Cargando…

Hypofractionated radiotherapy in young versus older women with breast cancer: a retrospective study from India

BACKGROUND: Young women with breast cancer (BC) are not represented in the trials on hypofractionation. In this study we compared outcomes in young patients with BC to their older counterparts treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) in a regional cancer centre in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yadav, Budhi Singh, Das, Deepak, Bansal, Anshuma, Dahiya, Divya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Via Medica 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9591044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36299397
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0028
_version_ 1784814625358872576
author Yadav, Budhi Singh
Das, Deepak
Bansal, Anshuma
Dahiya, Divya
author_facet Yadav, Budhi Singh
Das, Deepak
Bansal, Anshuma
Dahiya, Divya
author_sort Yadav, Budhi Singh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Young women with breast cancer (BC) are not represented in the trials on hypofractionation. In this study we compared outcomes in young patients with BC to their older counterparts treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) in a regional cancer centre in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1990 to December 2010, women with BC, treated with hypofractionated RT dose of 35–40 Gy/15#/3 weeks were divided into two groups, ≤ 35 years and > 35 years. Outcomes compared were locoregional recurrence rate (LRR), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicities. LRRFS, DFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of total 2244 patients, 359 were ≤ 35 years of age and 1885 were > 35 years. Patient and disease characteristics were comparable between the two groups, except that comorbidities were significantly higher in the > 35 years age group, more patients aged ≤ 35 years had nodal N3 disease, received chemotherapy and RT to internal mammary nodes and more patients in the > 35 years group received hormonal therapy. Median follow up was 10 years (range 1–30 years). LRR and distant metastases were comparable between the two groups. However, synchronous LRR and distant metastases were significantly higher in the ≤ 35 years group 18 (5.1%) as compared to the > 35 years group 39 (2.1%) with p = 0.018. Estimated 10-year LRRFS, DFS and OS were 92% vs. 94% (p = 0.95), 68% vs. 73%(p = 0.058) and 78% vs. 76% (p = 0.10) in ≤ 35 years and > 35 years, respectively. OS for stage 1 was comparable between the two groups. However, for stage 2 and 3 it was 77% vs. 82% (p = 0.048) and 53% vs. 62% (p = 0.045) in the ≤ 35 years and > 35 years group, respectively. Acute and late toxicity were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Young BC patients had higher LRR and distant metastases. LRRFS, DFS and toxicities were comparable between the two groups. However, OS was poorer in young BC patients with stage 2 and 3 disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9591044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Via Medica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95910442022-10-25 Hypofractionated radiotherapy in young versus older women with breast cancer: a retrospective study from India Yadav, Budhi Singh Das, Deepak Bansal, Anshuma Dahiya, Divya Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Research Paper BACKGROUND: Young women with breast cancer (BC) are not represented in the trials on hypofractionation. In this study we compared outcomes in young patients with BC to their older counterparts treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) in a regional cancer centre in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1990 to December 2010, women with BC, treated with hypofractionated RT dose of 35–40 Gy/15#/3 weeks were divided into two groups, ≤ 35 years and > 35 years. Outcomes compared were locoregional recurrence rate (LRR), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicities. LRRFS, DFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of total 2244 patients, 359 were ≤ 35 years of age and 1885 were > 35 years. Patient and disease characteristics were comparable between the two groups, except that comorbidities were significantly higher in the > 35 years age group, more patients aged ≤ 35 years had nodal N3 disease, received chemotherapy and RT to internal mammary nodes and more patients in the > 35 years group received hormonal therapy. Median follow up was 10 years (range 1–30 years). LRR and distant metastases were comparable between the two groups. However, synchronous LRR and distant metastases were significantly higher in the ≤ 35 years group 18 (5.1%) as compared to the > 35 years group 39 (2.1%) with p = 0.018. Estimated 10-year LRRFS, DFS and OS were 92% vs. 94% (p = 0.95), 68% vs. 73%(p = 0.058) and 78% vs. 76% (p = 0.10) in ≤ 35 years and > 35 years, respectively. OS for stage 1 was comparable between the two groups. However, for stage 2 and 3 it was 77% vs. 82% (p = 0.048) and 53% vs. 62% (p = 0.045) in the ≤ 35 years and > 35 years group, respectively. Acute and late toxicity were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Young BC patients had higher LRR and distant metastases. LRRFS, DFS and toxicities were comparable between the two groups. However, OS was poorer in young BC patients with stage 2 and 3 disease. Via Medica 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9591044/ /pubmed/36299397 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0028 Text en © 2022 Greater Poland Cancer Centre https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially
spellingShingle Research Paper
Yadav, Budhi Singh
Das, Deepak
Bansal, Anshuma
Dahiya, Divya
Hypofractionated radiotherapy in young versus older women with breast cancer: a retrospective study from India
title Hypofractionated radiotherapy in young versus older women with breast cancer: a retrospective study from India
title_full Hypofractionated radiotherapy in young versus older women with breast cancer: a retrospective study from India
title_fullStr Hypofractionated radiotherapy in young versus older women with breast cancer: a retrospective study from India
title_full_unstemmed Hypofractionated radiotherapy in young versus older women with breast cancer: a retrospective study from India
title_short Hypofractionated radiotherapy in young versus older women with breast cancer: a retrospective study from India
title_sort hypofractionated radiotherapy in young versus older women with breast cancer: a retrospective study from india
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9591044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36299397
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0028
work_keys_str_mv AT yadavbudhisingh hypofractionatedradiotherapyinyoungversusolderwomenwithbreastcanceraretrospectivestudyfromindia
AT dasdeepak hypofractionatedradiotherapyinyoungversusolderwomenwithbreastcanceraretrospectivestudyfromindia
AT bansalanshuma hypofractionatedradiotherapyinyoungversusolderwomenwithbreastcanceraretrospectivestudyfromindia
AT dahiyadivya hypofractionatedradiotherapyinyoungversusolderwomenwithbreastcanceraretrospectivestudyfromindia