Cargando…

Assessment of the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence in the reimbursement decisions of new cancer drugs

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to describe the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence supporting reimbursement decisions of new cancer drugs and analyze the influence of trial characteristics and the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) on the likelihood of reimbursement in Sweden. PATIENTS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chauca Strand, G., Bonander, C., Jakobsson, N., Johansson, N., Svensson, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9588887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36037568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100569
_version_ 1784814172997943296
author Chauca Strand, G.
Bonander, C.
Jakobsson, N.
Johansson, N.
Svensson, M.
author_facet Chauca Strand, G.
Bonander, C.
Jakobsson, N.
Johansson, N.
Svensson, M.
author_sort Chauca Strand, G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to describe the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence supporting reimbursement decisions of new cancer drugs and analyze the influence of trial characteristics and the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) on the likelihood of reimbursement in Sweden. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were extracted from all appraisal dossiers for new cancer drugs seeking reimbursement in Sweden and claiming added therapeutical value between the years 2010 and 2020. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and logistic regression models were also used with the cost per QALY, study design, comparator, and evidence on final outcomes in the clinical trials as predictors of reimbursement. RESULTS: All 60 included appraisals were based on trial evidence that assessed at least one final outcome (overall survival [OS] or quality of life [QoL]), although rarely as a primary outcome. Of the appraisals with a final decision (n = 58), 79% were approved for reimbursement. Among the reimbursed drugs, only half had trial evidence demonstrating improved OS or QoL. Only one drug had trial evidence supporting improvements in both OS and QoL. The average cost per QALY for reimbursed cancer drugs was estimated to be 748 560 SEK (€73 583). A higher cost per QALY was found to decrease the likelihood of reimbursement by 9.4% for every 100 000 SEK (€9830) higher cost per QALY (P = 0.03). For cost-effectiveness models without direct evidence of improvements in final outcomes, a larger QALY gain was observed compared with those with evidence mainly relying on intermediate and surrogate outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There are substantial uncertainties in the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence underlying reimbursement decisions of new cancer drugs. Decision makers should be cautious of the limited evidence on patient-centered outcomes and the implications of allocating resources to expensive treatments with uncertain value for money.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9588887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95888872022-10-25 Assessment of the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence in the reimbursement decisions of new cancer drugs Chauca Strand, G. Bonander, C. Jakobsson, N. Johansson, N. Svensson, M. ESMO Open Original Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to describe the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence supporting reimbursement decisions of new cancer drugs and analyze the influence of trial characteristics and the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) on the likelihood of reimbursement in Sweden. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were extracted from all appraisal dossiers for new cancer drugs seeking reimbursement in Sweden and claiming added therapeutical value between the years 2010 and 2020. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and logistic regression models were also used with the cost per QALY, study design, comparator, and evidence on final outcomes in the clinical trials as predictors of reimbursement. RESULTS: All 60 included appraisals were based on trial evidence that assessed at least one final outcome (overall survival [OS] or quality of life [QoL]), although rarely as a primary outcome. Of the appraisals with a final decision (n = 58), 79% were approved for reimbursement. Among the reimbursed drugs, only half had trial evidence demonstrating improved OS or QoL. Only one drug had trial evidence supporting improvements in both OS and QoL. The average cost per QALY for reimbursed cancer drugs was estimated to be 748 560 SEK (€73 583). A higher cost per QALY was found to decrease the likelihood of reimbursement by 9.4% for every 100 000 SEK (€9830) higher cost per QALY (P = 0.03). For cost-effectiveness models without direct evidence of improvements in final outcomes, a larger QALY gain was observed compared with those with evidence mainly relying on intermediate and surrogate outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There are substantial uncertainties in the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence underlying reimbursement decisions of new cancer drugs. Decision makers should be cautious of the limited evidence on patient-centered outcomes and the implications of allocating resources to expensive treatments with uncertain value for money. Elsevier 2022-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9588887/ /pubmed/36037568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100569 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Chauca Strand, G.
Bonander, C.
Jakobsson, N.
Johansson, N.
Svensson, M.
Assessment of the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence in the reimbursement decisions of new cancer drugs
title Assessment of the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence in the reimbursement decisions of new cancer drugs
title_full Assessment of the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence in the reimbursement decisions of new cancer drugs
title_fullStr Assessment of the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence in the reimbursement decisions of new cancer drugs
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence in the reimbursement decisions of new cancer drugs
title_short Assessment of the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence in the reimbursement decisions of new cancer drugs
title_sort assessment of the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence in the reimbursement decisions of new cancer drugs
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9588887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36037568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100569
work_keys_str_mv AT chaucastrandg assessmentoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessevidenceinthereimbursementdecisionsofnewcancerdrugs
AT bonanderc assessmentoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessevidenceinthereimbursementdecisionsofnewcancerdrugs
AT jakobssonn assessmentoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessevidenceinthereimbursementdecisionsofnewcancerdrugs
AT johanssonn assessmentoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessevidenceinthereimbursementdecisionsofnewcancerdrugs
AT svenssonm assessmentoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessevidenceinthereimbursementdecisionsofnewcancerdrugs