Cargando…
Implementation of resilience training programmes in children and adolescents: value and barriers: Claudio Pacillo
BACKGROUND: Emotional distress increasingly represents a major burden in children and adolescents (C&A), especially in conflict zones where its prevalence is estimated to reach 70%. Resilience training programmes (RTPs) are interventions that seek to enhance resilience in individuals or groups p...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593505/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.523 |
_version_ | 1784815176539701248 |
---|---|
author | Pacillo, C Malorni, W Moscato, U Sisti, LG |
author_facet | Pacillo, C Malorni, W Moscato, U Sisti, LG |
author_sort | Pacillo, C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Emotional distress increasingly represents a major burden in children and adolescents (C&A), especially in conflict zones where its prevalence is estimated to reach 70%. Resilience training programmes (RTPs) are interventions that seek to enhance resilience in individuals or groups pursuing mental distress prevention. Literature suggests RTPs be particularly effective in C&A; however, their effectiveness and value for public health are still unclear. METHODS: A scoping review was performed in order to summarize evidence regarding the implementation and effectiveness of RTPs in children and adolescents. A search string has been built according to the PICO model and launched on PubMed, PsycInfo, Academia databases. Additional references were identified by a hand-search in Google Scholar. Studies included were narratively summarized according to topics that emerged. RESULTS: 18 articles were finally included in the review. Main issues were 1) RTPs seem to be more effective in adolescents rather than in children; 2) COVID-19 pandemic has raised the attention towards RTPs in C&A; 3) beyond conflict zones their implementation is increasingly recognized in supporting C&A management of daily stressors and traumas also in C&A with disabilities; 4) school is identified as the key setting for RTPs; 5) the high heterogeneity in RTPs approaches, contexts and study samples limits a conclusive effectiveness assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlighted how RTPs are increasingly recognized as a tool to improve C&A cognitive and behavioral functioning and resilience to external stressors, getting greater interest in the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite relevant theoretical support and promising study results, RTPs still lack strong evidence supporting their embracement by policymakers and effective implementation in public health policy. In order to not miss this chance, more efforts are needed in strengthening RTPs conceptualization and cost-effectiveness studies. KEY MESSAGES: • RTPs are a promising tool to enhance the resilience of children and adolescents gaining increasing interest due to the COVID-19 pandemic. • More studies are needed to provide a strong evidence base that supports their acknowledgment by policymakers and their implementation in public health policies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9593505 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95935052022-11-04 Implementation of resilience training programmes in children and adolescents: value and barriers: Claudio Pacillo Pacillo, C Malorni, W Moscato, U Sisti, LG Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme BACKGROUND: Emotional distress increasingly represents a major burden in children and adolescents (C&A), especially in conflict zones where its prevalence is estimated to reach 70%. Resilience training programmes (RTPs) are interventions that seek to enhance resilience in individuals or groups pursuing mental distress prevention. Literature suggests RTPs be particularly effective in C&A; however, their effectiveness and value for public health are still unclear. METHODS: A scoping review was performed in order to summarize evidence regarding the implementation and effectiveness of RTPs in children and adolescents. A search string has been built according to the PICO model and launched on PubMed, PsycInfo, Academia databases. Additional references were identified by a hand-search in Google Scholar. Studies included were narratively summarized according to topics that emerged. RESULTS: 18 articles were finally included in the review. Main issues were 1) RTPs seem to be more effective in adolescents rather than in children; 2) COVID-19 pandemic has raised the attention towards RTPs in C&A; 3) beyond conflict zones their implementation is increasingly recognized in supporting C&A management of daily stressors and traumas also in C&A with disabilities; 4) school is identified as the key setting for RTPs; 5) the high heterogeneity in RTPs approaches, contexts and study samples limits a conclusive effectiveness assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlighted how RTPs are increasingly recognized as a tool to improve C&A cognitive and behavioral functioning and resilience to external stressors, getting greater interest in the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite relevant theoretical support and promising study results, RTPs still lack strong evidence supporting their embracement by policymakers and effective implementation in public health policy. In order to not miss this chance, more efforts are needed in strengthening RTPs conceptualization and cost-effectiveness studies. KEY MESSAGES: • RTPs are a promising tool to enhance the resilience of children and adolescents gaining increasing interest due to the COVID-19 pandemic. • More studies are needed to provide a strong evidence base that supports their acknowledgment by policymakers and their implementation in public health policies. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9593505/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.523 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Parallel Programme Pacillo, C Malorni, W Moscato, U Sisti, LG Implementation of resilience training programmes in children and adolescents: value and barriers: Claudio Pacillo |
title | Implementation of resilience training programmes in children and adolescents: value and barriers: Claudio Pacillo |
title_full | Implementation of resilience training programmes in children and adolescents: value and barriers: Claudio Pacillo |
title_fullStr | Implementation of resilience training programmes in children and adolescents: value and barriers: Claudio Pacillo |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of resilience training programmes in children and adolescents: value and barriers: Claudio Pacillo |
title_short | Implementation of resilience training programmes in children and adolescents: value and barriers: Claudio Pacillo |
title_sort | implementation of resilience training programmes in children and adolescents: value and barriers: claudio pacillo |
topic | Parallel Programme |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593505/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.523 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pacilloc implementationofresiliencetrainingprogrammesinchildrenandadolescentsvalueandbarriersclaudiopacillo AT malorniw implementationofresiliencetrainingprogrammesinchildrenandadolescentsvalueandbarriersclaudiopacillo AT moscatou implementationofresiliencetrainingprogrammesinchildrenandadolescentsvalueandbarriersclaudiopacillo AT sistilg implementationofresiliencetrainingprogrammesinchildrenandadolescentsvalueandbarriersclaudiopacillo |