Cargando…

The Cost-Effectiveness of Normal-Saline Pulsed Lavage for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a well-described complication after total joint arthroplasty which imposes a substantial burden of morbidity and mortality on the individual, as well as cost to the health-care system. This study used a break-even analysis to investigate the cost-effec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luck, Trevor, Zaki, Peter, Michels, Ryan, Slotkin, Eric M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36304695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.09.014
_version_ 1784815123394723840
author Luck, Trevor
Zaki, Peter
Michels, Ryan
Slotkin, Eric M.
author_facet Luck, Trevor
Zaki, Peter
Michels, Ryan
Slotkin, Eric M.
author_sort Luck, Trevor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a well-described complication after total joint arthroplasty which imposes a substantial burden of morbidity and mortality on the individual, as well as cost to the health-care system. This study used a break-even analysis to investigate the cost-effectiveness of pulsed saline lavage (PSL) for PJI prophylaxis after a primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: An established model was used to calculate the minimum cost-effective absolute risk reduction of PSL for infection prophylaxis after a total joint arthroplasty. Baseline infection rates of TKA and THA and the cost of a revision surgery for PJI were derived from the literature while the cost of PSL implementation was obtained from institutional data. RESULTS: PSL is cost-effective at an initial infection rate of 1.10%, revision costs of $32,132 for TKA PJI, and a protocol cost of $38.28 if it reduces infection rates by 0.12% or prevents infection in 1 out of 839 patients. PSL is cost-effective at an initial infection rate of 1.63% and a revision cost of $39,713 for THA PJI if it reduces infection rates by 0.10% or prevents infection in 1 out of 1037 patients. The absolute risk reduction needed for economic viability did not change with varying baseline infection rates and did not exceed 0.38% for infection treatment costs as low as $10,000 and remained less than 0.47% even if PSL cost was as high as $150. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PSL is a cost-effective protocol for PJI prophylaxis after TKAs and THAs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9593269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95932692022-10-26 The Cost-Effectiveness of Normal-Saline Pulsed Lavage for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty Luck, Trevor Zaki, Peter Michels, Ryan Slotkin, Eric M. Arthroplast Today Original Research BACKGROUND: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a well-described complication after total joint arthroplasty which imposes a substantial burden of morbidity and mortality on the individual, as well as cost to the health-care system. This study used a break-even analysis to investigate the cost-effectiveness of pulsed saline lavage (PSL) for PJI prophylaxis after a primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: An established model was used to calculate the minimum cost-effective absolute risk reduction of PSL for infection prophylaxis after a total joint arthroplasty. Baseline infection rates of TKA and THA and the cost of a revision surgery for PJI were derived from the literature while the cost of PSL implementation was obtained from institutional data. RESULTS: PSL is cost-effective at an initial infection rate of 1.10%, revision costs of $32,132 for TKA PJI, and a protocol cost of $38.28 if it reduces infection rates by 0.12% or prevents infection in 1 out of 839 patients. PSL is cost-effective at an initial infection rate of 1.63% and a revision cost of $39,713 for THA PJI if it reduces infection rates by 0.10% or prevents infection in 1 out of 1037 patients. The absolute risk reduction needed for economic viability did not change with varying baseline infection rates and did not exceed 0.38% for infection treatment costs as low as $10,000 and remained less than 0.47% even if PSL cost was as high as $150. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PSL is a cost-effective protocol for PJI prophylaxis after TKAs and THAs. Elsevier 2022-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9593269/ /pubmed/36304695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.09.014 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Luck, Trevor
Zaki, Peter
Michels, Ryan
Slotkin, Eric M.
The Cost-Effectiveness of Normal-Saline Pulsed Lavage for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty
title The Cost-Effectiveness of Normal-Saline Pulsed Lavage for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty
title_full The Cost-Effectiveness of Normal-Saline Pulsed Lavage for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty
title_fullStr The Cost-Effectiveness of Normal-Saline Pulsed Lavage for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed The Cost-Effectiveness of Normal-Saline Pulsed Lavage for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty
title_short The Cost-Effectiveness of Normal-Saline Pulsed Lavage for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty
title_sort cost-effectiveness of normal-saline pulsed lavage for infection prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36304695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.09.014
work_keys_str_mv AT lucktrevor thecosteffectivenessofnormalsalinepulsedlavageforinfectionprophylaxisintotaljointarthroplasty
AT zakipeter thecosteffectivenessofnormalsalinepulsedlavageforinfectionprophylaxisintotaljointarthroplasty
AT michelsryan thecosteffectivenessofnormalsalinepulsedlavageforinfectionprophylaxisintotaljointarthroplasty
AT slotkinericm thecosteffectivenessofnormalsalinepulsedlavageforinfectionprophylaxisintotaljointarthroplasty
AT lucktrevor costeffectivenessofnormalsalinepulsedlavageforinfectionprophylaxisintotaljointarthroplasty
AT zakipeter costeffectivenessofnormalsalinepulsedlavageforinfectionprophylaxisintotaljointarthroplasty
AT michelsryan costeffectivenessofnormalsalinepulsedlavageforinfectionprophylaxisintotaljointarthroplasty
AT slotkinericm costeffectivenessofnormalsalinepulsedlavageforinfectionprophylaxisintotaljointarthroplasty