Cargando…
Procedure Time and Students' Perception Comparing Full Arch Digital Scans with Conventional Impressions: A Cross-Over Randomized Experimental Trial
METHODS: Ninety-six dental students each prepared tooth #36 for an all-ceramic crown on typodont models and were then randomly assigned into either group A: performed digital scan first, or Group B: performed conventional impression first. Procedure time was recorded for both. Immediately following...
Autores principales: | Alfallaj, Hayam A., Alsaloum, Mohammed A., Altuwaijri, Sahr H., Aldibasi, Omar S., Alkadi, Lubna T. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9592231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36299404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6320251 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Full-Arch Impressions in Patients: An Update
por: Schmidt, Alexander, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Evaluation of Intraoral Full-Arch Scan versus Conventional Preliminary Impression
por: Jánosi, Kinga Mária, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
In Vitro Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Impressions for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses
por: D’haese, Rani, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Methods of Obtaining Full-Arch Dental Impression (In Vitro Study)
por: Husein, Hassan A, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Impressions for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses: An In Vitro Study
por: Drancourt, Noemie, et al.
Publicado: (2023)