Cargando…
Comparative study on consumers’ choice behaviors in selecting pork in rational and irrational scenarios
To better understand the purchasing decision-making process of humane pork, and examine the internal relationship between consumers’ preferences in rational consumption and irrational decoy scenarios, 405 consumers in Wuxi City, Jiangsu Province, and China were surveyed. Attributes were set for bree...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9592719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36304864 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1016933 |
_version_ | 1784814990812774400 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Lingling Yu, Meidan Chen, Xiujuan |
author_facet | Xu, Lingling Yu, Meidan Chen, Xiujuan |
author_sort | Xu, Lingling |
collection | PubMed |
description | To better understand the purchasing decision-making process of humane pork, and examine the internal relationship between consumers’ preferences in rational consumption and irrational decoy scenarios, 405 consumers in Wuxi City, Jiangsu Province, and China were surveyed. Attributes were set for breeding time, breeding mode, diet cleanliness label, and price, and the first three among them reflect animal welfare conditions. The results show that in the rational consumption scenarios, consumers pay the most attention to the price attribute, followed by the attribute of diet cleanliness label, breeding mode, and breeding time. In the irrational decoy scenarios, consumers are most likely to be affected by the attribute decoy of diet cleanliness label, which have the utility of avoiding food safety risks. In addition, the decoy effect triggered by the price attribute which owned the highest degree of rational preference among consumers is also substantially higher, but lower than that of the diet cleanliness label attribute. The decoy effect caused by the breeding time attribute with the lowest degree of consumers’ rational preference is also the lowest. Therefore, the government should strengthen the publicity of the humane treatment of pigs before slaughter, and improve the certification and management system of pigs’ diet cleanliness. Besides, marketers are suggested to emphasis the product attributes that customer’s value the most in their advertising. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9592719 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95927192022-10-26 Comparative study on consumers’ choice behaviors in selecting pork in rational and irrational scenarios Xu, Lingling Yu, Meidan Chen, Xiujuan Front Psychol Psychology To better understand the purchasing decision-making process of humane pork, and examine the internal relationship between consumers’ preferences in rational consumption and irrational decoy scenarios, 405 consumers in Wuxi City, Jiangsu Province, and China were surveyed. Attributes were set for breeding time, breeding mode, diet cleanliness label, and price, and the first three among them reflect animal welfare conditions. The results show that in the rational consumption scenarios, consumers pay the most attention to the price attribute, followed by the attribute of diet cleanliness label, breeding mode, and breeding time. In the irrational decoy scenarios, consumers are most likely to be affected by the attribute decoy of diet cleanliness label, which have the utility of avoiding food safety risks. In addition, the decoy effect triggered by the price attribute which owned the highest degree of rational preference among consumers is also substantially higher, but lower than that of the diet cleanliness label attribute. The decoy effect caused by the breeding time attribute with the lowest degree of consumers’ rational preference is also the lowest. Therefore, the government should strengthen the publicity of the humane treatment of pigs before slaughter, and improve the certification and management system of pigs’ diet cleanliness. Besides, marketers are suggested to emphasis the product attributes that customer’s value the most in their advertising. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9592719/ /pubmed/36304864 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1016933 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xu, Yu and Chen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Xu, Lingling Yu, Meidan Chen, Xiujuan Comparative study on consumers’ choice behaviors in selecting pork in rational and irrational scenarios |
title | Comparative study on consumers’ choice behaviors in selecting pork in rational and irrational scenarios |
title_full | Comparative study on consumers’ choice behaviors in selecting pork in rational and irrational scenarios |
title_fullStr | Comparative study on consumers’ choice behaviors in selecting pork in rational and irrational scenarios |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative study on consumers’ choice behaviors in selecting pork in rational and irrational scenarios |
title_short | Comparative study on consumers’ choice behaviors in selecting pork in rational and irrational scenarios |
title_sort | comparative study on consumers’ choice behaviors in selecting pork in rational and irrational scenarios |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9592719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36304864 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1016933 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xulingling comparativestudyonconsumerschoicebehaviorsinselectingporkinrationalandirrationalscenarios AT yumeidan comparativestudyonconsumerschoicebehaviorsinselectingporkinrationalandirrationalscenarios AT chenxiujuan comparativestudyonconsumerschoicebehaviorsinselectingporkinrationalandirrationalscenarios |