Cargando…

Addressing spatial bias in intracranial EEG functional connectivity analyses for epilepsy surgical planning

Objective. To determine the effect of epilepsy on intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) functional connectivity, and the ability of functional connectivity to localize the seizure onset zone (SOZ), controlling for spatial biases. Approach. We analyzed intracranial EEG data from patients with dru...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conrad, Erin C, Bernabei, John M, Sinha, Nishant, Ghosn, Nina J, Stein, Joel M, Shinohara, Russell T, Litt, Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOP Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9590099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36084621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ac90ed
_version_ 1784814442443177984
author Conrad, Erin C
Bernabei, John M
Sinha, Nishant
Ghosn, Nina J
Stein, Joel M
Shinohara, Russell T
Litt, Brian
author_facet Conrad, Erin C
Bernabei, John M
Sinha, Nishant
Ghosn, Nina J
Stein, Joel M
Shinohara, Russell T
Litt, Brian
author_sort Conrad, Erin C
collection PubMed
description Objective. To determine the effect of epilepsy on intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) functional connectivity, and the ability of functional connectivity to localize the seizure onset zone (SOZ), controlling for spatial biases. Approach. We analyzed intracranial EEG data from patients with drug-resistant epilepsy admitted for pre-surgical planning. We calculated intracranial EEG functional networks and determined whether changes in functional connectivity lateralized the SOZ using a spatial subsampling method to control for spatial bias. We developed a ‘spatial null model’ to localize the SOZ electrode using only spatial sampling information, ignoring EEG data. We compared the performance of this spatial null model against models incorporating EEG functional connectivity and interictal spike rates. Main results. About 110 patients were included in the study, although the number of patients differed across analyses. Controlling for spatial sampling, the average connectivity was lower in the SOZ region relative to the same anatomic region in the contralateral hemisphere. A model using intra-hemispheric connectivity accurately lateralized the SOZ (average accuracy 75.5%). A spatial null model incorporating spatial sampling information alone achieved moderate accuracy in classifying SOZ electrodes (mean AUC = 0.70, 95% CI 0.63–0.77). A model incorporating intracranial EEG functional connectivity and spike rate data further outperformed this spatial null model (AUC 0.78, p = 0.002 compared to spatial null model). However, a model incorporating functional connectivity without spike rate data did not significantly outperform the null model (AUC 0.72, p = 0.38). Significance. Intracranial EEG functional connectivity is reduced in the SOZ region, and interictal data predict SOZ electrode localization and laterality, however a predictive model incorporating functional connectivity without interictal spike rates did not significantly outperform a spatial null model. We propose constructing a spatial null model to provide an estimate of the pre-implant hypothesis of the SOZ, and to serve as a benchmark for further machine learning algorithms in order to avoid overestimating model performance because of electrode sampling alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9590099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95900992022-10-24 Addressing spatial bias in intracranial EEG functional connectivity analyses for epilepsy surgical planning Conrad, Erin C Bernabei, John M Sinha, Nishant Ghosn, Nina J Stein, Joel M Shinohara, Russell T Litt, Brian J Neural Eng Paper Objective. To determine the effect of epilepsy on intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) functional connectivity, and the ability of functional connectivity to localize the seizure onset zone (SOZ), controlling for spatial biases. Approach. We analyzed intracranial EEG data from patients with drug-resistant epilepsy admitted for pre-surgical planning. We calculated intracranial EEG functional networks and determined whether changes in functional connectivity lateralized the SOZ using a spatial subsampling method to control for spatial bias. We developed a ‘spatial null model’ to localize the SOZ electrode using only spatial sampling information, ignoring EEG data. We compared the performance of this spatial null model against models incorporating EEG functional connectivity and interictal spike rates. Main results. About 110 patients were included in the study, although the number of patients differed across analyses. Controlling for spatial sampling, the average connectivity was lower in the SOZ region relative to the same anatomic region in the contralateral hemisphere. A model using intra-hemispheric connectivity accurately lateralized the SOZ (average accuracy 75.5%). A spatial null model incorporating spatial sampling information alone achieved moderate accuracy in classifying SOZ electrodes (mean AUC = 0.70, 95% CI 0.63–0.77). A model incorporating intracranial EEG functional connectivity and spike rate data further outperformed this spatial null model (AUC 0.78, p = 0.002 compared to spatial null model). However, a model incorporating functional connectivity without spike rate data did not significantly outperform the null model (AUC 0.72, p = 0.38). Significance. Intracranial EEG functional connectivity is reduced in the SOZ region, and interictal data predict SOZ electrode localization and laterality, however a predictive model incorporating functional connectivity without interictal spike rates did not significantly outperform a spatial null model. We propose constructing a spatial null model to provide an estimate of the pre-implant hypothesis of the SOZ, and to serve as a benchmark for further machine learning algorithms in order to avoid overestimating model performance because of electrode sampling alone. IOP Publishing 2022-10-01 2022-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9590099/ /pubmed/36084621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ac90ed Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
spellingShingle Paper
Conrad, Erin C
Bernabei, John M
Sinha, Nishant
Ghosn, Nina J
Stein, Joel M
Shinohara, Russell T
Litt, Brian
Addressing spatial bias in intracranial EEG functional connectivity analyses for epilepsy surgical planning
title Addressing spatial bias in intracranial EEG functional connectivity analyses for epilepsy surgical planning
title_full Addressing spatial bias in intracranial EEG functional connectivity analyses for epilepsy surgical planning
title_fullStr Addressing spatial bias in intracranial EEG functional connectivity analyses for epilepsy surgical planning
title_full_unstemmed Addressing spatial bias in intracranial EEG functional connectivity analyses for epilepsy surgical planning
title_short Addressing spatial bias in intracranial EEG functional connectivity analyses for epilepsy surgical planning
title_sort addressing spatial bias in intracranial eeg functional connectivity analyses for epilepsy surgical planning
topic Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9590099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36084621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ac90ed
work_keys_str_mv AT conraderinc addressingspatialbiasinintracranialeegfunctionalconnectivityanalysesforepilepsysurgicalplanning
AT bernabeijohnm addressingspatialbiasinintracranialeegfunctionalconnectivityanalysesforepilepsysurgicalplanning
AT sinhanishant addressingspatialbiasinintracranialeegfunctionalconnectivityanalysesforepilepsysurgicalplanning
AT ghosnninaj addressingspatialbiasinintracranialeegfunctionalconnectivityanalysesforepilepsysurgicalplanning
AT steinjoelm addressingspatialbiasinintracranialeegfunctionalconnectivityanalysesforepilepsysurgicalplanning
AT shinohararussellt addressingspatialbiasinintracranialeegfunctionalconnectivityanalysesforepilepsysurgicalplanning
AT littbrian addressingspatialbiasinintracranialeegfunctionalconnectivityanalysesforepilepsysurgicalplanning