Cargando…

Development of a Scientific Writing Course to Increase Fellow Scholarship

Physicians in training are often taught how to conduct original research but may lack the skills necessary to write their results in a paper for the peer-reviewed medical literature. To help our critical care fellows increase their publication rates, we implemented an 8-hour scientific writing cours...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Amy L., Chaisson, Neal F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Thoracic Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9590585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36312809
http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0023PS
_version_ 1784814524904243200
author Moore, Amy L.
Chaisson, Neal F.
author_facet Moore, Amy L.
Chaisson, Neal F.
author_sort Moore, Amy L.
collection PubMed
description Physicians in training are often taught how to conduct original research but may lack the skills necessary to write their results in a paper for the peer-reviewed medical literature. To help our critical care fellows increase their publication rates, we implemented an 8-hour scientific writing course that provides a structured approach to writing an academic research paper. We have demonstrated an increase in publication rate during fellowship from an average of 0.7 manuscripts per fellow just before course inception to 3.7 manuscripts per fellow in the current graduating class. We highlight strategies for developing a writing course aligned with adult learning theory within three key areas: planning, pedagogy, and implementation. Planning strategies center around creating a case for change, including multiple stakeholders with diverse backgrounds, including the research mentor, and ensuring accountability among stakeholders. Pedagogical strategies focus on harnessing the power of experiential learning, considering a flipped classroom approach, and peer teaching to leverage social and cognitive congruence. Implementation strategies include breaking down the writing process into manageable tasks, organizing the writing process according to learner needs, using peer review processes to drive learning, and celebrating the accomplishments of learners within the course. These strategies represent broad initiatives that can be tailored to local training needs and instituted across a wide variety of teaching platforms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9590585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Thoracic Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95905852022-10-27 Development of a Scientific Writing Course to Increase Fellow Scholarship Moore, Amy L. Chaisson, Neal F. ATS Sch Perspectives Physicians in training are often taught how to conduct original research but may lack the skills necessary to write their results in a paper for the peer-reviewed medical literature. To help our critical care fellows increase their publication rates, we implemented an 8-hour scientific writing course that provides a structured approach to writing an academic research paper. We have demonstrated an increase in publication rate during fellowship from an average of 0.7 manuscripts per fellow just before course inception to 3.7 manuscripts per fellow in the current graduating class. We highlight strategies for developing a writing course aligned with adult learning theory within three key areas: planning, pedagogy, and implementation. Planning strategies center around creating a case for change, including multiple stakeholders with diverse backgrounds, including the research mentor, and ensuring accountability among stakeholders. Pedagogical strategies focus on harnessing the power of experiential learning, considering a flipped classroom approach, and peer teaching to leverage social and cognitive congruence. Implementation strategies include breaking down the writing process into manageable tasks, organizing the writing process according to learner needs, using peer review processes to drive learning, and celebrating the accomplishments of learners within the course. These strategies represent broad initiatives that can be tailored to local training needs and instituted across a wide variety of teaching platforms. American Thoracic Society 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9590585/ /pubmed/36312809 http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0023PS Text en Copyright © 2022 by the American Thoracic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . For commercial usage and reprints, please e-mail Diane Gern.
spellingShingle Perspectives
Moore, Amy L.
Chaisson, Neal F.
Development of a Scientific Writing Course to Increase Fellow Scholarship
title Development of a Scientific Writing Course to Increase Fellow Scholarship
title_full Development of a Scientific Writing Course to Increase Fellow Scholarship
title_fullStr Development of a Scientific Writing Course to Increase Fellow Scholarship
title_full_unstemmed Development of a Scientific Writing Course to Increase Fellow Scholarship
title_short Development of a Scientific Writing Course to Increase Fellow Scholarship
title_sort development of a scientific writing course to increase fellow scholarship
topic Perspectives
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9590585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36312809
http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0023PS
work_keys_str_mv AT mooreamyl developmentofascientificwritingcoursetoincreasefellowscholarship
AT chaissonnealf developmentofascientificwritingcoursetoincreasefellowscholarship