Cargando…

Assessment of using a gamma index analysis for patient‐specific quality assurance in Japan

PURPOSE: The Task Group 218 (TG‐218) report was published by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine in 2018, recommending the appropriate use of gamma index analysis for patient‐specific quality assurance (PSQA). The paper demonstrates that PSQA for radiotherapy in Japan appropriately ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anetai, Yusuke, Sumida, Iori, Kumazaki, Yu, Kito, Satoshi, Kurooka, Masahiko, Ueda, Yoshihiro, Otani, Yuki, Narita, Yuichiro, Kawamorita, Ryu, Akita, Kazuhiko, Kato, Takahiro, Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9588274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36018627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13745
_version_ 1784814094114619392
author Anetai, Yusuke
Sumida, Iori
Kumazaki, Yu
Kito, Satoshi
Kurooka, Masahiko
Ueda, Yoshihiro
Otani, Yuki
Narita, Yuichiro
Kawamorita, Ryu
Akita, Kazuhiko
Kato, Takahiro
Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
author_facet Anetai, Yusuke
Sumida, Iori
Kumazaki, Yu
Kito, Satoshi
Kurooka, Masahiko
Ueda, Yoshihiro
Otani, Yuki
Narita, Yuichiro
Kawamorita, Ryu
Akita, Kazuhiko
Kato, Takahiro
Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
author_sort Anetai, Yusuke
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The Task Group 218 (TG‐218) report was published by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine in 2018, recommending the appropriate use of gamma index analysis for patient‐specific quality assurance (PSQA). The paper demonstrates that PSQA for radiotherapy in Japan appropriately applies the gamma index analysis considering TG‐218. MATERIALS/METHODS: This survey estimated the acceptance state of radiotherapeutic institutes or facilities in Japan for the guideline using a web‐based questionnaire. To investigate an appropriate PSQA of the facility‐specific conditions, we researched an optimal tolerance or action level for various clinical situations, including different treatment machines, clinical policies, measurement devices, staff or their skills, and patient conditions. The responded data were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) and multidimensional scaling (MDS). The PCA focused on factor loading values of the first contribution over 0.5, whereas the MDS focused on mapped distances among data. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 148 facilities that use intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), which accounted for 42.8% of the probable IMRT use in Japan. This survey revealed the appropriate application of the following universal criteria for gamma index analysis from the guideline recommendation despite the facility‐specific variations (treatment machines/the number of IMRT cases/facility attributes/responded [representative] expertise or staff): (a) 95% pass rate, (b) 3% dose difference and 2‐mm distance‐to‐agreement, and (c) 10% threshold dose. Conditions (a)–(c) were the principal components of the data by the PCA method and were mapped in a similar distance range, which was easily clustered from other gamma index analytic factors by the MDS method. Conditions (a)–(c) were the universally essential factors for the PSQA in Japan. CONCLUSION: We found that the majority of facilities using IMRT in each region of Japan complied with the guideline and conducted PSQA with deliberation under the individual facility‐specific conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9588274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95882742022-10-25 Assessment of using a gamma index analysis for patient‐specific quality assurance in Japan Anetai, Yusuke Sumida, Iori Kumazaki, Yu Kito, Satoshi Kurooka, Masahiko Ueda, Yoshihiro Otani, Yuki Narita, Yuichiro Kawamorita, Ryu Akita, Kazuhiko Kato, Takahiro Nakamura, Mitsuhiro J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: The Task Group 218 (TG‐218) report was published by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine in 2018, recommending the appropriate use of gamma index analysis for patient‐specific quality assurance (PSQA). The paper demonstrates that PSQA for radiotherapy in Japan appropriately applies the gamma index analysis considering TG‐218. MATERIALS/METHODS: This survey estimated the acceptance state of radiotherapeutic institutes or facilities in Japan for the guideline using a web‐based questionnaire. To investigate an appropriate PSQA of the facility‐specific conditions, we researched an optimal tolerance or action level for various clinical situations, including different treatment machines, clinical policies, measurement devices, staff or their skills, and patient conditions. The responded data were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) and multidimensional scaling (MDS). The PCA focused on factor loading values of the first contribution over 0.5, whereas the MDS focused on mapped distances among data. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 148 facilities that use intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), which accounted for 42.8% of the probable IMRT use in Japan. This survey revealed the appropriate application of the following universal criteria for gamma index analysis from the guideline recommendation despite the facility‐specific variations (treatment machines/the number of IMRT cases/facility attributes/responded [representative] expertise or staff): (a) 95% pass rate, (b) 3% dose difference and 2‐mm distance‐to‐agreement, and (c) 10% threshold dose. Conditions (a)–(c) were the principal components of the data by the PCA method and were mapped in a similar distance range, which was easily clustered from other gamma index analytic factors by the MDS method. Conditions (a)–(c) were the universally essential factors for the PSQA in Japan. CONCLUSION: We found that the majority of facilities using IMRT in each region of Japan complied with the guideline and conducted PSQA with deliberation under the individual facility‐specific conditions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9588274/ /pubmed/36018627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13745 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Anetai, Yusuke
Sumida, Iori
Kumazaki, Yu
Kito, Satoshi
Kurooka, Masahiko
Ueda, Yoshihiro
Otani, Yuki
Narita, Yuichiro
Kawamorita, Ryu
Akita, Kazuhiko
Kato, Takahiro
Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
Assessment of using a gamma index analysis for patient‐specific quality assurance in Japan
title Assessment of using a gamma index analysis for patient‐specific quality assurance in Japan
title_full Assessment of using a gamma index analysis for patient‐specific quality assurance in Japan
title_fullStr Assessment of using a gamma index analysis for patient‐specific quality assurance in Japan
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of using a gamma index analysis for patient‐specific quality assurance in Japan
title_short Assessment of using a gamma index analysis for patient‐specific quality assurance in Japan
title_sort assessment of using a gamma index analysis for patient‐specific quality assurance in japan
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9588274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36018627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13745
work_keys_str_mv AT anetaiyusuke assessmentofusingagammaindexanalysisforpatientspecificqualityassuranceinjapan
AT sumidaiori assessmentofusingagammaindexanalysisforpatientspecificqualityassuranceinjapan
AT kumazakiyu assessmentofusingagammaindexanalysisforpatientspecificqualityassuranceinjapan
AT kitosatoshi assessmentofusingagammaindexanalysisforpatientspecificqualityassuranceinjapan
AT kurookamasahiko assessmentofusingagammaindexanalysisforpatientspecificqualityassuranceinjapan
AT uedayoshihiro assessmentofusingagammaindexanalysisforpatientspecificqualityassuranceinjapan
AT otaniyuki assessmentofusingagammaindexanalysisforpatientspecificqualityassuranceinjapan
AT naritayuichiro assessmentofusingagammaindexanalysisforpatientspecificqualityassuranceinjapan
AT kawamoritaryu assessmentofusingagammaindexanalysisforpatientspecificqualityassuranceinjapan
AT akitakazuhiko assessmentofusingagammaindexanalysisforpatientspecificqualityassuranceinjapan
AT katotakahiro assessmentofusingagammaindexanalysisforpatientspecificqualityassuranceinjapan
AT nakamuramitsuhiro assessmentofusingagammaindexanalysisforpatientspecificqualityassuranceinjapan