Cargando…
A Nationwide Observational Study of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Denmark during the COVID-19 Pandemic
The aim of this study was to determine whether COVID-19 restrictions had an impact on Chlamydia trachomatis infections compared with 2018 and 2019. A retrospective nationwide observational study was performed using monthly incidences of laboratory-confirmed chlamydia cases and number of tests, obtai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35393629 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v102.2324 |
_version_ | 1784815169869709312 |
---|---|
author | HEDLEY, Paula L. HOFFMANN, Steen LAUSTEN-THOMSEN, Ulrik VOLDSTEDLUND, Marianne BJERRE, Karsten Dalsgaard HVIID, Anders KREBS, Lone JENSEN, Jørgen S. CHRISTIANSEN, Michael |
author_facet | HEDLEY, Paula L. HOFFMANN, Steen LAUSTEN-THOMSEN, Ulrik VOLDSTEDLUND, Marianne BJERRE, Karsten Dalsgaard HVIID, Anders KREBS, Lone JENSEN, Jørgen S. CHRISTIANSEN, Michael |
author_sort | HEDLEY, Paula L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to determine whether COVID-19 restrictions had an impact on Chlamydia trachomatis infections compared with 2018 and 2019. A retrospective nationwide observational study was performed using monthly incidences of laboratory-confirmed chlamydia cases and number of tests, obtained from Danish national surveillance data. Testing rates and positivity rates were compared using Poisson and logistic regression. The first Danish COVID-19 lockdown (12 March to 14 April 2020) resulted in a reduction in the number of chlamydia tests performed (rate ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.71–0.73) and a consequent reduction in the number of laboratory-identified cases (66.5 vs 88.3 per 100,000 population during the same period in 2018 to 2019). This period was followed by a return of testing and test positivity close to the level seen in 2018 to 2019. The second Danish COVID-19 lockdown (17 December to 31 March 2021) resulted in crude incidence rates of laboratory-confirmed chlamydia infection that were similar to the crude incidence rates seen during same period in 2018 to 2019. In conclusion, the Danish COVID-19 restrictions have had negligible effects on laboratory-confirmed C. trachomatis transmission. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9593478 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95934782022-11-16 A Nationwide Observational Study of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Denmark during the COVID-19 Pandemic HEDLEY, Paula L. HOFFMANN, Steen LAUSTEN-THOMSEN, Ulrik VOLDSTEDLUND, Marianne BJERRE, Karsten Dalsgaard HVIID, Anders KREBS, Lone JENSEN, Jørgen S. CHRISTIANSEN, Michael Acta Derm Venereol Original Article The aim of this study was to determine whether COVID-19 restrictions had an impact on Chlamydia trachomatis infections compared with 2018 and 2019. A retrospective nationwide observational study was performed using monthly incidences of laboratory-confirmed chlamydia cases and number of tests, obtained from Danish national surveillance data. Testing rates and positivity rates were compared using Poisson and logistic regression. The first Danish COVID-19 lockdown (12 March to 14 April 2020) resulted in a reduction in the number of chlamydia tests performed (rate ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.71–0.73) and a consequent reduction in the number of laboratory-identified cases (66.5 vs 88.3 per 100,000 population during the same period in 2018 to 2019). This period was followed by a return of testing and test positivity close to the level seen in 2018 to 2019. The second Danish COVID-19 lockdown (17 December to 31 March 2021) resulted in crude incidence rates of laboratory-confirmed chlamydia infection that were similar to the crude incidence rates seen during same period in 2018 to 2019. In conclusion, the Danish COVID-19 restrictions have had negligible effects on laboratory-confirmed C. trachomatis transmission. Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica 2022-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9593478/ /pubmed/35393629 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v102.2324 Text en © 2022 Acta Dermato-Venereologica https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license |
spellingShingle | Original Article HEDLEY, Paula L. HOFFMANN, Steen LAUSTEN-THOMSEN, Ulrik VOLDSTEDLUND, Marianne BJERRE, Karsten Dalsgaard HVIID, Anders KREBS, Lone JENSEN, Jørgen S. CHRISTIANSEN, Michael A Nationwide Observational Study of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Denmark during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title | A Nationwide Observational Study of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Denmark during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full | A Nationwide Observational Study of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Denmark during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_fullStr | A Nationwide Observational Study of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Denmark during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | A Nationwide Observational Study of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Denmark during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_short | A Nationwide Observational Study of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Denmark during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_sort | nationwide observational study of chlamydia trachomatis infections in denmark during the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35393629 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v102.2324 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hedleypaulal anationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic AT hoffmannsteen anationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic AT laustenthomsenulrik anationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic AT voldstedlundmarianne anationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic AT bjerrekarstendalsgaard anationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic AT hviidanders anationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic AT krebslone anationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic AT jensenjørgens anationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic AT christiansenmichael anationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic AT hedleypaulal nationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic AT hoffmannsteen nationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic AT laustenthomsenulrik nationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic AT voldstedlundmarianne nationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic AT bjerrekarstendalsgaard nationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic AT hviidanders nationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic AT krebslone nationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic AT jensenjørgens nationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic AT christiansenmichael nationwideobservationalstudyofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectionsindenmarkduringthecovid19pandemic |