Cargando…

Measuring health expectancy in the European Union

BACKGROUND: Healthy life expectancy (HLE) is a population health measure that combines mortality and morbidity, which can be calculated using different methods. In this study, we aimed to assess the correlation, reliability and (dis)agreement between two estimates monitored in the European Union (EU...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santos, JV, Viana, J, Devleesschauwer, B, Haagsma, JA, Costa Santos, C, Ricciardi, W, Freitas, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593407/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.067
_version_ 1784815152052305920
author Santos, JV
Viana, J
Devleesschauwer, B
Haagsma, JA
Costa Santos, C
Ricciardi, W
Freitas, A
author_facet Santos, JV
Viana, J
Devleesschauwer, B
Haagsma, JA
Costa Santos, C
Ricciardi, W
Freitas, A
author_sort Santos, JV
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Healthy life expectancy (HLE) is a population health measure that combines mortality and morbidity, which can be calculated using different methods. In this study, we aimed to assess the correlation, reliability and (dis)agreement between two estimates monitored in the European Union (EU), that is, the European Commission's HLE based on self-perceived health (SPH-HLE) and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation's HLE based on disability weight (DW-HLE), by sex, and comparing these results with LE and proportion of life spent in good health (%GH). METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in the EU28 countries, between 2010 and 2017. The HLE methods differ in definition, measurement and valuation of health states. While SPH-HLE relies directly on one question, DW-HLE relies on epidemiological data adjusted for DW. Spearman's r, intraclass correlation coefficient, information-based measure of disagreement and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess reliability, correlation and disagreement in HLE resulting from both methods and in LE or %GH measured by both institutions. RESULTS: Correlation and reliability between SPH-HLE and DW-HLE were good (better for males), with low disagreement, and were even better for LE between both institutions. The HLE Bland-Altman plots suggest a variability range of approximately 6 years for both sexes, higher for females. There was also an increasing HLE difference between methods with higher average HLE for both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: We showed wide variations between both methods with a clear and different high impact on female and male HLE, showing a tendency for countries with higher health expectancies to yield larger gaps between SPH-HLE and DW-HLE. Acknowledgements: This presentation was supported by National Funds through FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia,I.P., within CINTESIS, R&D Unit (reference UIDP/4255/2020) KEY MESSAGES: • Different methods for evaluating health expectancy lead to significantly different results. • There is a systematic tendency with countries with higher health expectancies to yield larger gaps between SPH-HLE and DW-HLE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9593407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95934072022-11-22 Measuring health expectancy in the European Union Santos, JV Viana, J Devleesschauwer, B Haagsma, JA Costa Santos, C Ricciardi, W Freitas, A Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme BACKGROUND: Healthy life expectancy (HLE) is a population health measure that combines mortality and morbidity, which can be calculated using different methods. In this study, we aimed to assess the correlation, reliability and (dis)agreement between two estimates monitored in the European Union (EU), that is, the European Commission's HLE based on self-perceived health (SPH-HLE) and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation's HLE based on disability weight (DW-HLE), by sex, and comparing these results with LE and proportion of life spent in good health (%GH). METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in the EU28 countries, between 2010 and 2017. The HLE methods differ in definition, measurement and valuation of health states. While SPH-HLE relies directly on one question, DW-HLE relies on epidemiological data adjusted for DW. Spearman's r, intraclass correlation coefficient, information-based measure of disagreement and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess reliability, correlation and disagreement in HLE resulting from both methods and in LE or %GH measured by both institutions. RESULTS: Correlation and reliability between SPH-HLE and DW-HLE were good (better for males), with low disagreement, and were even better for LE between both institutions. The HLE Bland-Altman plots suggest a variability range of approximately 6 years for both sexes, higher for females. There was also an increasing HLE difference between methods with higher average HLE for both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: We showed wide variations between both methods with a clear and different high impact on female and male HLE, showing a tendency for countries with higher health expectancies to yield larger gaps between SPH-HLE and DW-HLE. Acknowledgements: This presentation was supported by National Funds through FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia,I.P., within CINTESIS, R&D Unit (reference UIDP/4255/2020) KEY MESSAGES: • Different methods for evaluating health expectancy lead to significantly different results. • There is a systematic tendency with countries with higher health expectancies to yield larger gaps between SPH-HLE and DW-HLE. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9593407/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.067 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
Santos, JV
Viana, J
Devleesschauwer, B
Haagsma, JA
Costa Santos, C
Ricciardi, W
Freitas, A
Measuring health expectancy in the European Union
title Measuring health expectancy in the European Union
title_full Measuring health expectancy in the European Union
title_fullStr Measuring health expectancy in the European Union
title_full_unstemmed Measuring health expectancy in the European Union
title_short Measuring health expectancy in the European Union
title_sort measuring health expectancy in the european union
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593407/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.067
work_keys_str_mv AT santosjv measuringhealthexpectancyintheeuropeanunion
AT vianaj measuringhealthexpectancyintheeuropeanunion
AT devleesschauwerb measuringhealthexpectancyintheeuropeanunion
AT haagsmaja measuringhealthexpectancyintheeuropeanunion
AT costasantosc measuringhealthexpectancyintheeuropeanunion
AT ricciardiw measuringhealthexpectancyintheeuropeanunion
AT freitasa measuringhealthexpectancyintheeuropeanunion