Cargando…
An external validation of the nocera nomogram: Predicting non-organ confined stage of ≥pT3 in cT1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma
BACKGROUND: Only one previously published study by Nocera et al. addressed the risk of upstaging to ≥pT3 in cT1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) by using characteristics of the R.E.N.A.L and PADUA score (age, tumor size, rim location, exophytic rate, polar involvement) developing an accurate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9589884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36300101 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1019057 |
_version_ | 1784814394227556352 |
---|---|
author | Wenzel, Mike Hoeh, Benedikt Rührup, Jessica Gambetta, Hanna Nocera, Luigi Würnschimmel, Christoph Tian, Zhe Karakiewicz, Pierre I. Briganti, Alberto Chun, Felix K.H. Roos, Frederik C. Becker, Andreas Krimphove, Marieke J. |
author_facet | Wenzel, Mike Hoeh, Benedikt Rührup, Jessica Gambetta, Hanna Nocera, Luigi Würnschimmel, Christoph Tian, Zhe Karakiewicz, Pierre I. Briganti, Alberto Chun, Felix K.H. Roos, Frederik C. Becker, Andreas Krimphove, Marieke J. |
author_sort | Wenzel, Mike |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Only one previously published study by Nocera et al. addressed the risk of upstaging to ≥pT3 in cT1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) by using characteristics of the R.E.N.A.L and PADUA score (age, tumor size, rim location, exophytic rate, polar involvement) developing an accurate nomogram. However, this nomogram has never been externally validated yet. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 288 patients with cT1a-b ccRCC, diagnosed between 2008-2021 at the University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany. Analyses addressed clinical, tumor and radiographic characteristics. The external validation of the nomogram relied on accuracy calculations derived from the area under the curve of the receiver operator characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 11.8% (n=34) patients harbored ≥pT3 ccRCC. Median radiographic tumor size (3.6 vs. 5.3cm), R.E.N.A.L. (8 vs. 9 points) and PADUA score (9 vs. 11 points), as well as proportions of renal sinus involvement (82.4% vs. 51.6%), renal hilus involvement (44.1 vs. 13.0%), and medial rim location significantly differed between the pT1-2 and ≥pT3 group (all p ≤ 0.01). In subgroup analyses of small renal mass ccRCC patients (<4cm, cT1a), only 3.8% (n=6) patients had ≥pT3 pathology. Upstaged patients were significantly older and more frequently had endophytic tumor than pT1-2 counterparts (p<0.05). The external validation of the Nocera nomogram showed a good accuracy of 76.6%. Using the suggested cut-off of 21%, 26.5% of patients exhibited ≥pT3 ccRCC. Conversely, within patients below cut-off, 5.9% patients exhibited ≥pT3 ccRCC. CONCLUSION: We reported the first external validation of the nomogram addressing the risk of ≥pT3 in cT1 ccRCC patients, demonstrating a good accuracy, with a low false-negative rate. Therefore, the nomogram can accurately be used for patients’ counselling and treatment decision making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9589884 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95898842022-10-25 An external validation of the nocera nomogram: Predicting non-organ confined stage of ≥pT3 in cT1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma Wenzel, Mike Hoeh, Benedikt Rührup, Jessica Gambetta, Hanna Nocera, Luigi Würnschimmel, Christoph Tian, Zhe Karakiewicz, Pierre I. Briganti, Alberto Chun, Felix K.H. Roos, Frederik C. Becker, Andreas Krimphove, Marieke J. Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Only one previously published study by Nocera et al. addressed the risk of upstaging to ≥pT3 in cT1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) by using characteristics of the R.E.N.A.L and PADUA score (age, tumor size, rim location, exophytic rate, polar involvement) developing an accurate nomogram. However, this nomogram has never been externally validated yet. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 288 patients with cT1a-b ccRCC, diagnosed between 2008-2021 at the University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany. Analyses addressed clinical, tumor and radiographic characteristics. The external validation of the nomogram relied on accuracy calculations derived from the area under the curve of the receiver operator characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 11.8% (n=34) patients harbored ≥pT3 ccRCC. Median radiographic tumor size (3.6 vs. 5.3cm), R.E.N.A.L. (8 vs. 9 points) and PADUA score (9 vs. 11 points), as well as proportions of renal sinus involvement (82.4% vs. 51.6%), renal hilus involvement (44.1 vs. 13.0%), and medial rim location significantly differed between the pT1-2 and ≥pT3 group (all p ≤ 0.01). In subgroup analyses of small renal mass ccRCC patients (<4cm, cT1a), only 3.8% (n=6) patients had ≥pT3 pathology. Upstaged patients were significantly older and more frequently had endophytic tumor than pT1-2 counterparts (p<0.05). The external validation of the Nocera nomogram showed a good accuracy of 76.6%. Using the suggested cut-off of 21%, 26.5% of patients exhibited ≥pT3 ccRCC. Conversely, within patients below cut-off, 5.9% patients exhibited ≥pT3 ccRCC. CONCLUSION: We reported the first external validation of the nomogram addressing the risk of ≥pT3 in cT1 ccRCC patients, demonstrating a good accuracy, with a low false-negative rate. Therefore, the nomogram can accurately be used for patients’ counselling and treatment decision making. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9589884/ /pubmed/36300101 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1019057 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wenzel, Hoeh, Rührup, Gambetta, Nocera, Würnschimmel, Tian, Karakiewicz, Briganti, Chun, Roos, Becker and Krimphove https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Wenzel, Mike Hoeh, Benedikt Rührup, Jessica Gambetta, Hanna Nocera, Luigi Würnschimmel, Christoph Tian, Zhe Karakiewicz, Pierre I. Briganti, Alberto Chun, Felix K.H. Roos, Frederik C. Becker, Andreas Krimphove, Marieke J. An external validation of the nocera nomogram: Predicting non-organ confined stage of ≥pT3 in cT1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma |
title | An external validation of the nocera nomogram: Predicting non-organ confined stage of ≥pT3 in cT1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma |
title_full | An external validation of the nocera nomogram: Predicting non-organ confined stage of ≥pT3 in cT1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma |
title_fullStr | An external validation of the nocera nomogram: Predicting non-organ confined stage of ≥pT3 in cT1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | An external validation of the nocera nomogram: Predicting non-organ confined stage of ≥pT3 in cT1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma |
title_short | An external validation of the nocera nomogram: Predicting non-organ confined stage of ≥pT3 in cT1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma |
title_sort | external validation of the nocera nomogram: predicting non-organ confined stage of ≥pt3 in ct1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9589884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36300101 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1019057 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wenzelmike anexternalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT hoehbenedikt anexternalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT ruhrupjessica anexternalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT gambettahanna anexternalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT noceraluigi anexternalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT wurnschimmelchristoph anexternalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT tianzhe anexternalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT karakiewiczpierrei anexternalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT brigantialberto anexternalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT chunfelixkh anexternalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT roosfrederikc anexternalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT beckerandreas anexternalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT krimphovemariekej anexternalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT wenzelmike externalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT hoehbenedikt externalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT ruhrupjessica externalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT gambettahanna externalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT noceraluigi externalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT wurnschimmelchristoph externalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT tianzhe externalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT karakiewiczpierrei externalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT brigantialberto externalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT chunfelixkh externalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT roosfrederikc externalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT beckerandreas externalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma AT krimphovemariekej externalvalidationofthenoceranomogrampredictingnonorganconfinedstageofpt3inct1clearcellrenalcellcarcinoma |