Cargando…

Validation of a national checklist for continuous service improvement in a decentralised framework

BACKGROUND: Previous studies allowed defining a novel checklist for the participatory evaluation of person-centredness in hospital care using 243 items, grouped in 4 main areas, 12 sub-areas and 29 criteria. We aimed to validate a reduced set of core items that could be continuously used for service...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cardinali, F, Carzaniga, S, Martini, L, Loiudice, M, Carinci, F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593376/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.430
_version_ 1784815144146042880
author Cardinali, F
Carzaniga, S
Martini, L
Loiudice, M
Carinci, F
author_facet Cardinali, F
Carzaniga, S
Martini, L
Loiudice, M
Carinci, F
author_sort Cardinali, F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies allowed defining a novel checklist for the participatory evaluation of person-centredness in hospital care using 243 items, grouped in 4 main areas, 12 sub-areas and 29 criteria. We aimed to validate a reduced set of core items that could be continuously used for service improvement in Italy. METHODS: Validation was performed using data collected during the last national survey carried out in 2017-2018 in N = 387 acute care hospitals from 16 out of 21 Italian regions. Descriptive measures for each item were used to assess eligibility for factor analysis, applied separately on each of the 4 main areas originally identified. Varimax rotation with eigenvalues>1 was used to optimise factor structure. Items with an item-total correlation>0.30 and factor loadings>0.4 were attributed to individual factors. Items with inter-item correlation coefficient>0.70 were included in a list of candidate mergers, submitted to expert opinion. Cronbach's alpha was used to assess overall internal consistency. RESULTS: A total of 183 out of 243 items included in the original checklist were submitted to factor analysis. Overall values of Cronbach's alpha ranged between 0.77-0.90, indicating a high consistency. A total of 67 items were finally attributed to 4 main areas, allocated as follows: 16 items in 4 sub-areas for ‘Person-oriented organisational and care processes’, 16 items in 4 sub-areas for ‘Physical accessibility, livability and comfort of the facilities’, 15 items in 3 sub-areas for ‘Access to information, streamlining and transparency’, and 20 items in 4 sub-areas for ‘Taking care of the relationship with patients and citizens’. CONCLUSIONS: A simplified checklist including a manageable number of items that can be easily managed to evaluate hospital services was identified through an objective validation process. The national experience can provide valuable lessons for the application of participatory approaches of person-centred care. KEY MESSAGES: • A standardised checklist has been validated using survey data collected through a participatory process in Italian regions. • The checklist can be used to evaluate and improve person-centered hospital services through a manageable number of items and factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9593376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95933762022-11-22 Validation of a national checklist for continuous service improvement in a decentralised framework Cardinali, F Carzaniga, S Martini, L Loiudice, M Carinci, F Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme BACKGROUND: Previous studies allowed defining a novel checklist for the participatory evaluation of person-centredness in hospital care using 243 items, grouped in 4 main areas, 12 sub-areas and 29 criteria. We aimed to validate a reduced set of core items that could be continuously used for service improvement in Italy. METHODS: Validation was performed using data collected during the last national survey carried out in 2017-2018 in N = 387 acute care hospitals from 16 out of 21 Italian regions. Descriptive measures for each item were used to assess eligibility for factor analysis, applied separately on each of the 4 main areas originally identified. Varimax rotation with eigenvalues>1 was used to optimise factor structure. Items with an item-total correlation>0.30 and factor loadings>0.4 were attributed to individual factors. Items with inter-item correlation coefficient>0.70 were included in a list of candidate mergers, submitted to expert opinion. Cronbach's alpha was used to assess overall internal consistency. RESULTS: A total of 183 out of 243 items included in the original checklist were submitted to factor analysis. Overall values of Cronbach's alpha ranged between 0.77-0.90, indicating a high consistency. A total of 67 items were finally attributed to 4 main areas, allocated as follows: 16 items in 4 sub-areas for ‘Person-oriented organisational and care processes’, 16 items in 4 sub-areas for ‘Physical accessibility, livability and comfort of the facilities’, 15 items in 3 sub-areas for ‘Access to information, streamlining and transparency’, and 20 items in 4 sub-areas for ‘Taking care of the relationship with patients and citizens’. CONCLUSIONS: A simplified checklist including a manageable number of items that can be easily managed to evaluate hospital services was identified through an objective validation process. The national experience can provide valuable lessons for the application of participatory approaches of person-centred care. KEY MESSAGES: • A standardised checklist has been validated using survey data collected through a participatory process in Italian regions. • The checklist can be used to evaluate and improve person-centered hospital services through a manageable number of items and factors. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9593376/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.430 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
Cardinali, F
Carzaniga, S
Martini, L
Loiudice, M
Carinci, F
Validation of a national checklist for continuous service improvement in a decentralised framework
title Validation of a national checklist for continuous service improvement in a decentralised framework
title_full Validation of a national checklist for continuous service improvement in a decentralised framework
title_fullStr Validation of a national checklist for continuous service improvement in a decentralised framework
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a national checklist for continuous service improvement in a decentralised framework
title_short Validation of a national checklist for continuous service improvement in a decentralised framework
title_sort validation of a national checklist for continuous service improvement in a decentralised framework
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593376/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.430
work_keys_str_mv AT cardinalif validationofanationalchecklistforcontinuousserviceimprovementinadecentralisedframework
AT carzanigas validationofanationalchecklistforcontinuousserviceimprovementinadecentralisedframework
AT martinil validationofanationalchecklistforcontinuousserviceimprovementinadecentralisedframework
AT loiudicem validationofanationalchecklistforcontinuousserviceimprovementinadecentralisedframework
AT carincif validationofanationalchecklistforcontinuousserviceimprovementinadecentralisedframework