Cargando…

Long-term immunity after HBV vaccine: shall we consider a change? A 20-year-follow-up study

INTRODUCTION: Although vaccines against HBV have been available since the 1980s, the long-term immunity is still debated. When assessing immune persistence, a number of clearly defined variables must be taken into account. Often the expression ‘infant vaccination’ means the administration within the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fonzo, M, Amoruso, I, Baldovin, T, Trevisan, A, Bertoncello, C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593581/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.052
_version_ 1784815196079915008
author Fonzo, M
Amoruso, I
Baldovin, T
Trevisan, A
Bertoncello, C
author_facet Fonzo, M
Amoruso, I
Baldovin, T
Trevisan, A
Bertoncello, C
author_sort Fonzo, M
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Although vaccines against HBV have been available since the 1980s, the long-term immunity is still debated. When assessing immune persistence, a number of clearly defined variables must be taken into account. Often the expression ‘infant vaccination’ means the administration within the first year of life at any age, but a difference of a few months may imply a different antibody persistence over the years. This study assessed the anti-HBs titre 20 years after the primary vaccination course and estimated the effect of age at 1st dose and time interval between doses on long-term protection. METHODS: Data on age, sex and date of administration were collected. Inclusion criteria: born to negative mother, 3-dose schedule, no previous HBV infection, age at enrolment 18-24 years; age at 1st dose 2-12 months. Titres ≥10IU/l were considered protective. A logistic regression was performed, adjusting for sex, follow-up time and date of 1st dose and analysis. RESULTS: We included 5,485 participants (64% female). The mean anti-HBsAg increased from 46, 52, 85 to 193IU/l when the 1st dose was administered in the I, II, III or IV trimester of life, respectively. Similarly, the proportion of individuals with titre <10IU/l decreased from 51 to 18% between the two extreme quarters. The risk of a titre <10IU/l decreased with age at the 1st dose (AOR: 0.84; 95%CI: 0.78-0.91 per one-month increase) and time between the 2nd and 3rd doses (AOR: 0.89; 95%CI:0.85-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: The mere presence of a titre <10IU/l does not equate lack of protection. However, antibody levels are very different depending on the actual age of vaccination. One-month delay within the first year is associated with a -18% chance of a titre <10IU/l 20 years later. Although this information needs to be combined with local epidemiology and surveillance to obtain an informed risk-benefit balance, the implications from a public health and economic perspective may be diverse and worth considering. KEY MESSAGES: • Still within the first year of life, a delay in the administration of the 1st dose of HBV vaccine and a longer time between the 2nd and 3rd dose imply a higher antibody persistence even 20 years later. • Considering the local circulation of HBV and surveillance, this result could be taken into account to obtain an informed risk-benefit balance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9593581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95935812022-11-22 Long-term immunity after HBV vaccine: shall we consider a change? A 20-year-follow-up study Fonzo, M Amoruso, I Baldovin, T Trevisan, A Bertoncello, C Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme INTRODUCTION: Although vaccines against HBV have been available since the 1980s, the long-term immunity is still debated. When assessing immune persistence, a number of clearly defined variables must be taken into account. Often the expression ‘infant vaccination’ means the administration within the first year of life at any age, but a difference of a few months may imply a different antibody persistence over the years. This study assessed the anti-HBs titre 20 years after the primary vaccination course and estimated the effect of age at 1st dose and time interval between doses on long-term protection. METHODS: Data on age, sex and date of administration were collected. Inclusion criteria: born to negative mother, 3-dose schedule, no previous HBV infection, age at enrolment 18-24 years; age at 1st dose 2-12 months. Titres ≥10IU/l were considered protective. A logistic regression was performed, adjusting for sex, follow-up time and date of 1st dose and analysis. RESULTS: We included 5,485 participants (64% female). The mean anti-HBsAg increased from 46, 52, 85 to 193IU/l when the 1st dose was administered in the I, II, III or IV trimester of life, respectively. Similarly, the proportion of individuals with titre <10IU/l decreased from 51 to 18% between the two extreme quarters. The risk of a titre <10IU/l decreased with age at the 1st dose (AOR: 0.84; 95%CI: 0.78-0.91 per one-month increase) and time between the 2nd and 3rd doses (AOR: 0.89; 95%CI:0.85-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: The mere presence of a titre <10IU/l does not equate lack of protection. However, antibody levels are very different depending on the actual age of vaccination. One-month delay within the first year is associated with a -18% chance of a titre <10IU/l 20 years later. Although this information needs to be combined with local epidemiology and surveillance to obtain an informed risk-benefit balance, the implications from a public health and economic perspective may be diverse and worth considering. KEY MESSAGES: • Still within the first year of life, a delay in the administration of the 1st dose of HBV vaccine and a longer time between the 2nd and 3rd dose imply a higher antibody persistence even 20 years later. • Considering the local circulation of HBV and surveillance, this result could be taken into account to obtain an informed risk-benefit balance. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9593581/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.052 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
Fonzo, M
Amoruso, I
Baldovin, T
Trevisan, A
Bertoncello, C
Long-term immunity after HBV vaccine: shall we consider a change? A 20-year-follow-up study
title Long-term immunity after HBV vaccine: shall we consider a change? A 20-year-follow-up study
title_full Long-term immunity after HBV vaccine: shall we consider a change? A 20-year-follow-up study
title_fullStr Long-term immunity after HBV vaccine: shall we consider a change? A 20-year-follow-up study
title_full_unstemmed Long-term immunity after HBV vaccine: shall we consider a change? A 20-year-follow-up study
title_short Long-term immunity after HBV vaccine: shall we consider a change? A 20-year-follow-up study
title_sort long-term immunity after hbv vaccine: shall we consider a change? a 20-year-follow-up study
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593581/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.052
work_keys_str_mv AT fonzom longtermimmunityafterhbvvaccineshallweconsiderachangea20yearfollowupstudy
AT amorusoi longtermimmunityafterhbvvaccineshallweconsiderachangea20yearfollowupstudy
AT baldovint longtermimmunityafterhbvvaccineshallweconsiderachangea20yearfollowupstudy
AT trevisana longtermimmunityafterhbvvaccineshallweconsiderachangea20yearfollowupstudy
AT bertoncelloc longtermimmunityafterhbvvaccineshallweconsiderachangea20yearfollowupstudy