Cargando…

Systematic review on digitals tools used for contact tracing of COVID-19 patients: interim results: Brigid Unim

BACKGROUND: Contact tracing is a public health intervention implemented in synergy with other measures, such as testing, physical distancing, and vaccination, to curb the COVID-19 pandemic. Digital solutions have been developed worldwide to enhance the contact tracing process. The aim of the study w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Unim, B, Zile-Velika, I, Misins, J, Pavlovska, Z, Lapão, L, Peyroteo, M, Palmieri, L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593684/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.063
_version_ 1784815223015735296
author Unim, B
Zile-Velika, I
Misins, J
Pavlovska, Z
Lapão, L
Peyroteo, M
Palmieri, L
author_facet Unim, B
Zile-Velika, I
Misins, J
Pavlovska, Z
Lapão, L
Peyroteo, M
Palmieri, L
author_sort Unim, B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Contact tracing is a public health intervention implemented in synergy with other measures, such as testing, physical distancing, and vaccination, to curb the COVID-19 pandemic. Digital solutions have been developed worldwide to enhance the contact tracing process. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of tracking COVID-19 patients using digital tools. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed on eight online databases to identify observational studies on digital contact tracing, published 2020-2021, in English. Studies identified through the ‘Population Health Information Research Infrastructure’ project were also included. An ad hoc form has been deployed for data extraction of relevant information. Quality assessment of the included studies will be performed using validated tools. RESULTS: Over 8000 records were identified, of which 27 met the inclusion criteria: 16 modelling and 11 population-based studies. A study was based on GPS technology, four were Bluetooth-based, and others used digital technologies and manual tracing. The uptake rate of the tools ranged 19-100% across the studies. Most studies compared digital contact tracing with other strategies (e.g., no intervention, lockdown). Digital contact tracing was associated with improved identification of contact persons (9 studies), reduction of the effective reproduction number or covid-19 infections (8 studies), and increased effectiveness in combination with other containment measures (9 studies). Security and privacy issues were considered in 8 studies. CONCLUSIONS: Digital contact tracing contributes in reducing further transmission, especially with sufficient population uptake of the applications and in combination with other public health measures. However, its deployment has been limited by security and privacy issues. Further studies are required to investigate the combined impact of digital and conventional contact tracing and enhance privacy and security.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9593684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95936842022-11-04 Systematic review on digitals tools used for contact tracing of COVID-19 patients: interim results: Brigid Unim Unim, B Zile-Velika, I Misins, J Pavlovska, Z Lapão, L Peyroteo, M Palmieri, L Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme BACKGROUND: Contact tracing is a public health intervention implemented in synergy with other measures, such as testing, physical distancing, and vaccination, to curb the COVID-19 pandemic. Digital solutions have been developed worldwide to enhance the contact tracing process. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of tracking COVID-19 patients using digital tools. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed on eight online databases to identify observational studies on digital contact tracing, published 2020-2021, in English. Studies identified through the ‘Population Health Information Research Infrastructure’ project were also included. An ad hoc form has been deployed for data extraction of relevant information. Quality assessment of the included studies will be performed using validated tools. RESULTS: Over 8000 records were identified, of which 27 met the inclusion criteria: 16 modelling and 11 population-based studies. A study was based on GPS technology, four were Bluetooth-based, and others used digital technologies and manual tracing. The uptake rate of the tools ranged 19-100% across the studies. Most studies compared digital contact tracing with other strategies (e.g., no intervention, lockdown). Digital contact tracing was associated with improved identification of contact persons (9 studies), reduction of the effective reproduction number or covid-19 infections (8 studies), and increased effectiveness in combination with other containment measures (9 studies). Security and privacy issues were considered in 8 studies. CONCLUSIONS: Digital contact tracing contributes in reducing further transmission, especially with sufficient population uptake of the applications and in combination with other public health measures. However, its deployment has been limited by security and privacy issues. Further studies are required to investigate the combined impact of digital and conventional contact tracing and enhance privacy and security. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9593684/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.063 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
Unim, B
Zile-Velika, I
Misins, J
Pavlovska, Z
Lapão, L
Peyroteo, M
Palmieri, L
Systematic review on digitals tools used for contact tracing of COVID-19 patients: interim results: Brigid Unim
title Systematic review on digitals tools used for contact tracing of COVID-19 patients: interim results: Brigid Unim
title_full Systematic review on digitals tools used for contact tracing of COVID-19 patients: interim results: Brigid Unim
title_fullStr Systematic review on digitals tools used for contact tracing of COVID-19 patients: interim results: Brigid Unim
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review on digitals tools used for contact tracing of COVID-19 patients: interim results: Brigid Unim
title_short Systematic review on digitals tools used for contact tracing of COVID-19 patients: interim results: Brigid Unim
title_sort systematic review on digitals tools used for contact tracing of covid-19 patients: interim results: brigid unim
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593684/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.063
work_keys_str_mv AT unimb systematicreviewondigitalstoolsusedforcontacttracingofcovid19patientsinterimresultsbrigidunim
AT zilevelikai systematicreviewondigitalstoolsusedforcontacttracingofcovid19patientsinterimresultsbrigidunim
AT misinsj systematicreviewondigitalstoolsusedforcontacttracingofcovid19patientsinterimresultsbrigidunim
AT pavlovskaz systematicreviewondigitalstoolsusedforcontacttracingofcovid19patientsinterimresultsbrigidunim
AT lapaol systematicreviewondigitalstoolsusedforcontacttracingofcovid19patientsinterimresultsbrigidunim
AT peyroteom systematicreviewondigitalstoolsusedforcontacttracingofcovid19patientsinterimresultsbrigidunim
AT palmieril systematicreviewondigitalstoolsusedforcontacttracingofcovid19patientsinterimresultsbrigidunim