Cargando…

Reduction of opioid use after orthopedic surgery: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: The opioid epidemic is one of the biggest public health crises of our time, and overprescribing of opioids after surgery has the potential to lead to long-term use. The purpose of this review was to identify and summarize the available evidence on interventions aimed at reducing opioid u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gormley, Jessica, Gouveia, Kyle, Sakha, Seaher, Stewart, Veronica, Emmanuel, Ushwin, Shehata, Michael, Tushinski, Daniel, Shanthanna, Harsha, Madden, Kim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CMA Impact Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9592092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36265899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.023620
_version_ 1784814845490626560
author Gormley, Jessica
Gouveia, Kyle
Sakha, Seaher
Stewart, Veronica
Emmanuel, Ushwin
Shehata, Michael
Tushinski, Daniel
Shanthanna, Harsha
Madden, Kim
author_facet Gormley, Jessica
Gouveia, Kyle
Sakha, Seaher
Stewart, Veronica
Emmanuel, Ushwin
Shehata, Michael
Tushinski, Daniel
Shanthanna, Harsha
Madden, Kim
author_sort Gormley, Jessica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The opioid epidemic is one of the biggest public health crises of our time, and overprescribing of opioids after surgery has the potential to lead to long-term use. The purpose of this review was to identify and summarize the available evidence on interventions aimed at reducing opioid use after orthopedic surgery. METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, Embase and Medline from inception until August 2019 for studies comparing interventions aimed at reducing opioid use after orthopedic surgery to a control group. We recorded demographic data and data on intervention success, and recorded or calculated percent opioid reduction compared to control. RESULTS: We included 141 studies (20 963 patients) in the review, of which 113 (80.1%) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 6 (4.3%) were prospective cohort studies, 16 (11.4%) were retrospective cohort studies, 5 (3.6%) were case reports, and 1 (0.7%) was a case series. The majority of studies (95 [67.4%]) had a follow-up duration of 2 days or less. Interventions included the use of local anesthetics and/or nerve blocks (42 studies [29.8%]), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (31 [22.0%]), neuropathic pain medications (9 [6.4%]) and multimodal analgesic combinations (25 [17.7%]. In 127 studies (90.1%), a significant decrease in postoperative opioid consumption compared to the control intervention was reported; the median opioid reduction in these studies was 39.7% (range 5%–100%). Despite these reductions in opioid use, the effect on pain scores and on incidence of adverse effects was inconsistent. CONCLUSION: There is a large body of evidence from randomized trials showing the promise of a variety of interventions for reducing opioid use after orthopedic surgery. Rigorously designed RCTs are needed to determine the ideal interventions or combination of interventions for reducing opioid use, for the good of patients, medicine and society.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9592092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher CMA Impact Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95920922022-10-28 Reduction of opioid use after orthopedic surgery: a scoping review Gormley, Jessica Gouveia, Kyle Sakha, Seaher Stewart, Veronica Emmanuel, Ushwin Shehata, Michael Tushinski, Daniel Shanthanna, Harsha Madden, Kim Can J Surg Review BACKGROUND: The opioid epidemic is one of the biggest public health crises of our time, and overprescribing of opioids after surgery has the potential to lead to long-term use. The purpose of this review was to identify and summarize the available evidence on interventions aimed at reducing opioid use after orthopedic surgery. METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, Embase and Medline from inception until August 2019 for studies comparing interventions aimed at reducing opioid use after orthopedic surgery to a control group. We recorded demographic data and data on intervention success, and recorded or calculated percent opioid reduction compared to control. RESULTS: We included 141 studies (20 963 patients) in the review, of which 113 (80.1%) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 6 (4.3%) were prospective cohort studies, 16 (11.4%) were retrospective cohort studies, 5 (3.6%) were case reports, and 1 (0.7%) was a case series. The majority of studies (95 [67.4%]) had a follow-up duration of 2 days or less. Interventions included the use of local anesthetics and/or nerve blocks (42 studies [29.8%]), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (31 [22.0%]), neuropathic pain medications (9 [6.4%]) and multimodal analgesic combinations (25 [17.7%]. In 127 studies (90.1%), a significant decrease in postoperative opioid consumption compared to the control intervention was reported; the median opioid reduction in these studies was 39.7% (range 5%–100%). Despite these reductions in opioid use, the effect on pain scores and on incidence of adverse effects was inconsistent. CONCLUSION: There is a large body of evidence from randomized trials showing the promise of a variety of interventions for reducing opioid use after orthopedic surgery. Rigorously designed RCTs are needed to determine the ideal interventions or combination of interventions for reducing opioid use, for the good of patients, medicine and society. CMA Impact Inc. 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9592092/ /pubmed/36265899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.023620 Text en © 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Review
Gormley, Jessica
Gouveia, Kyle
Sakha, Seaher
Stewart, Veronica
Emmanuel, Ushwin
Shehata, Michael
Tushinski, Daniel
Shanthanna, Harsha
Madden, Kim
Reduction of opioid use after orthopedic surgery: a scoping review
title Reduction of opioid use after orthopedic surgery: a scoping review
title_full Reduction of opioid use after orthopedic surgery: a scoping review
title_fullStr Reduction of opioid use after orthopedic surgery: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Reduction of opioid use after orthopedic surgery: a scoping review
title_short Reduction of opioid use after orthopedic surgery: a scoping review
title_sort reduction of opioid use after orthopedic surgery: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9592092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36265899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.023620
work_keys_str_mv AT gormleyjessica reductionofopioiduseafterorthopedicsurgeryascopingreview
AT gouveiakyle reductionofopioiduseafterorthopedicsurgeryascopingreview
AT sakhaseaher reductionofopioiduseafterorthopedicsurgeryascopingreview
AT stewartveronica reductionofopioiduseafterorthopedicsurgeryascopingreview
AT emmanuelushwin reductionofopioiduseafterorthopedicsurgeryascopingreview
AT shehatamichael reductionofopioiduseafterorthopedicsurgeryascopingreview
AT tushinskidaniel reductionofopioiduseafterorthopedicsurgeryascopingreview
AT shanthannaharsha reductionofopioiduseafterorthopedicsurgeryascopingreview
AT maddenkim reductionofopioiduseafterorthopedicsurgeryascopingreview