Cargando…
The use of 3D ceramic block graft compared with autogenous block graft for rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla: a randomized controlled clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Dental implant placement may require a bone graft for vertical and horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation. Due to its osteoconduction, osteoinductive, and osteogenesis, autogenous bone graft characteristics are considered the standard gold treatment. However, autografts can promote posto...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9590225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36274166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06843-3 |
_version_ | 1784814469627510784 |
---|---|
author | de Almeida Malzoni, Carolina Mendonça Gonçalves, Victor Possari, Juliana Junior, Elcio Marcantonio |
author_facet | de Almeida Malzoni, Carolina Mendonça Gonçalves, Victor Possari, Juliana Junior, Elcio Marcantonio |
author_sort | de Almeida Malzoni, Carolina Mendonça |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dental implant placement may require a bone graft for vertical and horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation. Due to its osteoconduction, osteoinductive, and osteogenesis, autogenous bone graft characteristics are considered the standard gold treatment. However, autografts can promote postoperative morbidity and implicate difficulties concerning the graft adaptation to the recipient's bone since it can eventually avoid gaps. To overcome these issues, this trial will compare the performance of Plenum(®) Oss 3D(β) fit, an alloplastic graft, and a 3D-printed patient-specific graft based on β-tricalcium phosphate to the autograft procedure. METHODS: This is a split-mouth randomized clinical study designed to evaluate the performance of personalized (patient-specific) bioceramic bone grafts (Plenum(®) Oss 3D(β) fit) for bone augmentation of the atrophic anterior maxilla in comparison to the autogenous bone graft. We hypothesize that the gain and maintenance of the grafted area volume and the quality of the newly formed bone tissue after eight months postoperative with the synthetic patient-specific graft will be superior to the autogenous bone graft. To assess the quantity and the quality of bone neoformation, volumetric and histological analyses will be performed. DISCUSSION: The fabrication of medical devices by additive manufacturing presents advantages over conventional manufacturing processes, mostly related to the precision of geometry and anatomy. Additionally, the osteoconductive proprieties of β-tricalcium phosphate enable this synthetic bone substitute as an alternative solution over autogenous graft for bone defect reconstruction. Thus, patient-specific bone grafts can potentially improve patient satisfaction, reducing the need for autogenous bone grafts, consequently avoiding implications related to this type of treatment, such as patient morbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered in REBEC (Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos): RBR-76wmm3q; UTN: U1111-1272-7773. Registration date: 14 September 2021. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9590225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95902252022-10-25 The use of 3D ceramic block graft compared with autogenous block graft for rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla: a randomized controlled clinical trial de Almeida Malzoni, Carolina Mendonça Gonçalves, Victor Possari, Juliana Junior, Elcio Marcantonio Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Dental implant placement may require a bone graft for vertical and horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation. Due to its osteoconduction, osteoinductive, and osteogenesis, autogenous bone graft characteristics are considered the standard gold treatment. However, autografts can promote postoperative morbidity and implicate difficulties concerning the graft adaptation to the recipient's bone since it can eventually avoid gaps. To overcome these issues, this trial will compare the performance of Plenum(®) Oss 3D(β) fit, an alloplastic graft, and a 3D-printed patient-specific graft based on β-tricalcium phosphate to the autograft procedure. METHODS: This is a split-mouth randomized clinical study designed to evaluate the performance of personalized (patient-specific) bioceramic bone grafts (Plenum(®) Oss 3D(β) fit) for bone augmentation of the atrophic anterior maxilla in comparison to the autogenous bone graft. We hypothesize that the gain and maintenance of the grafted area volume and the quality of the newly formed bone tissue after eight months postoperative with the synthetic patient-specific graft will be superior to the autogenous bone graft. To assess the quantity and the quality of bone neoformation, volumetric and histological analyses will be performed. DISCUSSION: The fabrication of medical devices by additive manufacturing presents advantages over conventional manufacturing processes, mostly related to the precision of geometry and anatomy. Additionally, the osteoconductive proprieties of β-tricalcium phosphate enable this synthetic bone substitute as an alternative solution over autogenous graft for bone defect reconstruction. Thus, patient-specific bone grafts can potentially improve patient satisfaction, reducing the need for autogenous bone grafts, consequently avoiding implications related to this type of treatment, such as patient morbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered in REBEC (Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos): RBR-76wmm3q; UTN: U1111-1272-7773. Registration date: 14 September 2021. BioMed Central 2022-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9590225/ /pubmed/36274166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06843-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol de Almeida Malzoni, Carolina Mendonça Gonçalves, Victor Possari, Juliana Junior, Elcio Marcantonio The use of 3D ceramic block graft compared with autogenous block graft for rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
title | The use of 3D ceramic block graft compared with autogenous block graft for rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
title_full | The use of 3D ceramic block graft compared with autogenous block graft for rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
title_fullStr | The use of 3D ceramic block graft compared with autogenous block graft for rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of 3D ceramic block graft compared with autogenous block graft for rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
title_short | The use of 3D ceramic block graft compared with autogenous block graft for rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
title_sort | use of 3d ceramic block graft compared with autogenous block graft for rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9590225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36274166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06843-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dealmeidamalzonicarolinamendonca theuseof3dceramicblockgraftcomparedwithautogenousblockgraftforrehabilitationoftheatrophicmaxillaarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT goncalvesvictor theuseof3dceramicblockgraftcomparedwithautogenousblockgraftforrehabilitationoftheatrophicmaxillaarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT possarijuliana theuseof3dceramicblockgraftcomparedwithautogenousblockgraftforrehabilitationoftheatrophicmaxillaarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT juniorelciomarcantonio theuseof3dceramicblockgraftcomparedwithautogenousblockgraftforrehabilitationoftheatrophicmaxillaarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT dealmeidamalzonicarolinamendonca useof3dceramicblockgraftcomparedwithautogenousblockgraftforrehabilitationoftheatrophicmaxillaarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT goncalvesvictor useof3dceramicblockgraftcomparedwithautogenousblockgraftforrehabilitationoftheatrophicmaxillaarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT possarijuliana useof3dceramicblockgraftcomparedwithautogenousblockgraftforrehabilitationoftheatrophicmaxillaarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT juniorelciomarcantonio useof3dceramicblockgraftcomparedwithautogenousblockgraftforrehabilitationoftheatrophicmaxillaarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial |