Cargando…

Comparison of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and ultrasound in staging of patients with malignant melanoma

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of 2-18fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) and ultrasound (US) for staging patients with malignant melanoma. METHODS: In total, 258 patients (112 men and 146 women; mean age, 61 ± 16years) met the pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weber, Philipp, Arnold, Andreas, Hohmann, Joachim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9592435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36281128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031092
_version_ 1784814926306476032
author Weber, Philipp
Arnold, Andreas
Hohmann, Joachim
author_facet Weber, Philipp
Arnold, Andreas
Hohmann, Joachim
author_sort Weber, Philipp
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of 2-18fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) and ultrasound (US) for staging patients with malignant melanoma. METHODS: In total, 258 patients (112 men and 146 women; mean age, 61 ± 16years) met the primary inclusion criteria for malignant melanoma without further malignancy proven by histopathology. This was a retrospective study of the diagnostic accuracy. All data were obtained from the hospital’s patient and radiology information system. Patients formed a consecutive series and were examined by 18F-FDG PET/CT and 176 additionally by US (US as a whole [wUS], peripheral lymph nodes [pUS], abdomen [aUS]), with a total of 584 (18)F-FDG PET/CT and 697 US. (18)F-FDG PET/CT and US revealed 824 and 726 lesions, respectively. Per-patient, per-examination, and per-lesion analyses were also performed. The reference standards used were histopathology or resection of lesions, and follow-up controls using other imaging methods. RESULTS: Significant differences (P < .05) were found in the per-examination for the sensitivity of (18)F-FDG PET/CT (0.80) compared to wUS (0.63) and pUS (0.61), and the specificity of (18)F-FDG PET/CT (0.96) compared to wUS (0.98) and aUS (0.99). In the PLA, there were significant differences in sensitivity and specificity for (18)F-FDG PET/CT (0.83, 0.91) compared to wUS (0.61, 0.98), pUS (0.60, 0.98), and aUS (0.61, 0.99). CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET/CT is preferable to US for detecting both lymph node and abdominal metastases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9592435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95924352022-10-25 Comparison of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and ultrasound in staging of patients with malignant melanoma Weber, Philipp Arnold, Andreas Hohmann, Joachim Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of 2-18fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) and ultrasound (US) for staging patients with malignant melanoma. METHODS: In total, 258 patients (112 men and 146 women; mean age, 61 ± 16years) met the primary inclusion criteria for malignant melanoma without further malignancy proven by histopathology. This was a retrospective study of the diagnostic accuracy. All data were obtained from the hospital’s patient and radiology information system. Patients formed a consecutive series and were examined by 18F-FDG PET/CT and 176 additionally by US (US as a whole [wUS], peripheral lymph nodes [pUS], abdomen [aUS]), with a total of 584 (18)F-FDG PET/CT and 697 US. (18)F-FDG PET/CT and US revealed 824 and 726 lesions, respectively. Per-patient, per-examination, and per-lesion analyses were also performed. The reference standards used were histopathology or resection of lesions, and follow-up controls using other imaging methods. RESULTS: Significant differences (P < .05) were found in the per-examination for the sensitivity of (18)F-FDG PET/CT (0.80) compared to wUS (0.63) and pUS (0.61), and the specificity of (18)F-FDG PET/CT (0.96) compared to wUS (0.98) and aUS (0.99). In the PLA, there were significant differences in sensitivity and specificity for (18)F-FDG PET/CT (0.83, 0.91) compared to wUS (0.61, 0.98), pUS (0.60, 0.98), and aUS (0.61, 0.99). CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET/CT is preferable to US for detecting both lymph node and abdominal metastases. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9592435/ /pubmed/36281128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031092 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Research Article
Weber, Philipp
Arnold, Andreas
Hohmann, Joachim
Comparison of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and ultrasound in staging of patients with malignant melanoma
title Comparison of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and ultrasound in staging of patients with malignant melanoma
title_full Comparison of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and ultrasound in staging of patients with malignant melanoma
title_fullStr Comparison of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and ultrasound in staging of patients with malignant melanoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and ultrasound in staging of patients with malignant melanoma
title_short Comparison of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and ultrasound in staging of patients with malignant melanoma
title_sort comparison of (18)f-fdg pet/ct and ultrasound in staging of patients with malignant melanoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9592435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36281128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031092
work_keys_str_mv AT weberphilipp comparisonof18ffdgpetctandultrasoundinstagingofpatientswithmalignantmelanoma
AT arnoldandreas comparisonof18ffdgpetctandultrasoundinstagingofpatientswithmalignantmelanoma
AT hohmannjoachim comparisonof18ffdgpetctandultrasoundinstagingofpatientswithmalignantmelanoma