Cargando…
Chest radiograph classification and severity of suspected COVID-19 by different radiologist groups and attending clinicians: multi-reader, multi-case study
OBJECTIVES: To quantify reader agreement for the British Society of Thoracic Imaging (BSTI) diagnostic and severity classification for COVID-19 on chest radiographs (CXR), in particular agreement for an indeterminate CXR that could instigate CT imaging, from single and paired images. METHODS: Twenty...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9592875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36282308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09172-w |
_version_ | 1784815028376961024 |
---|---|
author | Nair, Arjun Procter, Alexander Halligan, Steve Parry, Thomas Ahmed, Asia Duncan, Mark Taylor, Magali Chouhan, Manil Gaunt, Trevor Roberts, James van Vucht, Niels Campbell, Alan Davis, Laura May Jacob, Joseph Hubbard, Rachel Kumar, Shankar Said, Ammaarah Chan, Xinhui Cutfield, Tim Luintel, Akish Marks, Michael Stone, Neil Mallet, Sue |
author_facet | Nair, Arjun Procter, Alexander Halligan, Steve Parry, Thomas Ahmed, Asia Duncan, Mark Taylor, Magali Chouhan, Manil Gaunt, Trevor Roberts, James van Vucht, Niels Campbell, Alan Davis, Laura May Jacob, Joseph Hubbard, Rachel Kumar, Shankar Said, Ammaarah Chan, Xinhui Cutfield, Tim Luintel, Akish Marks, Michael Stone, Neil Mallet, Sue |
author_sort | Nair, Arjun |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To quantify reader agreement for the British Society of Thoracic Imaging (BSTI) diagnostic and severity classification for COVID-19 on chest radiographs (CXR), in particular agreement for an indeterminate CXR that could instigate CT imaging, from single and paired images. METHODS: Twenty readers (four groups of five individuals)—consultant chest (CCR), general consultant (GCR), and specialist registrar (RSR) radiologists, and infectious diseases clinicians (IDR)—assigned BSTI categories and severity in addition to modified Covid-Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema Score (Covid-RALES), to 305 CXRs (129 paired; 2 time points) from 176 guideline-defined COVID-19 patients. Percentage agreement with a consensus of two chest radiologists was calculated for (1) categorisation to those needing CT (indeterminate) versus those that did not (classic/probable, non-COVID-19); (2) severity; and (3) severity change on paired CXRs using the two scoring systems. RESULTS: Agreement with consensus for the indeterminate category was low across all groups (28–37%). Agreement for other BSTI categories was highest for classic/probable for the other three reader groups (66–76%) compared to GCR (49%). Agreement for normal was similar across all radiologists (54–61%) but lower for IDR (31%). Agreement for a severe CXR was lower for GCR (65%), compared to the other three reader groups (84–95%). For all groups, agreement for changes across paired CXRs was modest. CONCLUSION: Agreement for the indeterminate BSTI COVID-19 CXR category is low, and generally moderate for the other BSTI categories and for severity change, suggesting that the test, rather than readers, is limited in utility for both deciding disposition and serial monitoring. KEY POINTS: • Across different reader groups, agreement for COVID-19 diagnostic categorisation on CXR varies widely. • Agreement varies to a degree that may render CXR alone ineffective for triage, especially for indeterminate cases. • Agreement for serial CXR change is moderate, limiting utility in guiding management. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-09172-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9592875 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95928752022-10-25 Chest radiograph classification and severity of suspected COVID-19 by different radiologist groups and attending clinicians: multi-reader, multi-case study Nair, Arjun Procter, Alexander Halligan, Steve Parry, Thomas Ahmed, Asia Duncan, Mark Taylor, Magali Chouhan, Manil Gaunt, Trevor Roberts, James van Vucht, Niels Campbell, Alan Davis, Laura May Jacob, Joseph Hubbard, Rachel Kumar, Shankar Said, Ammaarah Chan, Xinhui Cutfield, Tim Luintel, Akish Marks, Michael Stone, Neil Mallet, Sue Eur Radiol Chest OBJECTIVES: To quantify reader agreement for the British Society of Thoracic Imaging (BSTI) diagnostic and severity classification for COVID-19 on chest radiographs (CXR), in particular agreement for an indeterminate CXR that could instigate CT imaging, from single and paired images. METHODS: Twenty readers (four groups of five individuals)—consultant chest (CCR), general consultant (GCR), and specialist registrar (RSR) radiologists, and infectious diseases clinicians (IDR)—assigned BSTI categories and severity in addition to modified Covid-Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema Score (Covid-RALES), to 305 CXRs (129 paired; 2 time points) from 176 guideline-defined COVID-19 patients. Percentage agreement with a consensus of two chest radiologists was calculated for (1) categorisation to those needing CT (indeterminate) versus those that did not (classic/probable, non-COVID-19); (2) severity; and (3) severity change on paired CXRs using the two scoring systems. RESULTS: Agreement with consensus for the indeterminate category was low across all groups (28–37%). Agreement for other BSTI categories was highest for classic/probable for the other three reader groups (66–76%) compared to GCR (49%). Agreement for normal was similar across all radiologists (54–61%) but lower for IDR (31%). Agreement for a severe CXR was lower for GCR (65%), compared to the other three reader groups (84–95%). For all groups, agreement for changes across paired CXRs was modest. CONCLUSION: Agreement for the indeterminate BSTI COVID-19 CXR category is low, and generally moderate for the other BSTI categories and for severity change, suggesting that the test, rather than readers, is limited in utility for both deciding disposition and serial monitoring. KEY POINTS: • Across different reader groups, agreement for COVID-19 diagnostic categorisation on CXR varies widely. • Agreement varies to a degree that may render CXR alone ineffective for triage, especially for indeterminate cases. • Agreement for serial CXR change is moderate, limiting utility in guiding management. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-09172-w. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-10-25 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9592875/ /pubmed/36282308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09172-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Chest Nair, Arjun Procter, Alexander Halligan, Steve Parry, Thomas Ahmed, Asia Duncan, Mark Taylor, Magali Chouhan, Manil Gaunt, Trevor Roberts, James van Vucht, Niels Campbell, Alan Davis, Laura May Jacob, Joseph Hubbard, Rachel Kumar, Shankar Said, Ammaarah Chan, Xinhui Cutfield, Tim Luintel, Akish Marks, Michael Stone, Neil Mallet, Sue Chest radiograph classification and severity of suspected COVID-19 by different radiologist groups and attending clinicians: multi-reader, multi-case study |
title | Chest radiograph classification and severity of suspected COVID-19 by different radiologist groups and attending clinicians: multi-reader, multi-case study |
title_full | Chest radiograph classification and severity of suspected COVID-19 by different radiologist groups and attending clinicians: multi-reader, multi-case study |
title_fullStr | Chest radiograph classification and severity of suspected COVID-19 by different radiologist groups and attending clinicians: multi-reader, multi-case study |
title_full_unstemmed | Chest radiograph classification and severity of suspected COVID-19 by different radiologist groups and attending clinicians: multi-reader, multi-case study |
title_short | Chest radiograph classification and severity of suspected COVID-19 by different radiologist groups and attending clinicians: multi-reader, multi-case study |
title_sort | chest radiograph classification and severity of suspected covid-19 by different radiologist groups and attending clinicians: multi-reader, multi-case study |
topic | Chest |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9592875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36282308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09172-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nairarjun chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy AT procteralexander chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy AT halligansteve chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy AT parrythomas chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy AT ahmedasia chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy AT duncanmark chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy AT taylormagali chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy AT chouhanmanil chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy AT gaunttrevor chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy AT robertsjames chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy AT vanvuchtniels chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy AT campbellalan chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy AT davislauramay chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy AT jacobjoseph chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy AT hubbardrachel chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy AT kumarshankar chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy AT saidammaarah chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy AT chanxinhui chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy AT cutfieldtim chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy AT luintelakish chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy AT marksmichael chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy AT stoneneil chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy AT malletsue chestradiographclassificationandseverityofsuspectedcovid19bydifferentradiologistgroupsandattendingcliniciansmultireadermulticasestudy |