Cargando…

Can prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy Reduce Wound Complications After Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) is associated with a high complication rate. Retrospective studies suggest that incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) might reduce complications, especially seroma, following ILND. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter, randomized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jørgensen, Mads Gustaf, Chakera, Annette Hougaard, Hölmich, Lisbet Rosenkrantz, Drejøe, Jennifer Berg, Andersen, Pia Cajsa Leth, Khorasani, Hoda, Toyserkani, Navid Mohamadpour, Thomsen, Jørn Bo, Sørensen, Jens Ahm
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36304071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2022.08.003
_version_ 1784815123156697088
author Jørgensen, Mads Gustaf
Chakera, Annette Hougaard
Hölmich, Lisbet Rosenkrantz
Drejøe, Jennifer Berg
Andersen, Pia Cajsa Leth
Khorasani, Hoda
Toyserkani, Navid Mohamadpour
Thomsen, Jørn Bo
Sørensen, Jens Ahm
author_facet Jørgensen, Mads Gustaf
Chakera, Annette Hougaard
Hölmich, Lisbet Rosenkrantz
Drejøe, Jennifer Berg
Andersen, Pia Cajsa Leth
Khorasani, Hoda
Toyserkani, Navid Mohamadpour
Thomsen, Jørn Bo
Sørensen, Jens Ahm
author_sort Jørgensen, Mads Gustaf
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) is associated with a high complication rate. Retrospective studies suggest that incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) might reduce complications, especially seroma, following ILND. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter, randomized (1:1), open-labeled, parallel-group trial. Patients with macrometastic melanoma to the inguinal lymph nodes and eligible for ILND were randomized to receive either iNPWT for 14 postoperative days or conventional wound dressing. The primary outcome was seroma incidence. Secondary outcomes included surgical-site infection, wound rupture, wound necrosis, hematoma, rehospitalization and readmission rates between groups. All outcomes were registered 3 months after ILND and analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: The trial was terminated early due to a low recruitment rate as a consequence of a change in the national treatment protocol, and the estimated sample size was not reached. Twenty patients were included and randomized in the study. The trial showed less seroma formation between the iNPWT 6/11 (55%) and control 7/9 (78%) groups; however, this was not statistically significant (p = 0.29). Similarly, there were no differences in the rates of surgical-site infection (p = 0.63), wound rupture (p = 0.19), wound necrosis (p = 0.82), hematoma (p = 0.19), reoperation (p = 0.82) or readmission (p = 0.34) between groups. CONCLUSION: There was a tendency toward fewer complications in the iNPWT group, however this trial was underpowered and could not confirm the hypothesis that iNPWT reduces complications after ILND. Future randomized controlled trials are required to fully evaluate the treatment potential of iNPWT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was prospectively registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03433937.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9593268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95932682022-10-26 Can prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy Reduce Wound Complications After Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial Jørgensen, Mads Gustaf Chakera, Annette Hougaard Hölmich, Lisbet Rosenkrantz Drejøe, Jennifer Berg Andersen, Pia Cajsa Leth Khorasani, Hoda Toyserkani, Navid Mohamadpour Thomsen, Jørn Bo Sørensen, Jens Ahm JPRAS Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) is associated with a high complication rate. Retrospective studies suggest that incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) might reduce complications, especially seroma, following ILND. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter, randomized (1:1), open-labeled, parallel-group trial. Patients with macrometastic melanoma to the inguinal lymph nodes and eligible for ILND were randomized to receive either iNPWT for 14 postoperative days or conventional wound dressing. The primary outcome was seroma incidence. Secondary outcomes included surgical-site infection, wound rupture, wound necrosis, hematoma, rehospitalization and readmission rates between groups. All outcomes were registered 3 months after ILND and analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: The trial was terminated early due to a low recruitment rate as a consequence of a change in the national treatment protocol, and the estimated sample size was not reached. Twenty patients were included and randomized in the study. The trial showed less seroma formation between the iNPWT 6/11 (55%) and control 7/9 (78%) groups; however, this was not statistically significant (p = 0.29). Similarly, there were no differences in the rates of surgical-site infection (p = 0.63), wound rupture (p = 0.19), wound necrosis (p = 0.82), hematoma (p = 0.19), reoperation (p = 0.82) or readmission (p = 0.34) between groups. CONCLUSION: There was a tendency toward fewer complications in the iNPWT group, however this trial was underpowered and could not confirm the hypothesis that iNPWT reduces complications after ILND. Future randomized controlled trials are required to fully evaluate the treatment potential of iNPWT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was prospectively registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03433937. Elsevier 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9593268/ /pubmed/36304071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2022.08.003 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Jørgensen, Mads Gustaf
Chakera, Annette Hougaard
Hölmich, Lisbet Rosenkrantz
Drejøe, Jennifer Berg
Andersen, Pia Cajsa Leth
Khorasani, Hoda
Toyserkani, Navid Mohamadpour
Thomsen, Jørn Bo
Sørensen, Jens Ahm
Can prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy Reduce Wound Complications After Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title Can prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy Reduce Wound Complications After Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Can prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy Reduce Wound Complications After Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Can prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy Reduce Wound Complications After Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Can prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy Reduce Wound Complications After Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Can prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy Reduce Wound Complications After Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort can prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy reduce wound complications after inguinal lymph node dissection for melanoma? results from a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36304071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2022.08.003
work_keys_str_mv AT jørgensenmadsgustaf canprophylacticincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyreducewoundcomplicationsafteringuinallymphnodedissectionformelanomaresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chakeraannettehougaard canprophylacticincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyreducewoundcomplicationsafteringuinallymphnodedissectionformelanomaresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT holmichlisbetrosenkrantz canprophylacticincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyreducewoundcomplicationsafteringuinallymphnodedissectionformelanomaresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT drejøejenniferberg canprophylacticincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyreducewoundcomplicationsafteringuinallymphnodedissectionformelanomaresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT andersenpiacajsaleth canprophylacticincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyreducewoundcomplicationsafteringuinallymphnodedissectionformelanomaresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT khorasanihoda canprophylacticincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyreducewoundcomplicationsafteringuinallymphnodedissectionformelanomaresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT toyserkaninavidmohamadpour canprophylacticincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyreducewoundcomplicationsafteringuinallymphnodedissectionformelanomaresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT thomsenjørnbo canprophylacticincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyreducewoundcomplicationsafteringuinallymphnodedissectionformelanomaresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sørensenjensahm canprophylacticincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyreducewoundcomplicationsafteringuinallymphnodedissectionformelanomaresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial