Cargando…
A Proposed Classification and Treatment Algorithm for Rectus Diastasis: A Prospective Study
BACKGROUND: This study presents a classification system and treatment method to correct Rectus diastasis (RD) during abdominoplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixty seven patients undergoing abdominoplasty were enrolled between April 2014 and January 2018. Forty-three patients did not p...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9592666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35043248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02739-w |
_version_ | 1784814980653121536 |
---|---|
author | Keramidas, Evangelos Rodopoulou, Stavroula Gavala, Maria-Ioanna |
author_facet | Keramidas, Evangelos Rodopoulou, Stavroula Gavala, Maria-Ioanna |
author_sort | Keramidas, Evangelos |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study presents a classification system and treatment method to correct Rectus diastasis (RD) during abdominoplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixty seven patients undergoing abdominoplasty were enrolled between April 2014 and January 2018. Forty-three patients did not present with RD and were excluded from the analysis. Mean age was 40.32 years, mean BMI was 23.84, and minimum follow-up was 24 months. A four-type (A: mild 2–3cm, B: moderate 3–5cm, C: severe 5–7cm, and D: very severe 7–9cm) classification system is described. A different treatment method is performed in each category using continuous and interrupted absorbable sutures. Postoperatively patients filled up a questionnaire that involved the level of pain, the postoperative day they performed specific indoor/outdoor activities, and the evaluation of the aesthetic result. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between the four RD types regarding pain, complications, and return to specific activities. All types of RD had the same low rate complication profile. The seroma rate was 0.81%. The infection rate was 0.81%, and the thromboembolism and the pneumonic embolism rate was 0%. After 2–6 years of follow-up no clinical recurrence of rectus diastasis was observed. All reoperations (14.52%) were performed due to scar deformities. Mean pain score levels were very low (<1.5) and within a week most patients returned to specific indoor and outdoor activities. Most patients were extremely satisfied with the results. CONCLUSIONS: In this article, we present an updated classification system and treatment protocol to provide surgeons a safe and standardized method that produces high-quality aesthetic results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00266-021-02739-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9592666 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95926662022-10-26 A Proposed Classification and Treatment Algorithm for Rectus Diastasis: A Prospective Study Keramidas, Evangelos Rodopoulou, Stavroula Gavala, Maria-Ioanna Aesthetic Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: This study presents a classification system and treatment method to correct Rectus diastasis (RD) during abdominoplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixty seven patients undergoing abdominoplasty were enrolled between April 2014 and January 2018. Forty-three patients did not present with RD and were excluded from the analysis. Mean age was 40.32 years, mean BMI was 23.84, and minimum follow-up was 24 months. A four-type (A: mild 2–3cm, B: moderate 3–5cm, C: severe 5–7cm, and D: very severe 7–9cm) classification system is described. A different treatment method is performed in each category using continuous and interrupted absorbable sutures. Postoperatively patients filled up a questionnaire that involved the level of pain, the postoperative day they performed specific indoor/outdoor activities, and the evaluation of the aesthetic result. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between the four RD types regarding pain, complications, and return to specific activities. All types of RD had the same low rate complication profile. The seroma rate was 0.81%. The infection rate was 0.81%, and the thromboembolism and the pneumonic embolism rate was 0%. After 2–6 years of follow-up no clinical recurrence of rectus diastasis was observed. All reoperations (14.52%) were performed due to scar deformities. Mean pain score levels were very low (<1.5) and within a week most patients returned to specific indoor and outdoor activities. Most patients were extremely satisfied with the results. CONCLUSIONS: In this article, we present an updated classification system and treatment protocol to provide surgeons a safe and standardized method that produces high-quality aesthetic results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00266-021-02739-w. Springer US 2022-01-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9592666/ /pubmed/35043248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02739-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Keramidas, Evangelos Rodopoulou, Stavroula Gavala, Maria-Ioanna A Proposed Classification and Treatment Algorithm for Rectus Diastasis: A Prospective Study |
title | A Proposed Classification and Treatment Algorithm for Rectus Diastasis: A Prospective Study |
title_full | A Proposed Classification and Treatment Algorithm for Rectus Diastasis: A Prospective Study |
title_fullStr | A Proposed Classification and Treatment Algorithm for Rectus Diastasis: A Prospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Proposed Classification and Treatment Algorithm for Rectus Diastasis: A Prospective Study |
title_short | A Proposed Classification and Treatment Algorithm for Rectus Diastasis: A Prospective Study |
title_sort | proposed classification and treatment algorithm for rectus diastasis: a prospective study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9592666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35043248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02739-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keramidasevangelos aproposedclassificationandtreatmentalgorithmforrectusdiastasisaprospectivestudy AT rodopouloustavroula aproposedclassificationandtreatmentalgorithmforrectusdiastasisaprospectivestudy AT gavalamariaioanna aproposedclassificationandtreatmentalgorithmforrectusdiastasisaprospectivestudy AT keramidasevangelos proposedclassificationandtreatmentalgorithmforrectusdiastasisaprospectivestudy AT rodopouloustavroula proposedclassificationandtreatmentalgorithmforrectusdiastasisaprospectivestudy AT gavalamariaioanna proposedclassificationandtreatmentalgorithmforrectusdiastasisaprospectivestudy |