Cargando…

Implementing a general practitioner-to-general physician eConsult service (eConsultant) in Australia

BACKGROUND: In response to lengthy wait times for specialist outpatient appointments, electronic consultation (eConsult) services have developed globally, providing asynchronous, secure and timely communication between general practitioner (GP) and specialist. This study aims to track adoption of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Job, Jennifer, Nicholson, Caroline, Calleja, Zoe, Jackson, Claire, Donald, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9589630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36280832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08663-2
_version_ 1784814346162929664
author Job, Jennifer
Nicholson, Caroline
Calleja, Zoe
Jackson, Claire
Donald, Maria
author_facet Job, Jennifer
Nicholson, Caroline
Calleja, Zoe
Jackson, Claire
Donald, Maria
author_sort Job, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In response to lengthy wait times for specialist outpatient appointments, electronic consultation (eConsult) services have developed globally, providing asynchronous, secure and timely communication between general practitioner (GP) and specialist. This study aims to track adoption of a Queensland eConsultant service in two Australian Primary Health Networks (Western Queensland and Brisbane South) to understand key barriers and enablers to adoption and inform modification of the implementation strategy.  METHODS: Our theory-informed mixed-methods evaluation assessed implementation between July 2020 and March 2022. Adoption and implementation activities were prospectively recorded in bespoke tracking spreadsheets with implementation activities coded against the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) strategies. Semi-structured interviews with GPs and stakeholders informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) were conducted to understand determinants of implementation.  RESULTS: Of the 40 practices invited to take part in the eConsultant service, 20 (50%) enrolled. Of the 97 GPs who consented, 38 sent at least one Request for Advice (RFA) to the eConsultant with a total of 112 RFA sent. Implementation was predominantly guided by eight strategies. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 11 GPs and 4 stakeholders (12 from rural/remote regions, 11 females and two sole practitioners). Interviewees felt the eConsultant service supported outpatient appointment avoidance and provided efficient, timely access to specialist support for GPs and their patients. Barriers identified to using eConsultant related to digital infrastructure, competing priorities, and keeping the service ‘front of mind’. Key enablers identified were the relative advantage of eConsultant over other options, patient benefits and COVD-19 facilitating the use of digital technology. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation highlighted service enablers as well as user priorities for broader implementation. A focus on a well-integrated digital system and availability of a variety of eConsultant specialties are seen as key strategies to embedding the eConsultant option in GP advice processes in Australia. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08663-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9589630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95896302022-10-24 Implementing a general practitioner-to-general physician eConsult service (eConsultant) in Australia Job, Jennifer Nicholson, Caroline Calleja, Zoe Jackson, Claire Donald, Maria BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: In response to lengthy wait times for specialist outpatient appointments, electronic consultation (eConsult) services have developed globally, providing asynchronous, secure and timely communication between general practitioner (GP) and specialist. This study aims to track adoption of a Queensland eConsultant service in two Australian Primary Health Networks (Western Queensland and Brisbane South) to understand key barriers and enablers to adoption and inform modification of the implementation strategy.  METHODS: Our theory-informed mixed-methods evaluation assessed implementation between July 2020 and March 2022. Adoption and implementation activities were prospectively recorded in bespoke tracking spreadsheets with implementation activities coded against the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) strategies. Semi-structured interviews with GPs and stakeholders informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) were conducted to understand determinants of implementation.  RESULTS: Of the 40 practices invited to take part in the eConsultant service, 20 (50%) enrolled. Of the 97 GPs who consented, 38 sent at least one Request for Advice (RFA) to the eConsultant with a total of 112 RFA sent. Implementation was predominantly guided by eight strategies. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 11 GPs and 4 stakeholders (12 from rural/remote regions, 11 females and two sole practitioners). Interviewees felt the eConsultant service supported outpatient appointment avoidance and provided efficient, timely access to specialist support for GPs and their patients. Barriers identified to using eConsultant related to digital infrastructure, competing priorities, and keeping the service ‘front of mind’. Key enablers identified were the relative advantage of eConsultant over other options, patient benefits and COVD-19 facilitating the use of digital technology. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation highlighted service enablers as well as user priorities for broader implementation. A focus on a well-integrated digital system and availability of a variety of eConsultant specialties are seen as key strategies to embedding the eConsultant option in GP advice processes in Australia. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08663-2. BioMed Central 2022-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9589630/ /pubmed/36280832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08663-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Job, Jennifer
Nicholson, Caroline
Calleja, Zoe
Jackson, Claire
Donald, Maria
Implementing a general practitioner-to-general physician eConsult service (eConsultant) in Australia
title Implementing a general practitioner-to-general physician eConsult service (eConsultant) in Australia
title_full Implementing a general practitioner-to-general physician eConsult service (eConsultant) in Australia
title_fullStr Implementing a general practitioner-to-general physician eConsult service (eConsultant) in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Implementing a general practitioner-to-general physician eConsult service (eConsultant) in Australia
title_short Implementing a general practitioner-to-general physician eConsult service (eConsultant) in Australia
title_sort implementing a general practitioner-to-general physician econsult service (econsultant) in australia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9589630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36280832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08663-2
work_keys_str_mv AT jobjennifer implementingageneralpractitionertogeneralphysicianeconsultserviceeconsultantinaustralia
AT nicholsoncaroline implementingageneralpractitionertogeneralphysicianeconsultserviceeconsultantinaustralia
AT callejazoe implementingageneralpractitionertogeneralphysicianeconsultserviceeconsultantinaustralia
AT jacksonclaire implementingageneralpractitionertogeneralphysicianeconsultserviceeconsultantinaustralia
AT donaldmaria implementingageneralpractitionertogeneralphysicianeconsultserviceeconsultantinaustralia