Cargando…
Comparison of pre-treatment and in-vivo dosimetry for advanced radiotherapy of prostate cancer
BACKGROUND: The usage of advanced radiotherapy techniques requires validation of a previously calculated dose with the precise delivery with a linear accelerator. This study aimed to review and evaluate new verification methods of dose distribution. Moreover, our purpose was to define an internal pr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Via Medica
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9591023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36299396 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0027 |
_version_ | 1784814620120186880 |
---|---|
author | Bartnikowska, Agnieszka Cieślik, Grzegorz Młodzik, Mateusz Garcia-Argibay, Miguel |
author_facet | Bartnikowska, Agnieszka Cieślik, Grzegorz Młodzik, Mateusz Garcia-Argibay, Miguel |
author_sort | Bartnikowska, Agnieszka |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The usage of advanced radiotherapy techniques requires validation of a previously calculated dose with the precise delivery with a linear accelerator. This study aimed to review and evaluate new verification methods of dose distribution. Moreover, our purpose was to define an internal protocol of acceptance for in-vivo measurements of dose distribution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 43 treatment plans of prostate cancer calculated using the Monte Carlo algorithm. All plans were delivered using the Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) technique of advanced radiotherapy by the linear accelerator Elekta VersaHD. The dose distribution was verified using: MatriXX, iViewDose, and in-vivo measurements. The verification also included recalculation of fluence maps of quality assurance plans in another independent algorithm. RESULTS: The acceptance criterion of 95% points of dose in agreement was found for pre-treatment verification using MatriXX; the average γ value was 99.09 ± 0.93 (SD) and 99.64 ± 0.35 (SD) for recalculation in the Collapse Cone algorithm. Moreover, using the second algorithm in the verification process showed a positive correlation ρ = 0.58, p < 0.001. However, verification using iViewDose in a phantom and in-vivo did not meet this γ-pass rate. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of gamma values for in-vivo measurements utilizing iViewDose software was helpful to establish an internal dosimetry protocol for prostate cancer treatments. We assumed value at a minimum of 50% points of the dose in agreement with the 3%/3 mm criterion as an acceptable compliance level. The recalculated dose distribution of QA plans in regard to the Collapse Cone algorithm in the other treatment planning system can be used as a pre-treatment verification method used by a medical physicist in their daily work. The effectiveness of use in iViewDose software, as a pre-treatment tool, is still debatable, unlike the MatriXX device. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9591023 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Via Medica |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95910232022-10-25 Comparison of pre-treatment and in-vivo dosimetry for advanced radiotherapy of prostate cancer Bartnikowska, Agnieszka Cieślik, Grzegorz Młodzik, Mateusz Garcia-Argibay, Miguel Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Research Paper BACKGROUND: The usage of advanced radiotherapy techniques requires validation of a previously calculated dose with the precise delivery with a linear accelerator. This study aimed to review and evaluate new verification methods of dose distribution. Moreover, our purpose was to define an internal protocol of acceptance for in-vivo measurements of dose distribution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 43 treatment plans of prostate cancer calculated using the Monte Carlo algorithm. All plans were delivered using the Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) technique of advanced radiotherapy by the linear accelerator Elekta VersaHD. The dose distribution was verified using: MatriXX, iViewDose, and in-vivo measurements. The verification also included recalculation of fluence maps of quality assurance plans in another independent algorithm. RESULTS: The acceptance criterion of 95% points of dose in agreement was found for pre-treatment verification using MatriXX; the average γ value was 99.09 ± 0.93 (SD) and 99.64 ± 0.35 (SD) for recalculation in the Collapse Cone algorithm. Moreover, using the second algorithm in the verification process showed a positive correlation ρ = 0.58, p < 0.001. However, verification using iViewDose in a phantom and in-vivo did not meet this γ-pass rate. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of gamma values for in-vivo measurements utilizing iViewDose software was helpful to establish an internal dosimetry protocol for prostate cancer treatments. We assumed value at a minimum of 50% points of the dose in agreement with the 3%/3 mm criterion as an acceptable compliance level. The recalculated dose distribution of QA plans in regard to the Collapse Cone algorithm in the other treatment planning system can be used as a pre-treatment verification method used by a medical physicist in their daily work. The effectiveness of use in iViewDose software, as a pre-treatment tool, is still debatable, unlike the MatriXX device. Via Medica 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9591023/ /pubmed/36299396 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0027 Text en © 2022 Greater Poland Cancer Centre https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Bartnikowska, Agnieszka Cieślik, Grzegorz Młodzik, Mateusz Garcia-Argibay, Miguel Comparison of pre-treatment and in-vivo dosimetry for advanced radiotherapy of prostate cancer |
title | Comparison of pre-treatment and in-vivo dosimetry for advanced radiotherapy of prostate cancer |
title_full | Comparison of pre-treatment and in-vivo dosimetry for advanced radiotherapy of prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | Comparison of pre-treatment and in-vivo dosimetry for advanced radiotherapy of prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of pre-treatment and in-vivo dosimetry for advanced radiotherapy of prostate cancer |
title_short | Comparison of pre-treatment and in-vivo dosimetry for advanced radiotherapy of prostate cancer |
title_sort | comparison of pre-treatment and in-vivo dosimetry for advanced radiotherapy of prostate cancer |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9591023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36299396 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bartnikowskaagnieszka comparisonofpretreatmentandinvivodosimetryforadvancedradiotherapyofprostatecancer AT cieslikgrzegorz comparisonofpretreatmentandinvivodosimetryforadvancedradiotherapyofprostatecancer AT młodzikmateusz comparisonofpretreatmentandinvivodosimetryforadvancedradiotherapyofprostatecancer AT garciaargibaymiguel comparisonofpretreatmentandinvivodosimetryforadvancedradiotherapyofprostatecancer |