Cargando…

Automated Brain Metastases Segmentation With a Deep Dive Into False-positive Detection

PURPOSE: The clinical management of brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is difficult, because a physician must review follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to determine treatment outcome, which is often labor intensive. The purpose of this study was to develop an automa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ziyaee, Hamidreza, Cardenas, Carlos E., Yeboa, D. Nana, Li, Jing, Ferguson, Sherise D., Johnson, Jason, Zhou, Zijian, Sanders, Jeremiah, Mumme, Raymond, Court, Laurence, Briere, Tina, Yang, Jinzhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9589017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36299565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101085
_version_ 1784814205271015424
author Ziyaee, Hamidreza
Cardenas, Carlos E.
Yeboa, D. Nana
Li, Jing
Ferguson, Sherise D.
Johnson, Jason
Zhou, Zijian
Sanders, Jeremiah
Mumme, Raymond
Court, Laurence
Briere, Tina
Yang, Jinzhong
author_facet Ziyaee, Hamidreza
Cardenas, Carlos E.
Yeboa, D. Nana
Li, Jing
Ferguson, Sherise D.
Johnson, Jason
Zhou, Zijian
Sanders, Jeremiah
Mumme, Raymond
Court, Laurence
Briere, Tina
Yang, Jinzhong
author_sort Ziyaee, Hamidreza
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The clinical management of brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is difficult, because a physician must review follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to determine treatment outcome, which is often labor intensive. The purpose of this study was to develop an automated framework to contour brain metastases in MRI to help treatment planning for SRS and understand its limitations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two self-adaptive nnU-Net models trained on postcontrast 3-dimensional T1-weighted MRI scans from patients who underwent SRS were analyzed. Performance was evaluated by computing positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The training and testing sets included 3482 metastases on 845 patient MRI scans and 930 metastases on 206 patient MRI scans, respectively. RESULTS: In the per-patient analysis, PPV was 90.1% ± 17.7%, sensitivity 88.4% ± 18.0%, DSC 82.2% ± 9.5%, and false positive (FP) 0.4 ± 1.0. For large metastases (≥6 mm), the per-patient PPV was 95.6% ± 17.5%, sensitivity 94.5% ± 18.1%, DSC 86.8% ± 7.5%, and FP 0.1 ± 0.4. The quality of autosegmented true-positive (TP) contours was also assessed by 2 physicians using a 5-point scale for clinical acceptability. Seventy-five percent of contours were assigned scores of 4 or 5, which shows that contours could be used as-is in clinical application, and the remaining 25% were assigned a score of 3, which means they needed minor editing only. Notably, a deep dive into FPs indicated that 9% were TP metastases not identified on the original radiology review, but identified on subsequent follow-up imaging (early detection). Fifty-four percent were real metastases (TP) that were identified but purposefully not contoured for target treatment, mainly because the patient underwent whole-brain radiation therapy before/after SRS treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that our tool can help radiologists and radiation oncologists detect and contour tumors from MRI, make precise decisions about suspicious lesions, and potentially find lesions at early stages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9589017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95890172022-10-25 Automated Brain Metastases Segmentation With a Deep Dive Into False-positive Detection Ziyaee, Hamidreza Cardenas, Carlos E. Yeboa, D. Nana Li, Jing Ferguson, Sherise D. Johnson, Jason Zhou, Zijian Sanders, Jeremiah Mumme, Raymond Court, Laurence Briere, Tina Yang, Jinzhong Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: The clinical management of brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is difficult, because a physician must review follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to determine treatment outcome, which is often labor intensive. The purpose of this study was to develop an automated framework to contour brain metastases in MRI to help treatment planning for SRS and understand its limitations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two self-adaptive nnU-Net models trained on postcontrast 3-dimensional T1-weighted MRI scans from patients who underwent SRS were analyzed. Performance was evaluated by computing positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The training and testing sets included 3482 metastases on 845 patient MRI scans and 930 metastases on 206 patient MRI scans, respectively. RESULTS: In the per-patient analysis, PPV was 90.1% ± 17.7%, sensitivity 88.4% ± 18.0%, DSC 82.2% ± 9.5%, and false positive (FP) 0.4 ± 1.0. For large metastases (≥6 mm), the per-patient PPV was 95.6% ± 17.5%, sensitivity 94.5% ± 18.1%, DSC 86.8% ± 7.5%, and FP 0.1 ± 0.4. The quality of autosegmented true-positive (TP) contours was also assessed by 2 physicians using a 5-point scale for clinical acceptability. Seventy-five percent of contours were assigned scores of 4 or 5, which shows that contours could be used as-is in clinical application, and the remaining 25% were assigned a score of 3, which means they needed minor editing only. Notably, a deep dive into FPs indicated that 9% were TP metastases not identified on the original radiology review, but identified on subsequent follow-up imaging (early detection). Fifty-four percent were real metastases (TP) that were identified but purposefully not contoured for target treatment, mainly because the patient underwent whole-brain radiation therapy before/after SRS treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that our tool can help radiologists and radiation oncologists detect and contour tumors from MRI, make precise decisions about suspicious lesions, and potentially find lesions at early stages. Elsevier 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9589017/ /pubmed/36299565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101085 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Ziyaee, Hamidreza
Cardenas, Carlos E.
Yeboa, D. Nana
Li, Jing
Ferguson, Sherise D.
Johnson, Jason
Zhou, Zijian
Sanders, Jeremiah
Mumme, Raymond
Court, Laurence
Briere, Tina
Yang, Jinzhong
Automated Brain Metastases Segmentation With a Deep Dive Into False-positive Detection
title Automated Brain Metastases Segmentation With a Deep Dive Into False-positive Detection
title_full Automated Brain Metastases Segmentation With a Deep Dive Into False-positive Detection
title_fullStr Automated Brain Metastases Segmentation With a Deep Dive Into False-positive Detection
title_full_unstemmed Automated Brain Metastases Segmentation With a Deep Dive Into False-positive Detection
title_short Automated Brain Metastases Segmentation With a Deep Dive Into False-positive Detection
title_sort automated brain metastases segmentation with a deep dive into false-positive detection
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9589017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36299565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101085
work_keys_str_mv AT ziyaeehamidreza automatedbrainmetastasessegmentationwithadeepdiveintofalsepositivedetection
AT cardenascarlose automatedbrainmetastasessegmentationwithadeepdiveintofalsepositivedetection
AT yeboadnana automatedbrainmetastasessegmentationwithadeepdiveintofalsepositivedetection
AT lijing automatedbrainmetastasessegmentationwithadeepdiveintofalsepositivedetection
AT fergusonsherised automatedbrainmetastasessegmentationwithadeepdiveintofalsepositivedetection
AT johnsonjason automatedbrainmetastasessegmentationwithadeepdiveintofalsepositivedetection
AT zhouzijian automatedbrainmetastasessegmentationwithadeepdiveintofalsepositivedetection
AT sandersjeremiah automatedbrainmetastasessegmentationwithadeepdiveintofalsepositivedetection
AT mummeraymond automatedbrainmetastasessegmentationwithadeepdiveintofalsepositivedetection
AT courtlaurence automatedbrainmetastasessegmentationwithadeepdiveintofalsepositivedetection
AT brieretina automatedbrainmetastasessegmentationwithadeepdiveintofalsepositivedetection
AT yangjinzhong automatedbrainmetastasessegmentationwithadeepdiveintofalsepositivedetection