Cargando…

Effects of acoustic stimulation intensity on air-conducted vestibular evoked myogenic potential in children

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of acoustic stimulation intensity on ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP and cVEMP) responses elicited by air-conducted sound (ACS) in healthy children. METHODS: Thirteen healthy children aged 4–10 years and 20 healthy adults aged 20-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao, Qianwen, Zhang, Qin, Wu, Qiong, Shen, Jiali, Wang, Lu, Chen, Yanfei, Lv, Jingrong, Yang, Jun, Jin, Yulian, Zhang, Qing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9592712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36303562
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.996246
_version_ 1784814988973572096
author Xiao, Qianwen
Zhang, Qin
Wu, Qiong
Shen, Jiali
Wang, Lu
Chen, Yanfei
Lv, Jingrong
Yang, Jun
Jin, Yulian
Zhang, Qing
author_facet Xiao, Qianwen
Zhang, Qin
Wu, Qiong
Shen, Jiali
Wang, Lu
Chen, Yanfei
Lv, Jingrong
Yang, Jun
Jin, Yulian
Zhang, Qing
author_sort Xiao, Qianwen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of acoustic stimulation intensity on ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP and cVEMP) responses elicited by air-conducted sound (ACS) in healthy children. METHODS: Thirteen healthy children aged 4–10 years and 20 healthy adults aged 20-40 years with normal hearing and tympanometry were enrolled in this study. All subjects received oVEMP and cVEMP tests under different acoustic stimulation intensities (131, 126, 121, 116, 111 and 106 dB SPL). Mean n1 latency, p1 latency, interpeak latency, amplitude and response rate were investigated and analyzed. RESULTS: As the acoustic stimulation intensity decreased, for oVEMP, the response rate of children decreased from 100% (131, 126 and 121 dB SPL) to 57.69% (116 dB SPL), 26.92% (111 dB SPL) and 11.54% (106 dB SPL). The response rate of adults decreased from 100% (131 and 126 dB SPL) to 95% (121 dB SPL), 55% (116 dB SPL), 12.5% (111 dB SPL) and 2.5% (106 dB SPL). There were lower n1 latency, p1 latency and higher amplitude in children when comparing by acoustic stimulation intensities (p < 0.05). Regarding cVEMP, the response rate of children decreased from 100% (131, 126 and 121 dB SPL) to 88.46% (116 dB SPL), 53.85% (111 dB SPL) and 26.92% (106 dB SPL). The response rate of adults decreased from 100% (131 and 126 dB SPL) to 95% (121 dB SPL), 85% (116 dB SPL), 37.5% (111 dB SPL) and 7.5% (106 dB SPL). A statistically significant difference was found in amplitude at different acoustic stimulation intensities in both children and adults (p < 0.05). When stimulated by 131 dB SPL acoustic stimulation, there were lower n1 latency, p1 latency and higher amplitude in children in oVEMP and cVEMP compared with adults (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The response rate and amplitude of oVEMP and cVEMP in children and adults presented significant differences with a decrease in acoustic stimulation intensity. In this study, using 121 dB SPL for children and 126 dB SPL for adults during VEMP test could be regarded as safer stimulation intensities and thus reduced sound exposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9592712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95927122022-10-26 Effects of acoustic stimulation intensity on air-conducted vestibular evoked myogenic potential in children Xiao, Qianwen Zhang, Qin Wu, Qiong Shen, Jiali Wang, Lu Chen, Yanfei Lv, Jingrong Yang, Jun Jin, Yulian Zhang, Qing Front Neurol Neurology OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of acoustic stimulation intensity on ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP and cVEMP) responses elicited by air-conducted sound (ACS) in healthy children. METHODS: Thirteen healthy children aged 4–10 years and 20 healthy adults aged 20-40 years with normal hearing and tympanometry were enrolled in this study. All subjects received oVEMP and cVEMP tests under different acoustic stimulation intensities (131, 126, 121, 116, 111 and 106 dB SPL). Mean n1 latency, p1 latency, interpeak latency, amplitude and response rate were investigated and analyzed. RESULTS: As the acoustic stimulation intensity decreased, for oVEMP, the response rate of children decreased from 100% (131, 126 and 121 dB SPL) to 57.69% (116 dB SPL), 26.92% (111 dB SPL) and 11.54% (106 dB SPL). The response rate of adults decreased from 100% (131 and 126 dB SPL) to 95% (121 dB SPL), 55% (116 dB SPL), 12.5% (111 dB SPL) and 2.5% (106 dB SPL). There were lower n1 latency, p1 latency and higher amplitude in children when comparing by acoustic stimulation intensities (p < 0.05). Regarding cVEMP, the response rate of children decreased from 100% (131, 126 and 121 dB SPL) to 88.46% (116 dB SPL), 53.85% (111 dB SPL) and 26.92% (106 dB SPL). The response rate of adults decreased from 100% (131 and 126 dB SPL) to 95% (121 dB SPL), 85% (116 dB SPL), 37.5% (111 dB SPL) and 7.5% (106 dB SPL). A statistically significant difference was found in amplitude at different acoustic stimulation intensities in both children and adults (p < 0.05). When stimulated by 131 dB SPL acoustic stimulation, there were lower n1 latency, p1 latency and higher amplitude in children in oVEMP and cVEMP compared with adults (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The response rate and amplitude of oVEMP and cVEMP in children and adults presented significant differences with a decrease in acoustic stimulation intensity. In this study, using 121 dB SPL for children and 126 dB SPL for adults during VEMP test could be regarded as safer stimulation intensities and thus reduced sound exposure. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9592712/ /pubmed/36303562 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.996246 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xiao, Zhang, Wu, Shen, Wang, Chen, Lv, Yang, Jin and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Xiao, Qianwen
Zhang, Qin
Wu, Qiong
Shen, Jiali
Wang, Lu
Chen, Yanfei
Lv, Jingrong
Yang, Jun
Jin, Yulian
Zhang, Qing
Effects of acoustic stimulation intensity on air-conducted vestibular evoked myogenic potential in children
title Effects of acoustic stimulation intensity on air-conducted vestibular evoked myogenic potential in children
title_full Effects of acoustic stimulation intensity on air-conducted vestibular evoked myogenic potential in children
title_fullStr Effects of acoustic stimulation intensity on air-conducted vestibular evoked myogenic potential in children
title_full_unstemmed Effects of acoustic stimulation intensity on air-conducted vestibular evoked myogenic potential in children
title_short Effects of acoustic stimulation intensity on air-conducted vestibular evoked myogenic potential in children
title_sort effects of acoustic stimulation intensity on air-conducted vestibular evoked myogenic potential in children
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9592712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36303562
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.996246
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoqianwen effectsofacousticstimulationintensityonairconductedvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialinchildren
AT zhangqin effectsofacousticstimulationintensityonairconductedvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialinchildren
AT wuqiong effectsofacousticstimulationintensityonairconductedvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialinchildren
AT shenjiali effectsofacousticstimulationintensityonairconductedvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialinchildren
AT wanglu effectsofacousticstimulationintensityonairconductedvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialinchildren
AT chenyanfei effectsofacousticstimulationintensityonairconductedvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialinchildren
AT lvjingrong effectsofacousticstimulationintensityonairconductedvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialinchildren
AT yangjun effectsofacousticstimulationintensityonairconductedvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialinchildren
AT jinyulian effectsofacousticstimulationintensityonairconductedvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialinchildren
AT zhangqing effectsofacousticstimulationintensityonairconductedvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialinchildren