Cargando…

Intervention during wait time: identification and referral of individuals non-adherent for colorectal cancer screening

BACKGROUND: Despite unanimous recommendations from numerous specialty societies on regular colorectal cancer screening, a substantial proportion of eligible adults are non-adherent with screening. The current study investigated whether research associates (RAs) in the emergency department (ED) can a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abar, Beau, Park, Chanjun Syd, Dalawari, Preeti, Klausner, Howard, Ogedegbe, Chinwe, Valassis, Steven, Koneswaran, Haran, Adler, David, Bradley, Keith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9589631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36312902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44201-022-00012-7
_version_ 1784814346421927936
author Abar, Beau
Park, Chanjun Syd
Dalawari, Preeti
Klausner, Howard
Ogedegbe, Chinwe
Valassis, Steven
Koneswaran, Haran
Adler, David
Bradley, Keith
author_facet Abar, Beau
Park, Chanjun Syd
Dalawari, Preeti
Klausner, Howard
Ogedegbe, Chinwe
Valassis, Steven
Koneswaran, Haran
Adler, David
Bradley, Keith
author_sort Abar, Beau
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite unanimous recommendations from numerous specialty societies on regular colorectal cancer screening, a substantial proportion of eligible adults are non-adherent with screening. The current study investigated whether research associates (RAs) in the emergency department (ED) can adequately assess patients’ adherence with colorectal cancer screening recommendations, outlined by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), and provide referrals to individuals who are found to be non-adherent. METHODS: RAs at seven heterogeneous hospitals in the USA queried non-emergent adult patients and visitors between the ages of 50 and 75. After obtaining verbal consent, the participant’s adherence with USPSTF guidelines for colorectal cancer screening was assessed. Participants found due for screening were provided with referrals to obtain these recommended screenings. RESULTS: A total of 8258 participants were surveyed on their colorectal cancer screening status, with RAs identifying 2063 participants who were not adherent with USPSTF guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and 67 for whom adherence could not be determined (total 27%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that RAs can identify a large volume of eligible adults who would benefit from colorectal cancer screening across a variety of emergency department settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9589631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95896312022-10-24 Intervention during wait time: identification and referral of individuals non-adherent for colorectal cancer screening Abar, Beau Park, Chanjun Syd Dalawari, Preeti Klausner, Howard Ogedegbe, Chinwe Valassis, Steven Koneswaran, Haran Adler, David Bradley, Keith Emerg Cancer Care Research BACKGROUND: Despite unanimous recommendations from numerous specialty societies on regular colorectal cancer screening, a substantial proportion of eligible adults are non-adherent with screening. The current study investigated whether research associates (RAs) in the emergency department (ED) can adequately assess patients’ adherence with colorectal cancer screening recommendations, outlined by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), and provide referrals to individuals who are found to be non-adherent. METHODS: RAs at seven heterogeneous hospitals in the USA queried non-emergent adult patients and visitors between the ages of 50 and 75. After obtaining verbal consent, the participant’s adherence with USPSTF guidelines for colorectal cancer screening was assessed. Participants found due for screening were provided with referrals to obtain these recommended screenings. RESULTS: A total of 8258 participants were surveyed on their colorectal cancer screening status, with RAs identifying 2063 participants who were not adherent with USPSTF guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and 67 for whom adherence could not be determined (total 27%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that RAs can identify a large volume of eligible adults who would benefit from colorectal cancer screening across a variety of emergency department settings. BioMed Central 2022-10-21 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9589631/ /pubmed/36312902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44201-022-00012-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Abar, Beau
Park, Chanjun Syd
Dalawari, Preeti
Klausner, Howard
Ogedegbe, Chinwe
Valassis, Steven
Koneswaran, Haran
Adler, David
Bradley, Keith
Intervention during wait time: identification and referral of individuals non-adherent for colorectal cancer screening
title Intervention during wait time: identification and referral of individuals non-adherent for colorectal cancer screening
title_full Intervention during wait time: identification and referral of individuals non-adherent for colorectal cancer screening
title_fullStr Intervention during wait time: identification and referral of individuals non-adherent for colorectal cancer screening
title_full_unstemmed Intervention during wait time: identification and referral of individuals non-adherent for colorectal cancer screening
title_short Intervention during wait time: identification and referral of individuals non-adherent for colorectal cancer screening
title_sort intervention during wait time: identification and referral of individuals non-adherent for colorectal cancer screening
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9589631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36312902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44201-022-00012-7
work_keys_str_mv AT abarbeau interventionduringwaittimeidentificationandreferralofindividualsnonadherentforcolorectalcancerscreening
AT parkchanjunsyd interventionduringwaittimeidentificationandreferralofindividualsnonadherentforcolorectalcancerscreening
AT dalawaripreeti interventionduringwaittimeidentificationandreferralofindividualsnonadherentforcolorectalcancerscreening
AT klausnerhoward interventionduringwaittimeidentificationandreferralofindividualsnonadherentforcolorectalcancerscreening
AT ogedegbechinwe interventionduringwaittimeidentificationandreferralofindividualsnonadherentforcolorectalcancerscreening
AT valassissteven interventionduringwaittimeidentificationandreferralofindividualsnonadherentforcolorectalcancerscreening
AT koneswaranharan interventionduringwaittimeidentificationandreferralofindividualsnonadherentforcolorectalcancerscreening
AT adlerdavid interventionduringwaittimeidentificationandreferralofindividualsnonadherentforcolorectalcancerscreening
AT bradleykeith interventionduringwaittimeidentificationandreferralofindividualsnonadherentforcolorectalcancerscreening