Cargando…

Scoping review of rehabilitation care models for post COVID-19 condition

OBJECTIVE: To systematically map the current evidence about the characteristics of health systems, providers and patients to design rehabilitation care for post coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) condition. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review by searching the databases: MEDLINE®, Embase®, Web of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Décary, Simon, De Groote, Wouter, Arienti, Chiara, Kiekens, Carlotte, Boldrini, Paolo, Lazzarini, Stefano Giuseppe, Dugas, Michèle, Stefan, Théo, Langlois, Léa, Daigle, Frédérique, Naye, Florian, LeBlanc, Annie, Negrini, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: World Health Organization 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9589389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36324552
http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.22.288105
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To systematically map the current evidence about the characteristics of health systems, providers and patients to design rehabilitation care for post coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) condition. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review by searching the databases: MEDLINE®, Embase®, Web of Science, Cochrane COVID-19 Registry and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from inception to 22 April 2022. The search strategy included terms related to (i) post COVID-19 condition and other currently known terminologies; (ii) care models and pathways; and (iii) rehabilitation. We applied no language or study design restrictions. Two pairs of researchers independently screened title, abstracts and full-text articles and extracted data. We charted the evidence according to five topics: (i) care model components and functions; (ii) safe delivery of rehabilitation; (iii) referral principles; (iv) service delivery settings; and (v) health-care professionals. FINDINGS: We screened 13 753 titles and abstracts, read 154 full-text articles, and included 37 articles. The current evidence is conceptual and expert based. Care model components included multidisciplinary teams, continuity or coordination of care, people-centred care and shared decision-making between clinicians and patients. Care model functions included standardized symptoms assessment, telehealth and virtual care and follow-up system. Rehabilitation services were integrated at all levels of a health system from primary care to tertiary hospital-based care. Health-care workers delivering services within a multidisciplinary team included mostly physiotherapists, occupational therapists and psychologists. CONCLUSION: Key policy messages include implementing a multilevel and multiprofessional model; leveraging country health systems’ strengths and learning from other conditions; financing rehabilitation research providing standardized outcomes; and guidance to increase patient safety.