distortion quality assurance workflow
title_fullStr Development of a vendor neutral MRI distortion quality assurance workflow
title_full_unstemmed Development of a vendor neutral MRI distortion quality assurance workflow
title_short Development of a vendor neutral MRI distortion quality assurance workflow
title_sort development of a vendor neutral mri distortion quality assurance workflow
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9588272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35880651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13735
work_keys_str_mv AT walkeramy developmentofavendorneutralmridistortionqualityassuranceworkflow
AT chlapphillip developmentofavendorneutralmridistortionqualityassuranceworkflow
AT causertrent developmentofavendorneutralmridistortionqualityassuranceworkflow
AT mahmoodfaisal developmentofavendorneutralmridistortionqualityassuranceworkflow
AT buckleyjarryd developmentofavendorneutralmridistortionqualityassuranceworkflow
AT hollowaylois developmentofavendorneutralmridistortionqualityassuranceworkflow