Cargando…

A Nationwide Observational Study of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Denmark during the COVID-19 Pandemic

The aim of this study was to determine whether COVID-19 restrictions had an impact on Chlamydia trachomatis infections compared with 2018 and 2019. A retrospective nationwide observational study was performed using monthly incidences of laboratory-confirmed chlamydia cases and number of tests, obtai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: HEDLEY, Paula L., HOFFMANN, Steen, LAUSTEN-THOMSEN, Ulrik, VOLDSTEDLUND, Marianne, BJERRE, Karsten Dalsgaard, HVIID, Anders, KREBS, Lone, JENSEN, Jørgen S., CHRISTIANSEN, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35393629
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v102.2324
_version_ 1784815169869709312
author HEDLEY, Paula L.
HOFFMANN, Steen
LAUSTEN-THOMSEN, Ulrik
VOLDSTEDLUND, Marianne
BJERRE, Karsten Dalsgaard
HVIID, Anders
KREBS, Lone
JENSEN, Jørgen S.
CHRISTIANSEN, Michael
author_facet HEDLEY, Paula L.
HOFFMANN, Steen
LAUSTEN-THOMSEN, Ulrik
VOLDSTEDLUND, Marianne
BJERRE, Karsten Dalsgaard
HVIID, Anders
KREBS, Lone
JENSEN, Jørgen S.
CHRISTIANSEN, Michael
author_sort HEDLEY, Paula L.
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to determine whether COVID-19 restrictions had an impact on Chlamydia trachomatis infections compared with 2018 and 2019. A retrospective nationwide observational study was performed using monthly incidences of laboratory-confirmed chlamydia cases and number of tests, obtained from Danish national surveillance data. Testing rates and positivity rates were compared using Poisson and logistic regression. The first Danish COVID-19 lockdown (12 March to 14 April 2020) resulted in a reduction in the number of chlamydia tests performed (rate ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.71–0.73) and a consequent reduction in the number of laboratory-identified cases (66.5 vs 88.3 per 100,000 population during the same period in 2018 to 2019). This period was followed by a return of testing and test positivity close to the level seen in 2018 to 2019. The second Danish COVID-19 lockdown (17 December to 31 March 2021) resulted in crude incidence rates of laboratory-confirmed chlamydia infection that were similar to the crude incidence rates seen during same period in 2018 to 2019. In conclusion, the Danish COVID-19 restrictions have had negligible effects on laboratory-confirmed C. trachomatis transmission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9593478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95934782022-11-16 A Nationwide Observational Study of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Denmark during the COVID-19 Pandemic HEDLEY, Paula L. HOFFMANN, Steen LAUSTEN-THOMSEN, Ulrik VOLDSTEDLUND, Marianne BJERRE, Karsten Dalsgaard HVIID, Anders KREBS, Lone JENSEN, Jørgen S. CHRISTIANSEN, Michael Acta Derm Venereol Original Article The aim of this study was to determine whether COVID-19 restrictions had an impact on Chlamydia trachomatis infections compared with 2018 and 2019. A retrospective nationwide observational study was performed using monthly incidences of laboratory-confirmed chlamydia cases and number of tests, obtained from Danish national surveillance data. Testing rates and positivity rates were compared using Poisson and logistic regression. The first Danish COVID-19 lockdown (12 March to 14 April 2020) resulted in a reduction in the number of chlamydia tests performed (rate ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.71–0.73) and a consequent reduction in the number of laboratory-identified cases (66.5 vs 88.3 per 100,000 population during the same period in 2018 to 2019). This period was followed by a return of testing and test positivity close to the level seen in 2018 to 2019. The second Danish COVID-19 lockdown (17 December to 31 March 2021) resulted in crude incidence rates of laboratory-confirmed chlamydia infection that were similar to the crude incidence rates seen during same period in 2018 to 2019. In conclusion, the Danish COVID-19 restrictions have had negligible effects on laboratory-confirmed C. trachomatis transmission. Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica 2022-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9593478/ /pubmed/35393629 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v102.2324 Text en © 2022 Acta Dermato-Venereologica https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license
spellingShingle Original Article
HEDLEY, Paula L.
HOFFMANN, Steen
LAUSTEN-THOMSEN, Ulrik
VOLDSTEDLUND, Marianne
BJERRE, Karsten Dalsgaard
HVIID, Anders
KREBS, Lone
JENSEN, Jørgen S.
CHRISTIANSEN, Michael
A Nationwide Observational Study of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Denmark during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title A Nationwide Observational Study of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Denmark during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full A Nationwide Observational Study of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Denmark during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_fullStr A Nationwide Observational Study of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Denmark during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed A Nationwide Observational Study of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Denmark during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_short A Nationwide Observational Study of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Denmark during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_sort nationwide observational study of chlamydia trachomatis infections in denmark during the covid-19 pandemic
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35393629
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v102.2324
work_keys_str_mv AT hedleypaulal anationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic
AT hoffmannsteen anationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic
AT laustenthomsenulrik anationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic
AT voldstedlundmarianne anationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic
AT bjerrekarstendalsgaard anationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic
AT hviidanders anationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic
AT krebslone anationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic
AT jensenjørgens anationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic
AT christiansenmichael anationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic
AT hedleypaulal nationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic
AT hoffmannsteen nationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic
AT laustenthomsenulrik nationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic
AT voldstedlundmarianne nationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic
AT bjerrekarstendalsgaard nationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic
AT hviidanders nationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic
AT krebslone nationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic
AT jensenjørgens nationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic
AT christiansenmichael nationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic