Cargando…
The Cost-Effectiveness of Normal-Saline Pulsed Lavage for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty
BACKGROUND: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a well-described complication after total joint arthroplasty which imposes a substantial burden of morbidity and mortality on the individual, as well as cost to the health-care system. This study used a break-even analysis to investigate the cost-effec...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36304695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.09.014 |
_version_ | 1784815123394723840 |
---|---|
author | Luck, Trevor Zaki, Peter Michels, Ryan Slotkin, Eric M. |
author_facet | Luck, Trevor Zaki, Peter Michels, Ryan Slotkin, Eric M. |
author_sort | Luck, Trevor |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a well-described complication after total joint arthroplasty which imposes a substantial burden of morbidity and mortality on the individual, as well as cost to the health-care system. This study used a break-even analysis to investigate the cost-effectiveness of pulsed saline lavage (PSL) for PJI prophylaxis after a primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: An established model was used to calculate the minimum cost-effective absolute risk reduction of PSL for infection prophylaxis after a total joint arthroplasty. Baseline infection rates of TKA and THA and the cost of a revision surgery for PJI were derived from the literature while the cost of PSL implementation was obtained from institutional data. RESULTS: PSL is cost-effective at an initial infection rate of 1.10%, revision costs of $32,132 for TKA PJI, and a protocol cost of $38.28 if it reduces infection rates by 0.12% or prevents infection in 1 out of 839 patients. PSL is cost-effective at an initial infection rate of 1.63% and a revision cost of $39,713 for THA PJI if it reduces infection rates by 0.10% or prevents infection in 1 out of 1037 patients. The absolute risk reduction needed for economic viability did not change with varying baseline infection rates and did not exceed 0.38% for infection treatment costs as low as $10,000 and remained less than 0.47% even if PSL cost was as high as $150. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PSL is a cost-effective protocol for PJI prophylaxis after TKAs and THAs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9593269 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95932692022-10-26 The Cost-Effectiveness of Normal-Saline Pulsed Lavage for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty Luck, Trevor Zaki, Peter Michels, Ryan Slotkin, Eric M. Arthroplast Today Original Research BACKGROUND: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a well-described complication after total joint arthroplasty which imposes a substantial burden of morbidity and mortality on the individual, as well as cost to the health-care system. This study used a break-even analysis to investigate the cost-effectiveness of pulsed saline lavage (PSL) for PJI prophylaxis after a primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: An established model was used to calculate the minimum cost-effective absolute risk reduction of PSL for infection prophylaxis after a total joint arthroplasty. Baseline infection rates of TKA and THA and the cost of a revision surgery for PJI were derived from the literature while the cost of PSL implementation was obtained from institutional data. RESULTS: PSL is cost-effective at an initial infection rate of 1.10%, revision costs of $32,132 for TKA PJI, and a protocol cost of $38.28 if it reduces infection rates by 0.12% or prevents infection in 1 out of 839 patients. PSL is cost-effective at an initial infection rate of 1.63% and a revision cost of $39,713 for THA PJI if it reduces infection rates by 0.10% or prevents infection in 1 out of 1037 patients. The absolute risk reduction needed for economic viability did not change with varying baseline infection rates and did not exceed 0.38% for infection treatment costs as low as $10,000 and remained less than 0.47% even if PSL cost was as high as $150. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PSL is a cost-effective protocol for PJI prophylaxis after TKAs and THAs. Elsevier 2022-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9593269/ /pubmed/36304695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.09.014 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Luck, Trevor Zaki, Peter Michels, Ryan Slotkin, Eric M. The Cost-Effectiveness of Normal-Saline Pulsed Lavage for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty |
title | The Cost-Effectiveness of Normal-Saline Pulsed Lavage for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty |
title_full | The Cost-Effectiveness of Normal-Saline Pulsed Lavage for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty |
title_fullStr | The Cost-Effectiveness of Normal-Saline Pulsed Lavage for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | The Cost-Effectiveness of Normal-Saline Pulsed Lavage for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty |
title_short | The Cost-Effectiveness of Normal-Saline Pulsed Lavage for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of normal-saline pulsed lavage for infection prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36304695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.09.014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lucktrevor thecosteffectivenessofnormalsalinepulsedlavageforinfectionprophylaxisintotaljointarthroplasty AT zakipeter thecosteffectivenessofnormalsalinepulsedlavageforinfectionprophylaxisintotaljointarthroplasty AT michelsryan thecosteffectivenessofnormalsalinepulsedlavageforinfectionprophylaxisintotaljointarthroplasty AT slotkinericm thecosteffectivenessofnormalsalinepulsedlavageforinfectionprophylaxisintotaljointarthroplasty AT lucktrevor costeffectivenessofnormalsalinepulsedlavageforinfectionprophylaxisintotaljointarthroplasty AT zakipeter costeffectivenessofnormalsalinepulsedlavageforinfectionprophylaxisintotaljointarthroplasty AT michelsryan costeffectivenessofnormalsalinepulsedlavageforinfectionprophylaxisintotaljointarthroplasty AT slotkinericm costeffectivenessofnormalsalinepulsedlavageforinfectionprophylaxisintotaljointarthroplasty |