Cargando…

Measuring equality in access to urban parks: A big data analysis from Chengdu

Spatial equality of parks is a significant issue in environmental justice studies. In cities with high-density development and limited land resources, this study uses a supply-demand adjusted two-step floating catchment area model (2SFCA), paying attention to residents' subjective preferences a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dai, Weiwei, Yuan, Suyang, Liu, Yangyang, Peng, Dan, Niu, Shaofei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9590313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36299754
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1022666
_version_ 1784814485592080384
author Dai, Weiwei
Yuan, Suyang
Liu, Yangyang
Peng, Dan
Niu, Shaofei
author_facet Dai, Weiwei
Yuan, Suyang
Liu, Yangyang
Peng, Dan
Niu, Shaofei
author_sort Dai, Weiwei
collection PubMed
description Spatial equality of parks is a significant issue in environmental justice studies. In cities with high-density development and limited land resources, this study uses a supply-demand adjusted two-step floating catchment area model (2SFCA), paying attention to residents' subjective preferences and psychological accessibility. It assesses equality of access to urban parks from two dimensions: spatial equality and quantitative equality at a fine scale of 100 × 100 m grid resolution. The spatial equality of urban parks in Chengdu is measured under different transportation modes (walking, cycling, and driving) based on multi-source geospatial big data and machine learning approaches. The results show: (1) There were significant differences in the spatial distribution of park accessibility under different modes of transportation. The spatial distribution under walking was significantly influenced by the park itself, while the distribution of rivers significantly influenced the spatial distribution under cycling and driving; (2) Accessibility to urban parks was almost universally equal in terms of driving, relatively equal in terms of cycling, and seriously unequal in terms of walking; (3) Spatial local autocorrelation analysis shows that park accessibility tended to be significantly clustered, with little spatial variation; and (4) The supply and demand of urban parks were relatively equal. The results can help urban planners to formulate effective strategies to alleviate spatial inequality more reasonably and precisely. The applied research methods can further improve the system of scientific evaluation from a new perspective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9590313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95903132022-10-25 Measuring equality in access to urban parks: A big data analysis from Chengdu Dai, Weiwei Yuan, Suyang Liu, Yangyang Peng, Dan Niu, Shaofei Front Public Health Public Health Spatial equality of parks is a significant issue in environmental justice studies. In cities with high-density development and limited land resources, this study uses a supply-demand adjusted two-step floating catchment area model (2SFCA), paying attention to residents' subjective preferences and psychological accessibility. It assesses equality of access to urban parks from two dimensions: spatial equality and quantitative equality at a fine scale of 100 × 100 m grid resolution. The spatial equality of urban parks in Chengdu is measured under different transportation modes (walking, cycling, and driving) based on multi-source geospatial big data and machine learning approaches. The results show: (1) There were significant differences in the spatial distribution of park accessibility under different modes of transportation. The spatial distribution under walking was significantly influenced by the park itself, while the distribution of rivers significantly influenced the spatial distribution under cycling and driving; (2) Accessibility to urban parks was almost universally equal in terms of driving, relatively equal in terms of cycling, and seriously unequal in terms of walking; (3) Spatial local autocorrelation analysis shows that park accessibility tended to be significantly clustered, with little spatial variation; and (4) The supply and demand of urban parks were relatively equal. The results can help urban planners to formulate effective strategies to alleviate spatial inequality more reasonably and precisely. The applied research methods can further improve the system of scientific evaluation from a new perspective. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9590313/ /pubmed/36299754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1022666 Text en Copyright © 2022 Dai, Yuan, Liu, Peng and Niu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Dai, Weiwei
Yuan, Suyang
Liu, Yangyang
Peng, Dan
Niu, Shaofei
Measuring equality in access to urban parks: A big data analysis from Chengdu
title Measuring equality in access to urban parks: A big data analysis from Chengdu
title_full Measuring equality in access to urban parks: A big data analysis from Chengdu
title_fullStr Measuring equality in access to urban parks: A big data analysis from Chengdu
title_full_unstemmed Measuring equality in access to urban parks: A big data analysis from Chengdu
title_short Measuring equality in access to urban parks: A big data analysis from Chengdu
title_sort measuring equality in access to urban parks: a big data analysis from chengdu
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9590313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36299754
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1022666
work_keys_str_mv AT daiweiwei measuringequalityinaccesstourbanparksabigdataanalysisfromchengdu
AT yuansuyang measuringequalityinaccesstourbanparksabigdataanalysisfromchengdu
AT liuyangyang measuringequalityinaccesstourbanparksabigdataanalysisfromchengdu
AT pengdan measuringequalityinaccesstourbanparksabigdataanalysisfromchengdu
AT niushaofei measuringequalityinaccesstourbanparksabigdataanalysisfromchengdu