Cargando…

Implementation of resilience training programmes in children and adolescents: value and barriers: Claudio Pacillo

BACKGROUND: Emotional distress increasingly represents a major burden in children and adolescents (C&A), especially in conflict zones where its prevalence is estimated to reach 70%. Resilience training programmes (RTPs) are interventions that seek to enhance resilience in individuals or groups p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pacillo, C, Malorni, W, Moscato, U, Sisti, LG
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593505/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.523
_version_ 1784815176539701248
author Pacillo, C
Malorni, W
Moscato, U
Sisti, LG
author_facet Pacillo, C
Malorni, W
Moscato, U
Sisti, LG
author_sort Pacillo, C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emotional distress increasingly represents a major burden in children and adolescents (C&A), especially in conflict zones where its prevalence is estimated to reach 70%. Resilience training programmes (RTPs) are interventions that seek to enhance resilience in individuals or groups pursuing mental distress prevention. Literature suggests RTPs be particularly effective in C&A; however, their effectiveness and value for public health are still unclear. METHODS: A scoping review was performed in order to summarize evidence regarding the implementation and effectiveness of RTPs in children and adolescents. A search string has been built according to the PICO model and launched on PubMed, PsycInfo, Academia databases. Additional references were identified by a hand-search in Google Scholar. Studies included were narratively summarized according to topics that emerged. RESULTS: 18 articles were finally included in the review. Main issues were 1) RTPs seem to be more effective in adolescents rather than in children; 2) COVID-19 pandemic has raised the attention towards RTPs in C&A; 3) beyond conflict zones their implementation is increasingly recognized in supporting C&A management of daily stressors and traumas also in C&A with disabilities; 4) school is identified as the key setting for RTPs; 5) the high heterogeneity in RTPs approaches, contexts and study samples limits a conclusive effectiveness assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlighted how RTPs are increasingly recognized as a tool to improve C&A cognitive and behavioral functioning and resilience to external stressors, getting greater interest in the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite relevant theoretical support and promising study results, RTPs still lack strong evidence supporting their embracement by policymakers and effective implementation in public health policy. In order to not miss this chance, more efforts are needed in strengthening RTPs conceptualization and cost-effectiveness studies. KEY MESSAGES: • RTPs are a promising tool to enhance the resilience of children and adolescents gaining increasing interest due to the COVID-19 pandemic. • More studies are needed to provide a strong evidence base that supports their acknowledgment by policymakers and their implementation in public health policies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9593505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95935052022-11-04 Implementation of resilience training programmes in children and adolescents: value and barriers: Claudio Pacillo Pacillo, C Malorni, W Moscato, U Sisti, LG Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme BACKGROUND: Emotional distress increasingly represents a major burden in children and adolescents (C&A), especially in conflict zones where its prevalence is estimated to reach 70%. Resilience training programmes (RTPs) are interventions that seek to enhance resilience in individuals or groups pursuing mental distress prevention. Literature suggests RTPs be particularly effective in C&A; however, their effectiveness and value for public health are still unclear. METHODS: A scoping review was performed in order to summarize evidence regarding the implementation and effectiveness of RTPs in children and adolescents. A search string has been built according to the PICO model and launched on PubMed, PsycInfo, Academia databases. Additional references were identified by a hand-search in Google Scholar. Studies included were narratively summarized according to topics that emerged. RESULTS: 18 articles were finally included in the review. Main issues were 1) RTPs seem to be more effective in adolescents rather than in children; 2) COVID-19 pandemic has raised the attention towards RTPs in C&A; 3) beyond conflict zones their implementation is increasingly recognized in supporting C&A management of daily stressors and traumas also in C&A with disabilities; 4) school is identified as the key setting for RTPs; 5) the high heterogeneity in RTPs approaches, contexts and study samples limits a conclusive effectiveness assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlighted how RTPs are increasingly recognized as a tool to improve C&A cognitive and behavioral functioning and resilience to external stressors, getting greater interest in the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite relevant theoretical support and promising study results, RTPs still lack strong evidence supporting their embracement by policymakers and effective implementation in public health policy. In order to not miss this chance, more efforts are needed in strengthening RTPs conceptualization and cost-effectiveness studies. KEY MESSAGES: • RTPs are a promising tool to enhance the resilience of children and adolescents gaining increasing interest due to the COVID-19 pandemic. • More studies are needed to provide a strong evidence base that supports their acknowledgment by policymakers and their implementation in public health policies. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9593505/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.523 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
Pacillo, C
Malorni, W
Moscato, U
Sisti, LG
Implementation of resilience training programmes in children and adolescents: value and barriers: Claudio Pacillo
title Implementation of resilience training programmes in children and adolescents: value and barriers: Claudio Pacillo
title_full Implementation of resilience training programmes in children and adolescents: value and barriers: Claudio Pacillo
title_fullStr Implementation of resilience training programmes in children and adolescents: value and barriers: Claudio Pacillo
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of resilience training programmes in children and adolescents: value and barriers: Claudio Pacillo
title_short Implementation of resilience training programmes in children and adolescents: value and barriers: Claudio Pacillo
title_sort implementation of resilience training programmes in children and adolescents: value and barriers: claudio pacillo
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593505/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.523
work_keys_str_mv AT pacilloc implementationofresiliencetrainingprogrammesinchildrenandadolescentsvalueandbarriersclaudiopacillo
AT malorniw implementationofresiliencetrainingprogrammesinchildrenandadolescentsvalueandbarriersclaudiopacillo
AT moscatou implementationofresiliencetrainingprogrammesinchildrenandadolescentsvalueandbarriersclaudiopacillo
AT sistilg implementationofresiliencetrainingprogrammesinchildrenandadolescentsvalueandbarriersclaudiopacillo